Was he right?
>>67072511
about what...? he was probably innocent of what he was charged, though. Source: find it your fucking self.
>>67072511
No.
>>67072694
>he was innocent of conspiracy
He admitted to it.
>>67072807
but was he innocent of murder?
satiric thread detected
>>67072996
That's not what he was charged with.
>>67073364
What flag is that?
>>67072511
About the race war thing?
>>67073408
>>67072807
>claiming credit means you did it
There's a camp that actually believes the people that commited the murders scapegoated a crazy man and made up a bunch of bullshit about him being a charismatic king.
If you read the facts of the case, it really seems like everyone that wasn't him was completely in control of their faculties the entire time, or moments where he would have control, it was always supported by one of the other guys jumping in to second. There's also debate on whether he was even the one that the ideas were coming from originally in those scenes.
It's actually fascinating. The guy is a nutjob, without a doubt. But you have a practical scooby doo gang following him around that were into drugs and being wild.
I honestly think he's crazy, weak, and drug addled, and got picked up by another guy, and the gang expanded a bit after a couple parties, and then they commited the murders and in his stupor got convinced he's a god or something.
He also acknowledges he doesn't know how to function outside jail and is more comfortable inside. So he'd be an easy sell to volunteer as scapegoat and everyone else just playing the victim.
>>67072511
About what?
>>67073455
grenada
hover over a flag to see its origin newkiddie
>>67072511
Here's your answer mate:
https://youtu.be/o2oZWpqtNi4
He was nothing.
>>67074009
He was charged that through conspiracy. If you conspire to murder someone all members of the conspiracy serve the same punishment for the same crimes as the entire party is considered responsible.
>>67072511
Apparently.
