I have not seen a racist here back up his words with facts.
>>66686288
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43
https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/the-bell-curve.pdf
https://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
>>66686288
Lurk more.
>>66686513
First post best as usual
Despite coming from
A FUCKING LEAF
>>66686288
Facts are racist
>>66686288
Hello, newfriend.
>>66686642
Shut up, nazi.
>>66686288
Probably because you either fail to pay attention, or ignore things that do not fit your narrative.
>>66686642
Thanks Achmed!
>>66686288
Oh boy, another bait thread. Any bets on the OP never showing up again?
>>66686288
this is because you are ignoring them because it hurts your feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeels
overcome your feeeeels and you will find THE TRUTH
WELCOME
>>66686288
Leshitstirrringface.png
>>66686288
>1 post by this user
Probably because you're not even sticking around to read your actual threads.
You're doing what I call "pretending to be open-minded" everyone on the Internet does this. They disagree with something and demand facts or a source and then immediately dismiss anything given to them. They're pretending they're objective and looking at all the information because it makes them look better or so they think, when they actually aren't. They're just self-righteous shitposting to feel smarter than people they think are dumb.
>>66686288
Half the violent crime in the US is committed by blacks. Fact.
>>66686288
>we're racist son
>why dad?
>because we're white
Perfect illustration of how the libcuck mind works.
>>66687880
Worst part is, it's anonymous.
>>66688068
Pretty damn much.
>>66686288
Anyone that uses the word racist to denigrate white people is just an anti-white faggot.
>>66686288
>facts
Left wing doesn't care about facts, they're all about 'theories'
>>66686288
Niggers smell. What verification would you need for that? Does your nose not work?
>>66686513
Most Murderers are black despite making up only 13% of the population
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime-in-the-u.s.-2014/tables/expanded-homicide-data/expanded_homicide_data_table_3_murder_offenders_by_age_sex_and_race_2014.xls
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EsZ11VVdP_M
>Lynn first looked at the Australian Aborigines in his 1978 chapter - it listed 3 studies, and he estimated their intelligence, much like Sub-Saharan Africans, as 85. In 1991 the same three studies were listed, and there is no suggestion Lynn lowered his estimate. When Ed Miller examined studies of Australoid intelligence in 1996, he too suggested something like 85. In comparison RDiI now lists data from 29 studies of Australoid populations, including those of New Guinea for a combined sample of 4,785. Since that time Lynn has dropped the Australoid IQ average a dramatic 23 points, down to 62. This is considerably lower than all previous estimates have suggested, but Lynn's review also highlights just how neglected this populations intelligence has been, even by Lynn, until now. Small admixture and adoption studies exist for Australian Aborigine intelligence and both suggest something hereditary. These populations have had some of the lowest technological development of all populations and also have the smallest brains of any living population. An exception is the visual parts of the cortex, which are much larger than in Europeans. Interesting given their much lower intelligence, then, that their visual memory abilities are substantially superior - one researcher found a visual memory IQ of 119. Genetics are further suggested because the advantage is also true for very young children and for aborigines born into modern urban settings.
http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2006/02/world-of-difference-richard-lynn-maps.php
