http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/loretta-lynch-indicates-doj-not-required-to-charge-clinton/article/2585342
You cannot make this shit up.
>Attorney General Loretta Lynch indicated Wednesday that the law doesn't require the Justice Department to pursue criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email system, even if the FBI recommends criminal charges.
>Lynch was asked in a hearing by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, what her department would do if the FBI were to recommend that step. "If the FBI were to make a referral to the Department of Justice to pursue a case by way of indictment and to convene a grand jury for that purpose, the Department of Justice is not required by law to do so, are they — are you?" Cornyn asked.
>Lynch didn't answer directly, but seemed to indicate the department has some wiggle room, and can consult with officials before deciding what to do.
>"It would not be an operation of law, it would be an operation of procedures," Lynch said in reply. She added that the decision to pursue a criminal case would be "done in conjunction with the agents" involved in the investigation. "It's not something that we would want to cut them out of the process."
The president needs to be impeached. It is clear he lacks proper judgement and integrity.
Hillary has too many friends in high places to see prison. Some of these friends are just getting a bit concerned and playing their hand early.
>>66826304
The FBI doesnt bring cases to trial, you fucking moron, the DOJ does. The FBI recommending an indictment carries as much weight as the FBI advising NASA on the next space project
>>66826304
>>66826304
She's right, though. The FBI cannot force the Department of Justice to press charges. You can agree or disagree with that judgment, but it's not illegal.
>>66826608
>>66826996
So the FBI is wasting their time?
>>66826996
>>66826608
Another thing
If the FBI determines she broke the law, why WOULDN'T the DOJ bring charges
>>66827441
Because the democrat party is the most corrupt political machine in the world.
>>66827441
Because Hillary has friends in the DOJ. Although they won't have much of a choice, since ignoring an FBI recommendation would probably sink Hillary's campaign anyway by being so blatantly corrupt.
>>66826996
they don't have to, but it's very bad for the DoJ once the FBI starts only giving the DoJ the bare minimum of cooperation.
>>66826304
Doesn't really matter. The DOJ isn't required to but it would be a huge fucking deal if they don't. That's the crux
>>66826474
It's not just that she has these friends, it is also that many of these friends of hers are also involved in corruption and crime. They do not want them to uncover dirt on one because others may follow. It would completely destroy their nepotist foothold on corrupt politics. This is why they are so afraid of a Trump presidency.
>>66826304
>a criminal case would be "done in conjunction with the agents" involved in the investigation
>ZOMG DOJ CORRUPT HERP DERP
Jesus. You people are fucking buffoons.
>>66826608
>The FBI recommending an indictment carries as much weight as the FBI advising NASA on the next space project
Not really, since they are after all investigators. It would be more like a group of physicists advising NASA. It carries some weight.
>>66827441
Dude Lynch has all but said they wont do a fucking thing about it no matter how many laws Clinton broke.
Lets get this started
>america
>>66826304
The DOJ isn't required to prosecute anything
There's still a federal ban on marijuana but Obama told the DOJ to just ignore it
>>66826608
No ones arguing that you fuck. People are outraged they won't bring the charges up.
So when other government employees mismanage emails and classified materials can their defense attorneys cit hillary to avoid prosecution? Will this set a precedent that classified material can be misused without penatly?
>>66826304
>In other news, the Director of the FBI, top aides and hundreds of agents have resigned in mass while leaks by the hundreds detail the massive corruption scandal which indicates that Hillary Clinton used her position as the Secretary of State to put top secret information on an unsecured server in order to sell them to foreign governments giving massive donations to the Clinton Foundation.
>The Obama administration cannot be reached for comment, the White House is empty except for Donald Trump who is personally measuring the drapes in the Oval Office for when he assumes the presidency.
So what's to stop the FBI from returning the favor by simply doing shoddy investigation work when it comes to crimes committed by people Obongo doesn't like? Or leaking details of investigations?
>>66826304
>Loretta Lynch
Isn't that the bitch that thinks she can charge people for "hate speech"?
I AM SHOCKED! SHOCKED, I SAY! SHOCKED!
>>66826304
Our only hope is that the FBI carries through with it's threat to go public if the DoJ refused to go forward with the investigation.
Or at least that some Fed with a conscious leaks the info.
>>66826304
>>66826608
>>66827441
I thought it was the FBI that would revolt and release info if nothing happened
>>66828285
Obama could rightly fire them all for not doing their fucking jobs. Don't like it? Then too bad.
>>66828279
rhetorical question since the only "classified" materials found on Clinton's server were NOT classified at the time she sent them.
Not that that means anything to the Shitheads™ on pol who are trying to imply anyhing else.
>>66830744
>if you send information away before its classified its not treason
>>66830744
weren't they caught removing the markings?
>>66830744
>I don't understand classification: the post
If you take classified material, and send it as an email, you have sent classified material. It was classified at the time, even without the markings
There was nothing retroactive about it
You have never tried for a security clearance this is seriously the most entry level stuff
>>66832196
it's the midle of the fucking night swedebro
go to sleep
you're talking nonsense.
>>66826608
Its like none of these fuckers ever watched a law and order episode intro
>>66833018
>It was classified at the time, even without the markings
can you quote a NYT level of confirmation on this.
or are you just going to pull shit out of your ass from opinion pages of kikebart, freebacon, or conservitard shithouse
>>66833301
No, fuck you
>>66833710
>he thinks the NYT is an objective news source especially on Democratic politics.
>>66830744
She was in a position to know what is classified before sending it.
>>66833710
Yeah cause that's how it works people just email shit all over the place then decide its a government secret.
>>66832802
Yea multiple times
>a nation of laws
>except when its inconvenient
>>66826304
That's what happens when you put niggers in charge of justice
shillary is like an episode of house of cards
>>66833710
>NYT
That's not even a good attempt at shitposting m8
