>>66659473
White privilege
>>66659473
free speech
>>66659473
and mansplaining
multiculturalism
welfare
Ugh
Otherizing
Trickle-down economics oppress people of colour
>>66659554
/thread
rape
Current year
Racism
ummmm...
problematic
Bigots
Manspreading and the rigged economy are the reasons for institutional racism by white supremacists
whitesplaining
>>66659473
problematic
The Consensus of Futility: Modernism, precultural appropriation and
feminism
1. Discourses of collapse
If one examines material nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either
reject Baudrillardist simulacra or conclude that culture may be used to
reinforce sexism, given that art is distinct from culture. Material nationalism
states that context comes from communication.
free education
These developments are problematic towards the creation of a society that is safe for people of color and non binary genders.
The characteristic theme of the works of Smith is a substructuralist whole.
Foucault promotes the use of dialectic theory to read sexual identity.
If one examines the posttextual paradigm of discourse, one is faced with a
choice: either reject capitalist discourse or conclude that context must come
from the collective unconscious, but only if art is distinct from reality.
Problematic Drumpf bigots oppress people of color using white privilege
Thus, Lacan suggests the use of dialectic theory to deconstruct class
divisions. The subject is interpolated into a posttextual paradigm of discourse
that includes language as a paradox.
NIGGER
>>66659473
Problematic MRA mansplains manspreading while fart-raping POC
The intercalation of white privilege in modern society has impoverish the efforts of minorities to climb the income gap and the cis-white male media tries to pin the downfall on black culture as being the main culprit of poverty among african-americans instead of the racial profiling that occurs on a day to day basis.
I speak jew.
In the works of Smith, a predominant concept is the distinction between
within and without. But if the posttextual paradigm of discourse holds, we have
to choose between Derridaist reading and postcultural discourse. The main theme
of the works of Smith is a constructive reality.
“Sexual identity is intrinsically unattainable,” says Foucault. In a sense,
Bailey[3] suggests that we have to choose between textual
Marxism and the capitalist paradigm of discourse. If Batailleist `powerful
communication’ holds, the works of Smith are empowering.
>clears throat
Intersectionality
>>66659473
Systemic
Seriously they have a fucking hard-on for that word don't they?
1. The cultural paradigm of context and subcapitalist nationalism
“Class is a legal fiction,” says Lacan. The main theme of Finnis’s[1] analysis of materialist appropriation is not narrative, but
prenarrative.
Therefore, Werther[2] holds that we have to choose
between surrealism and the prepatriarchial paradigm of consensus. Bataille’s
model of dialectic discourse suggests that society, perhaps surprisingly, has
intrinsic meaning.
>>66660156
nice
2. Contexts of genre
“Culture is intrinsically dead,” says Lyotard; however, according to
Tilton[3] , it is not so much culture that is intrinsically
dead, but rather the futility of culture. But Sartre uses the term ‘the
subconstructive paradigm of consensus’ to denote a mythopoetical whole. The
primary theme of the works of Fellini is the role of the participant as poet.
Therefore, in Amarcord, Fellini examines semantic predialectic
theory; in 8 1/2 he denies surrealism. Any number of discourses
concerning a self-justifying totality may be found.
However, the main theme of Drucker’s[4] critique of the
subconstructive paradigm of consensus is not semioticism, as subcapitalist
nationalism suggests, but postsemioticism. The premise of the subconstructive
paradigm of consensus holds that language is used to exploit minorities, but
only if Sontag’s essay on surrealism is valid.
Thus, if subcapitalist nationalism holds, we have to choose between textual
discourse and precapitalist cultural theory. Hubbard[5]
suggests that the works of Rushdie are postmodern.
micro-agressions
ooga booga shoop da hoop muffuga bix nood
DEPARTMENT OF GENDER POLITICS, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
1. Contexts of fatal flaw
“Society is part of the genre of consciousness,” says Foucault. An abundance
of desublimations concerning neodialectic appropriation may be revealed. But
Marx uses the term ‘material capitalism’ to denote a self-supporting totality.
Postcultural discourse suggests that the goal of the artist is
deconstruction. It could be said that if the subdialectic paradigm of consensus
holds, the works of Joyce are empowering.
Baudrillard promotes the use of textual nationalism to challenge colonialist
perceptions of truth. However, the main theme of the works of Joyce is the
difference between class and language.
TRIGGERED
understanding systems of oppression
>>66659473
Privilege
manwinning - when men win at everything because superior
Toxic power structures lead to negatively impactful social norms where cisgendered people can reap heteronormative benefits all while simultaneously restabilizing problematic hegemonic masculinity
>>66660464
I hate my school
As a trans-atlantic fruity butch queer demi-robot-elf-kin who suffers from severe post-traumatic stress-over-patriarchy disorder, your obscene problematic violation of my safe space triggers me. I ask that you refrain from such problematic and nonchalant behaviour in the future so that i can continue to fight for LGBTWTFBBQ+ rights.
Also, i took the liberty of replacing the vandalism on your bumper by placing a Hillary sticker over the disastrous Trump sticker you had.
Thank you.
>>66659473
I'm a discriminated pan-trans-comic-sansSexual Lesbian Progressive libertarian communist who sexually identifies as a liquid snake gender fluid queer shemale Lesbian of color.
>>66659473
Does anyone else think that Trump's neocolonialist attitude dictates this "culture of microaggressions" that alienates real voices on subjects such as rape culture, gender-binary privlege, unattainable standards of beauty, and our LGBTQUIA+ brothers, sisters, and siblings*?
>>66659951
>>66660013
>>66660234
>>66660173
>>66660344
>>66660464
Tbh this is good but more leaning towards postmodernist babble more than anything
I think the OP meant something like, make a headliner for Bitch.com or Jezebel or Salon, e.g
Disrupting the white manosphere through empowered POC quasigender feminist experiences.
You are a racist bigot OP. How dare you use your white privilege to create such an obnoxious thread??
VN get
i am ronda rousey
>>66661027
Kek, well done
>>66659473
Virgin neckbeard Hitler
Bigot check your white privilege and stop objectifying women. We need more diversity not islamophbia racists black lives matter white people will never know what its like. Global warming is real and it is the biggest issue in the world. Sis gender scum. Stop being racist white scum Whitey kill all police he diddent do muffin. Patriarchy.
THIS MAN PREACHES HATRED.
also, safe spaces.
>>66659473
Black lives matter.
We must oppress systematic and socially constructed racism for the future of our children by remaining on the right side of history.
White women CANT be feminists
White privilege causes structural systematic sexist islamophobic racist discrimination.
>>66659473
Basically you're just white-splaining with your privilege to me at this point because I'm a proud LGBTQRECON native-american-kin who's feeling very triggered by your euro-centric neocolonialist opinions please refrain from using hatespeech in my safe-space shitlord Pizza rolls not gender rolls okay can this bigot be any more like Hitler?
Which, in 2016, is very problematic
>>66659473
White chocolate is oppressive
Feminism is about equality. You can't expect us to fix men's problems, do it yourselves. OMG, look at those MRA's, fucking sexist pathetic misogynists
Problematic privileged bourgeois triggered mansplaining.
>>66660464
I've got a feeling this anon reads Zizek and other such nonsense.
>>66659473
According to inter-sectional critical race theory, patriarchy patriarchy kill whitey
>>66659473
Because it's 2016 the problematic privileged shitlords must be smashed
We need to start a conversation about the problematic appropriation and whitewashing of black female bodies by the phallocentric American media.
>>66662462
I had to look up intersectionality recently, because I had never heard that shit until last year.
Holy fuck that has to be one of the most copout claims I've ever heard.
HURR LITERALLY EVERYTHING IS OPPRESSION AND IT'S ALL CONNECTED
The pendulum cannot swing back hard enough right now.
>>66659473
>Heteroproblematic dialectical tumblkin pissbaby of colour.
______ is Hitler.
College is NOT about creating an intellectual space. It's about creating a home.
>>66659473
GO PLAY IN TRAFFIC!!!!!!!! YOU SHOULD QUIT CRITICIZING POMOAMOROUS, BI & OMNISEXUAL-ALIGNED VEGETARIANS, YOU CISHET-NORMATIVE RAPIST!!!!! SCREW YOUR FUCKING THIN SUPERIORITY, YOU CIS-OVERPRIVILEGED BINARIST!!!!!!!! I'M CRYING RIGHT NOW, YOU THIN-PRIVILEGED ASSHOLE!!!!! u should fucking accept that u can be fat & healthy!! respect that i'm gyneromantic today, you hetero-privileged basement dweller!!! you'll literally never understand my fucking androplatonic vegetarian issues!!! CHECK YOUR CIS PRIVILEGE!!!!!!! leave bear goatkins the fuck alone, you cisgender-normative non-ethnic-elitist truscum!!!!!!!! i'm literally 100% done. never reblog my posts ever again.
ABLEISM
The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power.
>>66659709
you are doing it wrong FAGGOT NIGGER
If, for a while, the ruse of desire is calculable for the uses of discipline soon the repetition of guilt, justification, pseudo-scientific theories, superstition, spurious authorities, and classifications can be seen as the desperate effort to “normalize” formally the disturbance of a discourse of splitting that violates the rational, enlightened claims of its enunciatory modality.
As my story is an august tale of fathers and sons, real and imagined, the biography here will fitfully attend to the putative traces in Manet’s work of “les noms du père,” a Lacanian romance of the errant paternal phallus (”Les Non-dupes errent”), a revised Freudian novella of the inferential dynamic of paternity which annihilates (and hence enculturates) through the deferred introduction of the third term of insemination the phenomenologically irreducible dyad of the mother and child.
Natural history museums, like the American Museum, constitute one decisive means for power to de-privatize and re-publicize, if only ever so slightly, the realms of death by putting dead remains into public service as social tokens of collective life, rereading dead fossils as chronicles of life’s everlasting quest for survival, and canonizing now dead individuals as nomological emblems of still living collectives in Nature and History. An anatomo-politics of human and non-human bodies is sustained by accumulating and classifying such necroliths in the museum’s observational/expositional performances.
>>66663224
kek
>>66659473
>If you don't think women should not have the constitutional right to murder children in the womb you're on the WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY and also a racist
WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP WHEN WILL THIS MEME STOP
Total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the exterior absolute the absolute existent (of that of which it is not possible to univocally predicate an outside, while the equivocal predication of the outside of the absolute exterior is possible of that of which the reality so predicated is not the reality, viz., of the dark/of the self, the identity of which is not outside the absolute identity of the outside, which is to say that the equivocal predication of identity is possible of the self-identity which is not identity, while identity is univocally predicated of the limit to the darkness, of the limit of the reality of the self). This is the real exteriority of the absolute outside: the reality of the absolutely unconditioned absolute outside univocally predicated of the dark: the light univocally predicated of the darkness: the shining of the light univocally predicated of the limit of the darkness: actuality univocally predicated of the other of self-identity: existence univocally predicated of the absolutely unconditioned other of the self. The precision of the shining of the light breaking the dark is the other-identity of the light. The precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in “self-alienation,” not “self-identity, itself in self-alienation” “released” in and by “otherness,” and “actual other,” “itself,” not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the...
>>66662678
desu I would wash those asses in white m8.
Democratic socialist
reading this makes me cringe.
DEATH TO THE LEFT
HEIL HITLER
race is a social construct
~*GET BENT!!!!!!!*~ how fucking difficulT IS IT 2 JUST RESPECT THAT GENDER EXOTIFICATION IS LITERALLY TRIGGERING ME!!!!!! (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*: ･ﾟ u can be an androphile radfem & still have. thin fucking privilege!!!!!! U SHOULD QUIT REJECTING BLACK-ASSOCIATING SURVIVORS, U MIDDLE CLASS-OVERPRIVILEGED LOSER!!!!!! (◕﹏◕) currently im a foxkin, so address me as "tho/thong/thors" & not "jee/jem/jeir", u cisgender-normative chauvinist!!!!!! why is it so hard for u 2 respect gender. neutrality, u gender-privileged neckbeard!!!!!!!! stop erasing UNDERPRIVILEGED, POLYSPECIES & NONROMANTIC-ALIGNED TRANSMEN!!!!!! feel free 2 unfollow &/or block/ignore me.
