Why does /pol/ judge the validity of a movement by the attractiveness of its followers?
"The reflection of the resolve of any given person, and consequently their belief systems, can be found in their physical form. Those who espouse well disciplined and sincere beliefs are more likely to care for their vessel, which must survive if they are to enact their desired form of change."
>>67238578
Every human being does that.
>>67238578
People who are ugly are more likely to have weird motivations for their actions.
>>67238578
Because my dick tells me that that girl is hot, and even though that TD tickles me, I would change my way of thinking for her cunt.
Hormones, huh.
>>67238578
Because no one here actually understands political and economic systems, they just spout memetics they've picked up from elsewhere, so they rationalize their attraction to a person as appreciation for their ideology.
>>67238578
Because the American right is constantly told that they are ugly, fat rednecks?
>>67239025
>Because the American right are ugly, fat rednecks?
ftfw
>>67239172
Isn't that just the reverse of what OP is saying?
"Why do leftcucks judge the validity of a movement by the attractiveness of its followers?"
>>67238578
>first you get the money
>then you get the power
>then you get the women
If women flock to a certain movement does essentially say it's powerful and influencial enough for her to ride along.
Then again that's not always for the better since women cannot into reason and logic and vote for socialism 9 times out of 10.
Ugly women = have to appeal in ways other than looks = "intelligence" = leftism
Pretty women = no fucking brains + sweet tits ass and face = leech off anything successful = flocking to highest "bidder" (in terms of wealth, power etc.) = prostitutio .
>>67239295
Because it's not just /pol/ but everyone?? It's called lookism/halo effect. Attractive people are perceived as being genetically superior when really beauty is subjective and the whole thing is just a internal bias.
>>67239295
>Isn't that just the reverse of what OP is saying?
no Cletus, read it again
>>67238578
>dat strawman
Nazigirls.exe activate
I feel sorry for commies; Leftist dropouts and misguided eurasian mongrels are about the best you've got as far as women go.
>>67238578
Because we're shallow, superficial ppl for whom the urge to masturbate supercedes all else, including the need to know the truth on any given topic
>>67239668
If beauty is subjective, then why are white women put on a pedestal by every minorty group?
There's some pretty funny statistics when it comes to racial preferences in sex, especially in america. Educate yourself.
>>67240212
Also, Dindus. how forgetful of me
Most models and actors are liberal. At least the ones who are raised by Hollywood identify as feminists most of the time.
>>67240579
so you think beauty is objective... like this is an actually thought you have that you share with people?
