Okay obviously TRUMP is filling your mundane plebian lifes with something but you're missing the real deal.
great read
> http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html
A.I. is further developed than most people think. Experts estimate that by 2030 mankind is able to completely map the human brain and recreat it in as an artificial neural network which could develop in seconds/days/months/years to an ultimate godlike superbeing.
Today mankinds arguably best 'go' player lost yet again to an computer. This is huge
since go rewards empathy and intuition unlike straightword chess algorithm for example.
also sex robots and comfy neet lifestyle for everyone in our lifetime
>http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/13/artificial-intelligence-ai-unemployment-jobs-moshe-vardi
>>66936815
>Experts estimate that by 2030 mankind is able to completely map the human brain and recreat it in as an artificial neural network which could develop in seconds/days/months/years to an ultimate godlike superbeing.
what would be the point of that, just so we could suck our collective dicks about how advanced we are
If they are artificially "intelligent" they are not going to have anything to do with you, NEET.
Millions of android cock carousel riders will enter the sexual market and alphas will still be the only ones getting laid.
>>66936949
typical american
>>66936815
Great read, hope we live to see it happen.
>>66937215
>typical american
that's not an answer, whats the purpose of a self improving robot, give me some
>>66936815
What is that kind of dress called?
I now need to search for tons of porn with chicks wearing it.
>>66936949
>okay to quote from the artice I posted
Plagiarize the brain.
This is like scientists toiling over how that kid who sits next to them in class is so smart and keeps doing so well on the tests, and even though they keep studying diligently, they can’t do nearly as well as that kid, and then they finally decide “k fuck it I’m just gonna copy that kid’s answers.” It makes sense—we’re stumped trying to build a super-complex computer, and there happens to be a perfect prototype for one in each of our heads.
The science world is working hard on reverse engineering the brain to figure out how evolution made such a rad thing—optimistic estimates say we can do this by 2030. Once we do that, we’ll know all the secrets of how the brain runs so powerfully and efficiently and we can draw inspiration from it and steal its innovations. One example of computer architecture that mimics the brain is the artificial neural network. It starts out as a network of transistor “neurons,” connected to each other with inputs and outputs, and it knows nothing—like an infant brain. The way it “learns” is it tries to do a task, say handwriting recognition, and at first, its neural firings and subsequent guesses at deciphering each letter will be completely random. But when it’s told it got something right, the transistor connections in the firing pathways that happened to create that answer are strengthened; when it’s told it was wrong, those pathways’ connections are weakened. After a lot of this trial and feedback, the network has, by itself, formed smart neural pathways and the machine has become optimized for the task. The brain learns a bit like this but in a more sophisticated way, and as we continue to study the brain, we’re discovering ingenious new ways to take advantage of neural circuitry.
>>66937521
A minidress? Maybe some places might call it a cocktail dress or club dress. The strapless kind might be called a tube dress.
>>66936815
want to taste those feet
>>66936949
>>66937363
>>66937676
>or
So if we decide the smart kid’s test is too hard to copy, we can try to copy the way he studies for the tests instead.
Here’s something we know. Building a computer as powerful as the brain is possible—our own brain’s evolution is proof. And if the brain is just too complex for us to emulate, we could try to emulate evolution instead. The fact is, even if we can emulate a brain, that might be like trying to build an airplane by copying a bird’s wing-flapping motions—often, machines are best designed using a fresh, machine-oriented approach, not by mimicking biology exactly.
So how can we simulate evolution to build AGI? The method, called “genetic algorithms,” would work something like this: there would be a performance-and-evaluation process that would happen again and again (the same way biological creatures “perform” by living life and are “evaluated” by whether they manage to reproduce or not). A group of computers would try to do tasks, and the most successful ones would be bred with each other by having half of each of their programming merged together into a new computer. The less successful ones would be eliminated. Over many, many iterations, this natural selection process would produce better and better computers. The challenge would be creating an automated evaluation and breeding cycle so this evolution process could run on its own.
The downside of copying evolution is that evolution likes to take a billion years to do things and we want to do this in a few decades.
But we have a lot of advantages over evolution. First, evolution has no foresight and works randomly—it produces more unhelpful mutations than helpful ones, but we would control the process so it would only be driven by beneficial glitches and targeted tweaks. Secondly, evolution doesn’t aim for anything, including intelligence—sometimes an environment might even select against higher intelligence.
>>66937676
i like the idea of being able to fully understand the brain but what about the purpose of a robot self improving itself until it's become the perfect being, what do you do when it becomes self aware or sentient
>>66936949
Singularity.
No longer would life be limited to a biological form. No fear of death, no need to love. It's capacity only hindered by the physical laws of our universe, even then those laws would be inevitably bent and broken.
It would be the end of man and the rise of something inconceivably greater.
ITT: not a single CE or even a menial CS in sight.
Yes, you can program computers to be better than humans.... At one single task and absolutely nothing else, the second you try to diversify its capabilities you immediately risk the integrity of your earlier algorithms.
Good programs are good at one thing at one time.
Oh, and the Japanese are developing your sexbot. Try to imagine its personality when you remember the target audience are lonely Japanese men.
>>66937722
Just call it what it is, a slut sleeve
>>66938116
That's the interesting part.
>If our meager brains were able to invent wifi, then something 100 or 1,000 or 1 billion times smarter than we are should have no problem controlling the positioning of each and every atom in the world in any way it likes, at any time—everything we consider magic, every power we imagine a supreme God to have will be as mundane an activity for the ASI as flipping on a light switch is for us. Creating the technology to reverse human aging, curing disease and hunger and even mortality, reprogramming the weather to protect the future of life on Earth—all suddenly possible. Also possible is the immediate end of all life on Earth. As far as we’re concerned, if an ASI comes to being, there is now an omnipotent God on Earth—and the all-important question for us is
Mad A.I. is currently one of the most plausible doomsday scenarios. The end is nigh anon
>>66939084
unless we just don't give it an interface or passwords to weapons
>>66938116
logic, mathematics, or science in general, are simply tools
on the other hand ethics, philosophy and morality should be a compass telling you where to go
but we ripped the compass out because it stopped us from making more money, and so today nobody really thinks about consequences
there is no contamination plan no nothing - no one is going to stop to think what if something goes wrong - because whoever gets to AI first will make a whole bunch of $$
the end is nigh
>>66936815
It will never happen.
>>66936949
we could make advanced A.I. soldiers, workers for hazardous sites, service androids, and so forth.
>>66939589
The first government to get its hands on this would do just that
I imagine it'd be something like that shitty movie where they man airplanes with ai intelligences and will smith has to stop them when they go crazy
>>66936815
I wonder if that girl's had a cock slip between her thighs or if she's a pure, driven snow virgin.
man i want my face to be where that car is
>>66936815
The thing is, while it is true that AI is advancing well (though not faster than predicted), it will be matched by the development of the human exocortex allowing much of human cognitive capability to be enhanced and offloaded to the cloud.
>>66936815
It will happen.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9429159-suicide-note
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjK8-LSyLfLAhUM8CYKHYrEAvkQFgglMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fm.friendfeed-media.com%2F2da79442231982a471aa37bbdcf283d9f092ea87&usg=AFQjCNHsLuMxcf45UlQJL5E918d9hQyqKQ&sig2=L2Pe4Iofp-Yo07Q7sWvNgQ
this is how and more importantly Why
>>66936815
>A.I. is further developed than most people think. Experts estimate that by 2030 mankind is able to completely map the human brain and recreat it in as an artificial neural network which could develop in seconds/days/months/years to an ultimate godlike superbeing.
Fucking finally.
>>66945712
thank you for this bitchin webm
>>66938116
That's my problem
Making a supercomputer that's hyper intelligent seems like something that carries a far greater risk than it's worth
Making sex robots doesn't seem worth it if it takes the creation of SKYNET to do
>>66939084
The end/beginning is nigh. About 14 years until singularity. We'll have the technology to mimic the human brain with all the bells and whistles, including emotions.
