https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-hillary-clinton-is-unlikely-to-be-indicted-over-her-private-email-server/2016/03/08/341c3786-e557-11e5-b0fd-073d5930a7b7_story.html
>wapo opinions
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions
>/opinions
>>66788855
Jeff Bezos needs H1-B workers.
>>66788855
>washingtonpost
>By Ruth Marcus
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Marcus_(journalist)
>Category: American Jews
EVERY TIME
>EVERY TIME
EVERY TIME
>EVERY TIME
EVERY TIME
>EVERY TIME
EVERY TIME
>EVERY TIME
>>66788855
Is he holding a piss jug?
>>66788911
I can promise you the feds in charge of the investigation are more in line with this bitch than your teatard echo-chamber amateur legal theories
read it if you want to actually learn something, cuck
>>66789155
nice ad-hom :^)
>>66789237
are you new?
>>66789237
It's a cum bottle you newfag.
>baww she didn't know the documents in her server were classified
Irrelevant.
>Mrs. Clinton has reported that she is computer illiterate, perhaps did not know what she was doing - attempting plausible deniability.
>However, according to Judge Andrew P. Napolitano: "...in this sensitive area of the law, plausible deniability is not an available defense; no judge would permit the assertion of it in legal fillings or in a courtroom, and no lawyer would permit a client to make the assertion. This is so for two reasons. First, failure to safeguard state secrets is a crime for which the government need not prove intent. The failure can be done negligently. Thus, plausible deniability is actually an admission of negligence and, hence in this case, an admission of guilt, not a denial.
>"Second, Clinton signed an oath under penalty of perjury on Jan. 22, 2009, her first full day as a secretary of state. In that oath, she acknowledged that she had received a full FBI briefing on the lawfully required care and keeping of state secrets. Her briefing and her oath specified that the obligation to safeguard state secrets is absolute - it cannot be avoided or evaded by forgetfulness or any other form of negligence, and that negligence can bring prosecution".
>Former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey believes that there is enough evidence to justify criminal charges against Mrs. Clinton and to bring a conviction for mishandling classified information: "... from her direction that classification rules to be disregarded, to the presence on her personal email server of information at the highest level of classification, to her repeated falsehoods of a sort that juries are told every day may be treated as evidence of guilty knowledge - it is nearly impossible to draw any conclusion other than she knew enough to support a conviction at the least for mishandling classified information".
>>66789724
>believing the "legal scholarship" of partisan hacks
kek
>>66790024
nice ad-hom :^)
>>66790165
Not really, Napolitano is a Fox employee and Mukasey was a political appointee under Bush
I'm arguing they have a conflict of interest.
>>66788855
the comment section is hilarious. I especially love that someone is shilling the following pasta like mad there
>Think about this. When you send an email, you tend to see the email address of the person who sent you the email and therefore, where it is going in reply. So, are the Republicans saying that no one in the US Government ever noticed that Hillary was using her own email account? That is absurd on the face of it. Of course everyone knew this. Everyone. Now, who in the State Dept would send Hillary a "Classified" or "Top Secret" email knowing it was not a State Dept of US Gov't email account? Who at the NSA or CIA would do that? No one, is the answer. No one did. That is why this is such a bogus situation pumped up by schmucks like Darrell Issa and Trey Gowdy, two Repub inbred sociopaths.
im expecting this to be repeated in /pol/ soon enough
>>66790565
nice ad-hom, part 2 :^)
>Ruth Marcus is married to former Federal Trade Commission Chairman and Democrat Jon Leibowitz
>Jonathan David Leibowitz (born June 17, 1958) was the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), an independent agency of the United States Government.[1] He was sworn in as a Commissioner on September 3, 2004, and designated Chairman on March 2, 2009 by President Barack Obama. In 2012, the U.S. Senate confirmed Liebowitz's appointment for a second term. He resigned effective February 15, 2013.
remember kids: democrats cannot be biased towards democrats :^)
>>66790841
I'm talking about the law professor she quotes
>“There are plenty of unattractive facts but not a lot of clear evidence of criminality, and we tend to forget the distinction,” American University law professor Stephen Vladeck, an expert on prosecutions involving classified information, told me. “This is really just a political firestorm, not a criminal case.”
>>66791053
then forget it's Napolitano and assume it's some Albanian trash picker making those arguments
why is he wrong?
after all, even a broken clock is right twice a day
Actually, that's good kinda. If Hillary isn't tried, takes the nomination, THEN tried, you would have a very broken democratic party. I hope that happens, and Trump wins with Gary Johnson pulling second.
>>66791469
it's in the article lol
>>66791757
>ctrl + F "napolitano"
>no results
k den
>>66788855
>Because the faggot writing the article knows what the FBI knows
She is going to burn
>>66791868
Pretend it's some albanian trash picker and read the article, senpai
>>66792557
you said it's in the article
it's not
rest in peace
>>66788855
>washington post
>shill comments
If there actually were no legal basis, it wouldn't be in the Opinion section
>>66795163
#rekt
