Early voting numbers are showing that democrats are ditching the democrat party to vote for Trump.
As much as 10% of democrats are voting for trump. This is from numbers in Chicago, Ohio and Pennsylvania
http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2016/03/10/report-46000-pa-democrats-become-republicans-due-to-trump/
>>67011025
this is a movement
glorious
>>67011025
Union scum are almost as bad as niggers
fuck them
>>67011025
Sexist just don't want to vote for a woman in November.
>>67011283
edgy
>>67011025
How do you know this isn't strategic voting to pit a terrible candidate against Hillary?
>>67011025
GET ON THE TRUMP TRAIN OR GET RUNNED OVER
>>67011362
>terrible candidate
If that were the case they would be supporting Kasich, Cruz or Rubio
7% of Democrats voted for Romney
http://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us-elections/how-groups-voted/how-groups-voted-2012
>>67011362
It certainly can't be white workers wanting someone to stop these suicidal trade deals
>>67011362
Do you have any proof it is?
If not then fuck off with the rest of the far right conspiratards "HURRR HURR THEY'RE JUST VOTING TRUMP SO HE LOSES AGAINST HILLARY VOTE FOR THE *TRUE CONSERVATIVE* CRUZ"
>>67011504
Pretty much this. Trumps protectionism is basically what the unions have been lobbying for. It will be interesting to see if the unions endorse Trump after Hillary gets the nomination.
>>67011025
Trump is pro-worker and pro-union, so Democrats who aren't total pussies have no reason not to vote for him.
The only voters who don't like Trump are effeminate Millennials, niggers on welfare, illegal spics, and terrorist sand niggers.
America would be much, much better if we wiped out all of those degenerate groups, and everyone knows it.
>>67012044
The west hung about 1% of the population year after year for 100s of years. This greatly increased the European stock.
America needs to hang 5% of the population for about 100 years to get ourselves fixed again.
>>67011025
Yeah rush was just on alluding this was an operation chaos shtick.
No one wants to admit there are still blue dog conservative dems that like trump.
That and unions are secretly pro trump.
I'm a registered democrat as well and haven't voted since bush vs Kerry. Voting Trump
>>67011283
Unions are good the way corperations are good.. They can be corrupt and shitty, we need workers to have more union choice and they should not be forced to support unions who they feel do not represent them.
>>67012204
No rush said that is it Reagan democrats voting for trump or is it operation chaos.
It's clearly Reagan democrats voting trump.
The left is scared to death of trump.
>>67011362
The democrats who truly hate donald are so democrat entrenched they'll never bother to do that, they'll vote for hillary or bernie.
>>67012386
Unions became bad because they were taken over by leftist commies
>>67012497
Agreed; and now many union members are essentially their slaves. They have huge monopoly's. If Trump passes a "union choice" bill or uses anti-trust laws against that, it will be great.
>>67012429
He just said the two based black trump ladies (mmmm mm mmm) are doing operation chaos. Literally just said it.
I do agree with you, but rush is trying very hard not to reveal his shill power level.
>>67011025
Not surprised. I just changed my party affiliation from Independent to Republican today.
>>67011283
Unions are fine when they don't devolve into organized crime syndicates.
To show how big of a deal this is:
Reagan had 13% democrat vote in Chicago, Trump has 10%.
>>67012817
HOLY FUCKING SHIT RUSH IS NOW TALKING ABOUT THAT LYING CUNT GETTING PUSHED AROUND GOD DAM FUCK THIS FAT PILL POPPING NIGGER
>>67011362
Operation Chaos
>>67011283
Stay jelly, poorfag.
>>67011460
Then they werent democrats.
Pretty simple
>>67011025
I'm a Pennsylvanian registered Democrat that will be voting for Trump.
Is everyone here listening to Rush? He was cracking me up by calling them Black Babes.
>>67011283
this. fuck unions. they are price fixers and mobsters
>>67012497
Fuck the unions! You know why China is taking over the world?
When American workers rebel, the American employers negotiate with them.
When Chinese workers rebel, the Chinese employers call the cops, who proceed to torture them for like a week and then send them the fuck back to work.
This one time, some Chinese workers jumped off the roof because they weren't satisfied with working conditions. Then some more did the same thing. You know how the government dealt with it? They spread nets around the buildings, and beat the shit out of the next person to try to kill themselves.
Might seem edgy to you Amerilards, but it was totally worth it.
It's funny how you have neocons who would rather vote for Hillary than Trump, and Democrats who would rather vote for Trump than Hillary.
I hate Trump's guts too much to vote for him or enjoy seeing him succeed. But if I was being forced to vote and it was Hillary vs Trump, I'd pick Trump. I'm hardly the first person to feel this way.
>>67014227
calling who black babes?
>>67014370
(you)
>>67014420
Diamond & Silk
>>67011283
Private unions are fine. It's just negotiation. Forced Union membership is wrong and do are public unions for obvious reasons.
Reagan 2 had 13% in Chicago
Trump 1 has 10
Reagan 1 had 8
Romney had 2
>>67014198
In the span of a single year, I got sick of Obama as a registered Democrat in PA and changed my party to Green more out of protest than anything. I returned to college after a decade, and discovered a fucking hugbox that actively tried to destroy free speech.
I'm now a registered Republican voting for Trump. I still am more socially liberal, but I feel like the party I was with in my youth left me behind. Honestly, I'd probably vote for Webb over anyone if he were in the race.
What a difference though a year makes.
>>67012199
Edgy
>>67011283
The balance of power and job security in a union job versus non-union is day and night. Your boss being a dick? Tell him to get fucked and to get a steward while he's at it. Good luck even saying anything mildly controversial (you know, like sticking up for yourself) at your non-union job. Here's your unemployment form while you're at it. Strength in numbers, my friend.
>>67011362
Hardline leftists are too up their own asses to ever let anyone like Trump near even so much as a nomination, even if they thought it'd be strategically viable for themselves in the long-term. "No platform," as they say. They want Trump gone NOW, they want him to lose the nomination so the media stops reporting on him and his rhetoric which they believe encourages the public to believe it. Even if an individual wanted to do so and tried to explain why, they'd be terrified of their peers ostracizing them for it, they know their own kind would rip them apart for "giving Trump oxygen." It's not even a discussion for them, it's like discussing pedophilia laws. If you say anything short of "hang all pedophiles by their nutsacks and torture them to death," they'll go full Salem witch trials on you.
>>67011460
If 10% of Dems voted for him would he have won?
>>67017205
I imagine the republicans are losing some neocons to Hillary, too.
>>67011283
if you are an employed worker, a union is the most important thing you can have
>>67011118
If Trump manages to get the GOP to be pro-Union, the Democrats would become fucked out of more than half their financial support.
This isn't even funny anymore. Trump could actually make America into a one party state.
I have family members in pittsburgh that have been locked out and replaced with mexicans. Things are pretty bad, its really sad
>>67012497
unions were always leftist, it's part of the program
however, so are large companies who have more money than them
>>67015386
>They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
>>67018660
https://www.marxists.org/archive/debs/works/1918/court.htm
Socialist fuck btw but great speaker
Germany never had any good workers rights leader.
All our worker leaders never worked a day in their life.
>>67011362
Like jeb bush?
>>67019000
ATI?
MADMAN
Trump will take New York and New Jersey now.
>>67018660
not in the US
>>67019274
Not sure. Allegheny ludlum, brackenridge
>>67011025
of course, what you are leaving out is the # of republicucks that will also switch sides and/or not vote at all because they hate trump.
ive said it a bunch of times: trump's base is not growing. people either love him or hate him. he will get wrecked in a general election because his base is stagnant. his primary success is 100% due to an early, heavily split field that launched his momentum.
plus, /pol/ is ALWAYS wrong. pic extremely related. look forward to your tears, /pol/.
>>67018932
Making America Great isn't supposed to be funny.
>>67019405
Yeah that's it. I work there. Lockout is over. We're going back to work.
>>67019439
First everyone thought that Trump wouldn't make it through NH. Then they thought his support would top out at 10% and end at Super Tuesday. Then it was upped to 20% and he won March 9th. Now people claim his support is at 30% max.
At the end of it, we live in a two party system. If Trump has an -R next to his name Republicans will blindly vote for him regardless. They did so with Dubya, twice, and with Reagan twice as well. The only people who would consider switching are old evangelicals, but even then they won't if Hilary is the nominee. Libertarians will continue to bitch and whine like they always have.
Look at Congress, and most state legislatures. The GOP's power has grown since 2012 and they have the largest majority they have had since 1955. Should Trump win, they will have the largest majority since 1926.
>>67011362
Sounds like a golden plan to me.
>>67014656
Noone has been forced to join a Union since the Taft - Hartley act of 1947. Closed Union shops don't exist anymore.
This is one of the reasons why I honestly think trump has a great chance of winning. I think tons of blue collar Democrats will vote for trump
>>67019781
screencapped--like i said, look forward to your tears. the romney meltdown was fucking hilarious, and this is shaping up to be one of the best /pol/ moments in history.
>>67019811
You still have to join, T-H just removes a portion of your dues.
>>67015386
filling a greivance because its my job to shitpost you company scum.
>>67012329
If you wanna help Trump, change party affiliation to Republican. Vote for him in the primaries.
>>67019781
>The only people who would consider switching are old evangelicals,
They love him
>>67019811
lol
>>67011025
The RNC has been telling us the past eight years at least we needed a moderate like Romney or McCain or Jeb to appeal to moderates on the other side. Now that we actually have someone who commands not only a large number of republicans but also a large number of blue collar democrats, the RNC is going out of their way to take him down. Either they're criminally inept or just downright dishonest.
Most of the guys in my Union support Trump. We don't need politicians trying to tip the laws in our favor, all we want is a level playing field, i.e. get rid of the illegals. Democrats have killed their Union support with their backing of amnesty for illegals.
>>67019439
>>67019781
Also, back in 2012 Snowden hadn't happened. There is now a split in the DNC over that and Hilary represents the loosing side. Sanders supporters will not turn out for Hilary since they are against her positions on the NSA and military.
In the end, 2016 is going to be a massive Republican victory not because of massive turnout, but because of a lack of turnout combined with existing gains in the legislature. All the GOP needs is the White House (or a supermajority) while the Democrats have only four states (CA, HI, CT, NJ, Mass) and are locked out of Congress.
This is the culmination of 10 years of GOP grassroots campaigning. It all comes from the bottom up. First state races, then the House (2010 and 2012), then the Senate (2014), now the White House (2016).
>>67019439
someone better make a 2016 version of this
>>67019868
Things have changed since 2012. Obama has had a major scandal (Snowden) which decimated his support among Progressives while the middle east meltdown blows support amongst moderates.
It's a matter of turnout. In 2012 enough Democrats walked out for Obama. Most aren't going to be doing the same for Hilary. Of course, Sanders could still win and then it'd be an issue with moderate turnout.
But regardless, it either ends with a Republican President running the country or a Republican supermajority doing it.
>>67020103
>Sanders supporters will not turn out for Hilary
this is also a delusion. while sandersfags mostly have a distrust (and some hate) for shillary, all of them are resigned to vote for her if she gets the nod (myself included), which of course says nothing about shillary, and everything about the garbage heap that is the GOP.
is this your first time voting? be honest.
>>67011025
>As much as 10% of democrats are voting for trump. This is from numbers in Chicago, Ohio and Pennsylvania
Oh look, the people who used to have good jobs before outsourcing in ohio are voting trump as well as the people suffering the mojados in chicago. It's like those affected by illegals are the most likely to support stopping them...the parties must have a hard time understanding this...
>>67012044
Stop mansplaning you fucking racist bigot.
>>67020412
registering to vote =! turning out
This is how the GOP lost in 2012, is this your first election?
>>67014198
I think u need to be registered Republican to vote for him in our primary. You have until the 28th this month to switch
>>67011025
My father is a lifelong Democrat and he's voting Trump.
>>67020084
Proxy
>>67019101
>anarchism
go to africa then. in civilized white countries we have laws and regulations to prevent degenerate anti-social behavior, which includes unduly ripping off and exploiting workers.
