>bootlickers, trumptards and conservashits will defend this
>>67127807
None of us wanted the Wall Street bailouts. You think we'd ever support socializing corporate losses let alone kike corporate losses?
>>67127807
True. Fuck Obama
>bootlickers, trumptards and conservashits will defend this
you really have no fucking clue nigger. keep turning people away from democrats with your attitude though
thanks!
Those numbers are bullshit
>>67128606
If the american people hated the bailout so much, how come you let Bush send it through and Obama give the criminals immunity? Don't you guys have "democracy" or "representation" or something?
>>67127807
Are these people retarded? Do they actually believe that the US doesn't have healthcare, infrastructure, public transports, education, renewable energy, welfare programs or public elections?
Also, do these fucking idiots not understand that expenditures don't simply disappear into the ether? Money spent on the military, for example, are used to pay the salary of hundreds of thousands of engineers, scientists, soldiers and other personell and to develop new technology. This money is eventually pumped back into the economy, and doesn't just disappear. On top of this, a lot of the cutting edge technology that takes decades to develop, can only be developed with government funding due to the enormous costs, the long development time and the lack of a profitable product in the short term. DARPA funded Boston Dynamics is a good example.
And regardless of what people think about the F35, fact remains that the US would have to develop a next-gen fighter aircraft sooner or later, and it would cost trillions either way.
>>67127807
>Things we can't afford
>A wall
>Things we can afford
>Free college, healthcare etc for millions of people
>>67127807
Chile shitposting a lot lately. Will Chile be the next Australia? Find out next time on "Cucks Emerging".
We shouldn't pa for any of that baring Infrastructure
>>67127807
>things Mexico will afford: a wall
>>67127807
The banks need an axe taken too them but our military engagements do produce positive results. Lately it hasn't been handled most effecient but it is a thing.
>>67127807
Trump is against everything on the bottom, but nice little attempt.
>>67130347
But they don't want to pay for it.
The only people that support bernie are poor college students
>>67127807
>no price tags in the we can't afford section
I wonder why...
>Feeding the poor
Why the poor? Why not everybody? Is there a legal limit; a floor? If you're under that line, free food? Wait, isn't that already a thing? How much free food for the people under this line? Infinite?
Why would people above that line pay for food if being one-dollar under it means infinite free food?
>>67127807
>trumptards
All bait aside, a great point of Trump's campaign is how much money politicians have wasted in globalist interventionist policies at the expense of American workers and for the sake of rich donors.
