What did he mean by this?
That the global warming con is part of the globalist agenda to ruin the West.
>>66569172
that other nations stop having big factories because they pollute massivly
the best thing we can do it to turn this against china, and making them our producing bitches
>>66569172
He means that it's a way to trick the US into sabatoging its industrial strength while China laughs at us
>>66569172
He's a retard.
China did not invent anything, they are a large producer of it though.
>>66569172
Nibiru. Global warming is not real.
Human beings affect climate change to a negligible extent. We have virtually no power over the climate, which is on a long term cooling trend.
Due to the climate change panic of Al Gore and the like we introduced all sorts of emissions restrictions which reduce productivity.
>>66569172
He isn't a scientist, but as a business person at his power-level, you become pretty good at detecting elements of hoaxes. This is probably not something he would repeat today and mean it.
The Chinese don't care about any international rule or regulation regarding clean air/clean environment. Like, google search "China" and "Smog," I'm sure the first result will look like something from a bad horror movie.
The US, operating under the same "we're sorry, stop being mad at us" zeitgeist that sees black lives being said to matter, intentionally hobbles itself in competition with unscrupulous nations that don't give a single fuck and use indentured and slave labor openly.
And while I don't think he's being honest or accurate in saying that these rules were created BY or FOR the Chinese, they certainly benefit from them, specifically because we act as if they're true and that we care.
>>66569172
Regulation stifles business in some cases. Production of a lot of pharmaceuticals and chemicals is becoming quickly outsourced because China and India can make our final products much dirtier and using less "green" methods, which is usually much cheaper. That being said, I feel at least some regulation is necessary for us to have a clean standard of living in our first world countries
>>66569462
>We have virtually no power over the climate
Then why did we cause it to change?
>>66569172
CHYNA
>>66569696
Man-made global warming is beyond retarded. Post actual evidence and not infographic-tier pseudo science.
>>66569696
We didn't though. Unless you're saying the climate only changes when human activity is involved, which would be a very foolish statement to make.
>>66569172
>>66569172
He says that global warming fanboys are costing Americans jobs.
>>66569999
QUADS HAS SPOKEN
>>66569172
Americans companies have to spend money to meet regulations because save da erf. Chinese continue to pump out pollution and sell cheap goods.
>>66569172
it might also just be an excuse to issue carbon tax credits as direct capital injections into american non-manufacturing industries that we will then sell to china and japan
>>66569172
>What did he mean by this?
Global warming has been used as justification to impose strict environmental regulations on western industry. So much to the point that it has become unprofitable to start new factories in our countries. The end result being major manufacturers have moved their businesses over seas, first to china, and now to countries like the Philippines. Why is it cheaper in asia? The media narrative implies that chinese do work for less money, which is true.
But it isn't the reason entire industries were moved. The real reason is china has extremely lax environmental regulations, and not a single western power has held them to account. Pollution is so bad in china that the majority of air pollution received in the west coast of the united states is air pollution that has been blown across the ocean from china.
Like the holocaust, global warming is a hoax. Certainly, climates change, and localized pollution does effect the environment, but the crux of the argument is faulty. It is based on lies. Lies designed to push forward the globalist agenda by disinfranchising americans in order to prop up more favorable business ventures in other countries in order to destabilize our own. And the worst part is, it is not helping the environment in any way, shape, or form. The pollution is simply being displaced to another part of the world, and if you believe the climate change narrative, then the disasters we are supposedly stopping by not polluting the environment in the usa are still going to happen since even more pollution is happening in china.
>>66569493
daily reminder; cfcs were outlawed in order to prevent third world countries from developing their own cheap refrigeration technologies, so that they would forever be incapable of staging their own industrial revolutions and becoming self sufficient and independent. It also keeps prices high for basic consumer goods for regular americans/europeans.
Recycling, in general, also is a long con. It's a giant subsidy for the related industries, basically paying them to process their own waste, turning what use to be a financial burden into a financial boon at the expense of the tax payers.
The environmental movements of the 80s and 90s were giant scams which have had long lasting effects on our society. None of which include making the environment better, cleaner, or safer.
>>66571635
you've gone off the deep end, idiot
third world countries are full of 70 iq idiots who blow themselves up. we didn't need to outlaw refridgeration to stop them from developing. they can't even build water pipes, elt alone abstract shit like refridgerators
recycling is NOT a con, look at old iron mines vs new ones. you used to be able to pull car sized chunks of metal out of the ground, now we melt through 30 tons of sand just to get a chunk of iron out of the ground, digging up entire mountains
you. are. dumb.
>>66571635
an actual retard or troll?
>>66571965
>u r dumb
>i better say it twice because thats what my propagand guidelines say to do
Third world countries now are full of 70 iq idiots that blow themselves up, but they didn't use to be. Decades of civil war and brain drain as the smarter blacks fled the continent did that.
Recycling IN GENERAL YOU ILLITERATE NIGGER, is a con. Telling some stupid goy to pay 10 cents extra on plastic, glass, and allunimum soda bottles and then promising to give them some of the money back if they take it to a good goy recycling center is a fucking scam.
The CONCEPT is sound, the EXECUTION is a con. Why the fuck should you or I directly pay for coca cola's material costs?
>>66572225
why were cfcs outlawed, anon?
>>66569271
No, good try though. Not really it is a shit analysis.
>>66569462
This. It is the ultimate hubris of man to assume we are responsible for changing the climate.
>>66569172
that a 1 degree temperature difference is a minute issue in comparison to the islands of garbage floating in the seas
>>66569172
He meant that the concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.
>>66569172
I think it's the other way around though, since the west tries to impose it on China and they say fuck off.
>>66569172
He just told the truth and has not been shot.
Not even Hitler cucked the Jews this hard.
>>66569172
He is saying you can not complete with someone who doesn't follow the same rules.
The idea is that the West will cut back production to reduce greenhouse effects, gradually making China the center of production in the global marketplace. In effect, America would be handicapping its own industrial might while China gives the middle finger to the world in regards to environmentalism.
The reality is the Chinese on all levels of society and government take pollution very seriously, but the truth is they don't know how to let go of coal. If they cut back, thats it for their economy. If they keep the status quo going, eventually the people are going to revolt because nobody wants to live in smog.
>>66569696
>Then why did we cause it to change?
You mean why it gets cooler? Because of the sun's 206 year cycle.
CO2 is plant food, btw.
