Could I own a nuclear weapon in a libertarian society?
>>66904266
No because you'd be dead or a slave.
>>66904266
yes.
>>66904266
Apparently you can in USA. Any American can confirm?
>>66904266
>>66904266
Think you can afford one? Maintain one?
Stick with field artillery, it's cheaper, cheaper and easier to feed, and probably a whole lot more fun to own and shoot. Remember, much of the field artillery used in the US revolutionary war was privately owned.
>>66904724
SHALL
Yes, but it's illegal to use it.
>>66904759
If I'm a billionaire then yes, I'll build up an inventory of small nuclear arms and reinstate tyranny
I need a tsar bomba to protect me from the coloured folks /pol/ ;_;
>>66904266
Whats stopping me from banding together with a military group, take over some land and call it a country where i put up laws and tax people?
>>66904815
What bullshit, I assert my right to stand my ground.
>>66904909
The people.
>>66904842
>hide small nuke in air conditioned office building
>offer a dollar for every 100 dollars anyone can proved they have saved in their life
>detonate at peak time
>Americlap problems solved
>>66904266
Sure
Could you afford one, though?
>>66904815
YOU'RE TREADING ON ME STOP IT
>>66904909
why would people just let you tax them?
>>66904266
yes
>>66904266
You could, as in there would be no laws stopping you from doing so. But the market would probably not sell it to you. The free ownership and truly open markets would be the bastion on responsibility in keeping you from doing so.
>>66904909
What would stop you? The well armed group of free citizens who own that land rising up against your tyranny, that's who.
>>66904266
Honestly, your second amendment right should be enough to qualify owning a nuke, but it's prohibitively expensive and the government doesn't give a shit about an individual's rights in the present day, present time.
>>66904766
NOT
>>66905408
Not an argument.
>>66905497
Should an individual , if they were rich enough, be allowed to own a nuke?
>>66905497
>prohibitively expensive
Not for a billionaire.
Are there even any ancaps left on /pol/? I remember in 2011 we were filled with them.
>>66904909
>military campaigns burn money
>taxes are what enables WAR, not the other way around
>you will always be massively outnumbered by people with equal access to weapons
>suppliers will stop selling ammo and other stuff to your campaign over fear of losing the bigger market that is your opposition
>military conquest in this day and age means constant underground opposition, you will never get full control over the area, the area will never economically develop, the people will either fight or flee towards the closest non occupied area = you will never make back the money you spent on your initial campaign
>>66904266
Absolutely.
>>66905861
no they've all been laugh away. these guys are just being ironic
>>66904266
What's stopping you from owning one now?
>>66905861
Anarcho capitalism is a meme
Also
>rare
>>66905861
I have seen a couple of them floating about over the past few weeks
>>66904266
if we give everyone a nuclear warhead there will be no crime
>>66906164
This. As long as there are good guys with nukes, the bad guys cant nuke anyone else
>>66906265
>the bad guys cant nuke anyone else
unless they have no regard for their own life
>>66904266
Yes
>>66904916
Don't know why I laughed so much at this
>>66904266
You can own it but can't use it unless you are defending yourself from a threat that requires you to use it.
>>66904266
No because you cannot control who the victims are when you detonate it.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
>>66906677
What if I use it anyway?
yes, you can own it and use it; that is the beauty of a libertarian society
>>66906677
Who is going to stop me using it? I'll just nuke them.
>>66908245
technically the whole world is a libertarian society.
gov is the result of the strong overcoming the weak
>>66904266
Nope, but your owner might own few nukes.
>>66904759
>much of the field artillery used in the US revolutionary war was privately owned
B-but muh muskets
>>66909579
ALLOWED
