/pol/, who is the definitive anti-communist philosopher?
I'm fucking sick of the marxist posters that le blue hair reddit SJWs put up in and around every single university in my city and I want to fuck with them by matching their posters with anti-communist stuff.
College communists are scum
Ralph Waldo Emerson
I'll link in a second.
>>67218587
http://www.emersoncentral.com/wealth.htm
>>67218504
Hobbes and Locke come to mind. Pretty sure Nichtze wasn't a commie.
>>67218504
Hitler
Evola.
Anti-communist in what way? You mean as in libertarian, or as in conservative? Dugin is extremely conservative and favors the Orthodox Financial System over communism, and says we need a new fascism. But he also idolizes Stalin for the USSR as an empire.
>>67218504
E V O L A
V
O
L
A
>>67218679
Hobbes and Locke predate gommunism by like 2 full centuries and in Nichtze's day no one took them seriously yet.
I enjoy listening to Hayek.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPJWwiKnYGs
Liberty Prime quotes
Nietszsche and Rand.
Read the Fountainhead. Not Atlas Shrugged.
>>67218504
Oh, sounds like you need Roger Scruton's Fools, Frauds and Firebrands, which introduces, debunks, and provides alternatives for all the major Leftist thinkers like Sartre, Lacan, Gramsci and Zizek. Very entertainingly written too.
>>67218764
Basically anything that actively shits all over communism directly, maybe also something that isn't traditionalist because a lot of their recent posters start with "The radical ideas of..... karl marx"
it'd be funny if I could have one that was "The radical ideas of.... xxxxx" without not making sense because they aren't radical at all
>>67218504
Hobbes.
Socrates.
Von Mises
>>67219273
Karl Popper
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-most-elegant-refutations-of-communism
>>67219344
>>67218504
I forgot Hayek.
Austrian school of economics is a goldmine for countering socialist belief.
Also against Stalinism and centralisation, one of their own Trotsky is a good source for argument
>The Open Society and its Enemies
seems breddy good
>>67218679
>>67218975
who the fuck is Nichtze?
>>67219130
>Nietszsche
oh god burgers please stop
It's Nietzsche and unless you hate the american way of life you shouldn't even be reading his works
>>67220247
Like I give a fuck about spelling, Klaus.
>>67220595
I don't give a fuck what you give a fuck about or not
If you're going to use my culture to enrich yourself and your surroundings I demand you to make use of the proper spellings
And it's Herr Klaus for you
>>67221022
This must be that German humor I hear so much about.
>>67220247
I kind of do.
But this brings to light the rather unpleasant point that very few philosophies conclude the best way to live your life is to spend your time thinking and arguing about philosophy. Which makes most people who talk often about philosophy hypocrites - at best.
Rand understood this. I can tell. She knew the ideal man would be contemptuous of philosophy.
>>67218504
Leo Strauss
>>67218504
Thomas Carlyle knew why communism was bad before we even fully understood what communism was.
>>67219130
>Nietszsche and Rand.
Retard, their end result is the same as communism with a small elite ruling over the peasant masses. The only thing that separates them from communism is that they advocated a top to bottom revolution instead of a bottom to top revolution like communism does.
Look, if you're looking for the fundamental failing of socialism (and hence communism), I'll give it to right now. The fundamental core of socialism is the obliteration of the concept of value. Both the value of people and the value material items.
It should be obvious why this goes against rationality.
>>67218504
Bill Whittle and Friedrich Hayek
>>67218657
Not very sound-bitey.
>>67219465
>first post has some shill defending Soros
D R O P P E D
>>67221993
Uh, yes? Only a staggering imbecile thinks the masses should be in charge of anything, ever. How has giving women and niggers control of the world through 'democracy' worked out?
Either Joseph Stalin or Mao Zedong.
