Can anyone explain to be why all the mega TV liberals and SJW are against Berine?
Colbert, John Oliver, Bill Mayer, New Oga Boga from Daily Show, Comedy Central in General.
All these were MAX OBAMA last two elections.
Yet now they're not really saying anything. Most of them say good things about Shillary but no one really endorses anyone why is that?
Anyone?
And again...
My last try...
>>66879672
Good
Get out and take grandpa commie with you
MAGA
>>66880009
But I'm not even American I can't vote just interested.
The medias try to shame trump into the ground looks at libercuck Oliver first accusing the republicans of doing a desperation measure to kill Trump before going on a 22 minute rant about how he changed his name
>>66878398
they are purchased
>>66878398
Deep down inside they all are afraid of endorsing any specific candidate it seems. Why? I don't exactly know. It's like they don't know what to do or say.
You think Hillary would stop at just buying the superdelegates? Like Rubio, she is the candidate her party's establishment can cash more favors out of with less hassle.
Obama was a great choice back in 2008, he was a living race card immune to any real controversy, despite not even being much better than Bush. But now their default choice has to be Hillary for her electability and lack of scruples, no way you can cash in on Sanders without him playing hard to get on stuff the party considers bullshit.
1. Hillary is a woman (allegedly), therefore immune to criticism
2. Hillary is the establishment candidate, which the talking heads on TV take their orders form
3. Promoting an Old White Male (although Bernie's Jewish) goes against the liberal narrative
4. Open socialism is a bit too much for the average American to handle, the indoctrination must be subtle and gradual
>>66878398
The same reason Trump is so popular among Republicans, they're sick of the establishment status quo.
Regardless of what /pol/ Trump shilling has you believe, Sanders is the second best candidate in the entire race (third if you count based Gary). He's said on multiple occasions that "he won't hide it, I'm campaigning for major change in both America and the Democratic Party."
He's also anti-TPP and anti-NAFTA like Trump is and every other candidate isn't. That alone will bring manufacturing jobs back from Mexico.
>>66881639
No no i totally understand that. What I failed to understand is that
Say Bill Maher he said
SINGLE PAYER HEALTHCARE IS THE ONLY WAY.
WHY AREN'T OUR COLLEGES FREE LIKE NORWAYS.
WHY ISN'T POT LEGAL.
Berine is for all of that yet Bill Maher the supposed super neutral liberal hippie that have 1 mil to obama last time harly ever mentiones bernie on his show. It's actually the guests that do it the most.
All the does is defend Obama and then he defends Hillaries scandals.
Menwhile Obama has been to every show ever yet won't come to his...
I don't understand it...
They literally got the Euro Socalists they've been all salviating about for a decade. Yet now that his here everyones just meh Berine...
>>66881639
Oh also hes an atheist and Bill really likes that shit.
But no Obama is the actual Atheist not the actual Atheist candidate.
>>66881856
That's why, though. The establishment includes the media.
Turner Broadcasting alone has donated millions to Hillary, so there's CNN in her favor. Most media conglomerates outside of Rupert Murdoch's ownership are liberal biased, and those liberals are going to support the establishment candidate. Same way Murdoch's companies support the latter.
When you run as an anti-establishment candidate, they're going to go for the balls and either ignore you like they do to Sanders, or constantly bash you like they do to Trump.
Any time you question anything about American politics, just ask yourself one question: Where's the money in it?
>>66878398
They are the Democrat establishment. They aren't the quixotic, free-thinking liberals that leftists imagine them to be.
For instance, HBO(Oliver, Maher) is owned by Time Warner which donated over $400,000 to Hillary's campaign.
>>66881856
Obama never really promised the kind of "revolution" (for lack of better word) that sanders is proposing.
The status quo was never really under threat with an Obama presidency. The media's strongest tool to destroying a political candidate is to just not talk about them at all.
I know this is conspiracy tier, but I believe that with sanders they're either told not to talk about him, or they simply don't really know much about him. It's quite easy to believe that EVERYONE must know about sanders since he's got such a vocal following on the internet. But lots of those surveys/polls etc. are showing that a lot of people don't even know who he is or what he stands for.
>>66883612
And as far as their MO for Hillary shilling, they probably don't want to be too obvious, since they will need the Bernie fags during the general.
They probably would rather take easy shots towards the right.
They are on big corporations paycheck and Bernie isn't fond of big corporations.
>>66878398
Can't tell if reddit bait, or just Russian and memes are 2-3 years behind.
It's because they shill for the establishment, who is shillary and whatnot.
Aside from reddit, no one actually wants a fucking communist as president.
maher definitely said that he prefers bernie over hillary.
>>66878398
It's very simple: these media personalities aren't part of the "left" in any sense that would have been recognizable before about 1975. They're just PC one-worlders, and they actually want right-wing economic policies because they're mostly rich. The thing you have to remember is that, in 2008, Obama actually ran well to the right of Clinton on economic issues. This was part of his appeal for the set of people you're talking about. A candidate who's opposing Clinton from the left and doing so entirely on economic issues is totally unappealing to them. They'd much rather live with Clinton, or else see someone like Bloomberg get into the race.
