If India had become a French Raj instead of a British one, how would it have affected the world?
You would smell like cologne and shit, not only shit
>>67017481
France was supposedly the best European power to get colonized by because they educated the populace instead of just building infrastructure and yelling, "We're helping, see!"
>>67017820
Goddamn. :D
>>67017481
>avoid crackers, the builders of modern society and most technology
>>67017481
Multiply the famines by 10 and divide the infrastructure by 10 and don't believe the ameritard who says French were the best people to get colonized by.
The Commonwealth countries are far superior to those under French rule
Also if you're a Muslim kill yourself right now
Indian food would have even more garlic and onion in it.
>>67018204
They fucked the natives too.
>>67017481
It wouldn't because India is irrelevant shithole in every parallel dimension
>>67017481
I don't know. How did Vietnam turn out?
>>67017481
Agreed. The sodium content alone should give you pause, much less the fat+carbs.
>>67017481
It would have been worse, because Frenchies are fags. British people at least had the air of noblesse oblige, even though French people meme'd it into existence.
India would probably have overthrown the French cucks instead of battling politically for independence. I think Hitler would have been even more popular in India had it become a French Raj first.
I don't know.
Try to look at Pondichéry, Chandernagor etc..
>>67017481
merde 2 les toilettes
>>67021973
There are still French people in the former french india unlike British who all left.
>>67021622
>>67021973
Do you think the world would have been much different? I am not just talking about India.
>>67023754
France would be much richer. So yes, maybe money to fuel wars, and of course, a more Catholic India (best part of it)
