[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Is the modern military cuck? Our military is not allowed to
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 71
Thread images: 8
File: cucks.jpg (60 KB, 640x403) Image search: [Google]
cucks.jpg
60 KB, 640x403
Is the modern military cuck?

Our military is not allowed to execute or even assault terrorists. Most of our firefights in the Middle East are done from like 1/2 mile to a mile away. Often times our soldiers just let them go whereas back in the day they would be hunted down or rushed and charged with bayonets.

How soft is the military of the West now?
>>
What do you expect when western militaries are feminized and scrutinized like crazy.

Just look at ancient Greece.

The more "peaceful" greek city states flopped over and joined the persian hoard. The more strict and war like greek city states teamed and fought relentlessly against the invasions.
>>
>>66278962
>rushing a gun line is better than bombing the shit out of them
Uh.. what?
>>
>>66278962
I know you're a baiting retard, but...
>Charge the enemies with bayonets, likely into an ambush, when we can waste them from a half mile away and never leave the position, taking no casualties.
>>
>>66278962

>whereas back in the day they would be hunted down or rushed and charged with bayonets.

So they can feign retreat and ambush our advancing forces every fucking time like in Vietnam(which we lost, btw)? No, we just fight less retardedly now.

Our total casualties for both the Iraq and Afghan interventions aren't even 20% what we had in Vietnam, whereas we've killed fuckloads (which is a shitty metric) and been fighting for 15 years now. As for winning the "Global War on Terror"? Uh, no one knows actually.
>>
>>66278962
>doesn't know how modern military operates
>shit posts anyway

Are you sure you're not shilling from Australia?
>>
>>66278962
Umm... Apachez 'n' shiet. Rifles are just for self-defense/suppression.
A10>Helo>Arty>Mortar>Carl-G.
>>
>>66279593

Seems pretty weak. We literally punish our own soldiers for killing the enemy. Even if you suspect someone as a terrorist you can't kill them until they engage you in combat. Then if they surrender you have to take them.
>>
>>66279983
Seems pretty weak to kill nearly 40000 iraqi fighters and only lose about 4500 Americans? Not to mention we've fucked up their country for decades to come. Nothing weak about blowing a guys head off from a mile away or destroying an entire apartment with a jdam
>>
>>66278962

>Old military
>KILL THE NAZIS AND DEFEND THE JEWS AT ALL COSTS!
>Current military
>Remove kebab

Old military was turbo good goyim
>>
>>66278962
The modern US military is made up of welfare cases and straight up faggots, they got their asses kicked by literal mud people in Afghanistan and Iraq, then they come back to the states and whine.
>muh ptsd
>mum protecting freedom

In reality they are pussies, and I can't wait for China to just lay waste to them.
>>
>>66281489

I knew a black dude from work that was collecting $1200 a month in benefits from the VA for "disability" yet he was working 80 hours a week. He said he was guaranteed the money for like the next 10 years or some shit.
>>
>>66280989
good goyim
>>
>>66279983
You can blame Geneva for that.
>>
>>66281624
>>working 80 hours a week
Sounds like a good dude
>>
>>66278962

From the inside, yes. At least, I can speak for the US military.

There are two kinds of men and one kind of woman in the US Armed Forces.

A. The Aesthetic Faggot who spends all their free time at the gum getting jacked and being too concerned with having pretty definition to do real work.

B. The soft faggots that don't work and whine when they're forced to.

C. Sluts who get away with literally anything because they have a wet hole between their thighs.

Guys like me are the dying breed. The rough, calloused and surly soldier of the past is dying out. The last vestiges of that mentality were lost when they started all the PC shit in basic training. The faggots coming in now are so goddamn pathetic that they make beta orbiters look like mountain men. No one does work and half of all training is centered on feelings and shit.

The modern military is so bound up in being politically correct that we can't find the time to train warriors. Everyone who isn't a sack of worthless shit is either retiring, being kicked out for substance abuse, or being drummed out medically for picking up the slack for all the useless lumps.
>>
>>66279522
Leave troll
>>
>>66278962
>How soft is the military of the West now?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WC36u2xha5Y
>>
>>66283616
>Train warriors
That's because there is literally no point for your job to exist when we have drones now. You're a peace keeping force. You "emasculated" men seem to be doing a good job and killing brown people anyway.
>>
>>66284046
>You "emasculated" men seem to be doing a good job and killing brown people anyway

Please.

The only people that brown people need to worry about are other brown people.
>>
>>66285324
Point still stands.
>>
>>66278962
"just let them go"
...really nigger?
>>
>>66285324
I'm sure if you had a look at confirmed kills from either sides your military still comes out on top. Obviously your training and weapons are good enough that the men don't have to be depressed/PTSD driven alcoholics who don't have a life outside of military service
>>
Smart military's don't chase. Look at the Romans. When the most disciplined armies broke their enemies, and chased wildly after them when they routed, it often lead to traps or them getting killed when they moved in a disorganized fashion into the enemy who had regrouped by then.
>>
If we were really serious about the islamoterrorism war we would have glassed the entire middle east by now.
>>
>>66278962
>Often times our soldiers just let them go whereas back in the day they would be hunted down or rushed and charged with bayonets.

You have no understanding of history do you.

That shit stopped during WWI with technology. Wars were won through attrition or basically whoever had the most bodies wins.
>>
In 1945, after the failure of letting the diplomats make the 'permanent Versailles peace' with polite reparations etc; the victorious Allies instead of hanging Nazis from lampposts and other traditional postwar victory shenanigans, it was decided to let military lawyers have a go by inventing the concept of 'war crimes' and trials.
Afterwards we legally hung enough Nazis and went away happy to rebuild Europe...
But post 1945, now civilised armies are schooled by these military lawyers to invent rules of engagement and reasonable force etc etc... and no civilised army using these laws has ever won a war since...
>>
>>66278962
>tfw we dress like fags and our shits all retarded
>>
>>66281624
If you wanted to be a dick you could report him. They'll assign an IO to monitor.
>>
>>66278962
Who the fuck are they shooting if they're not allowed to assault terrorists?

You means one taken captive?
>>
If you took/held the objective, and they fled, what's the point of chasing and risking lives? If you've read much on siege warfare, you'd realize that it's about winning sieges and taking cities. Not battles. Battles are chaotic and history is full of tales of great armies being beaten by a smaller enemy. First one that comes to mind is Agincourt. You can win as many battles as you want, but unless you control the towns and cities where the fighters flee back to and have more children -etc. it won't matter.
>>
File: IMG_20160209_141700.jpg (668 KB, 2560x1920) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160209_141700.jpg
668 KB, 2560x1920
>>66278962

If you think firefights are only at 0.5-1mile away you clearly have no fucking idea what you're talking about.
>>
>mfw for every 100,000 bullets shot by Americans, a single insurgent is killed

Literally spray and pay on steroids.

Literally COD babbies shooting in a general direction half a mile away hoping to hit something with sheer luck
>>
>>66283616
You sound like a limp wristed rear d fag who's about to get chaptered out desu
>>
Remember:
>operation black sheild
>>
>>66286269
Of all the videos I've seen that's the vast majority but I guess close engagements are too fast paced to know to start recording anything probably I'll give you that
>>
>>66286323
What about live fire training?
I mean we could just firebomb everything like it's Dresden but that's not cool.
>>
File: 10352782.jpg (57 KB, 576x670) Image search: [Google]
10352782.jpg
57 KB, 576x670
>>66278962
They wouldn't recognize each other..
>>
File: image.jpg (47 KB, 400x400) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
47 KB, 400x400
Is the modern military cuck?

Our military is not allowed to execute or even assault rebels. Most of our lazerfights in the Outer Rim are done from like 1/2 parsec to a parsec away. Often times our soldiers just let them go whereas back in the day they would be hunted down or rushed and charged with blasters

How soft is the military of the Empire now?
>>
>>66286091
This desu. I wouldn't risk 1 of our soldiers to save some "innocent civilian" sandniggers.
Leave these savages to their own devices, and if they start getting uppity, bomb the shit out of them.
>>
>>66278962
>Often times our soldiers just let them go whereas back in the day they would be hunted down or rushed and charged with bayonets.
Yeah, no.
>>
if by cucked you mean we can turn mehmet into fine paste from a chair in pheonix arizona
>muh boots on da ground
>>
>>66286323
>what is suppression
>what is ranges
>what is live fire exercises
>what is detonating IEDs with rounds
>>
>>66280767
>Nothing weak about blowing a guys head off from a mile away or destroying an entire apartment with a jdam

>Dropping a $18k bomb on a dude who might make that in five years.
>>
>>66278962
The military in the West, primarily the U.S is controlled by people that aren't even in the military, and who have never even held a gun before, a.k.a lawyers and politicians.

If you let the generals have control the battlefield, the war would be over within a month.

But hey, let's keep the war going for 15 years because muh profits.
>>
>>66278962
>Most of our firefights in the Middle East are done from like 1/2 mile to a mile away

Because habeeb is a pussy and likes taking pot shots
>>
>>66278962
Now this shitposting. The object of war is to make the other guys die for their cause.

You can hunt people down with drones. And a lot of fighting happened in cities, not in the mountains. So your "mile away" stuff is wrong too.
>>
>>66286835
But think about your freedom goy! or are you a commie?
>>
>>66287608
Implying every rank above lieutenant colonel isn't a politician.
>>
>>66281489
This is false
>>
>>66278962
Our modern military IS cuck however in response to the "letting enemies 1/2 mile away get away" the reason for this is it is more dangerous to pursue than let them go. You probably are going to get blown up by like 4 times just trying to get to where they are for them to have vanished.

War is more complicated than it used to be.
>>
>>66287716

Literally no firefights are taking place from 1/2 mile to mile away, fyi
>>
>>66278962
Pure troll thread.. 8/20
>>
>>66281489
> muh ptsd
It isn't anymore prevalent than it was in past wars, the only difference is soldiers are encouraged to actually seek help this time around instead of resorting to heavy alcohol/spousal abuse.
>>
>>66281489

Our military is HEAVILY restrained. If the government ever took off the chains and said do whatever the fuck you want I'm extremely confident there is not a country in the world besides Russia that they would not be able to annihilate within a month.

If ROE's were removed The entire middle east would no longer exist. That is without Nukes.
>>
>>66288096
>Literally no firefights are taking place from 1/2 mile to mile away, fyi

literally you are correct
>>
>>66288096
1/5 of a mile. Better?
>>
>>66288264

This is absolutely correct. The military is currently without clear objectives and restrained. What we have proven is that we are horrible babysitters...the kids know how to fight.
>>
File: 16949671_SA.jpg (29 KB, 650x366) Image search: [Google]
16949671_SA.jpg
29 KB, 650x366
>>66278962
The US military is a completely different beast than it was 40 years ago.

Foreign Germanic people or people from Gaul sought refugee status in Rome and were eventually included into their military, it drastically hurt roman combat effectiveness.
>>
>>66280989
>current military
>remove kebab to defend the jews

USA literally worldscale jew bitch, and they are OK with that.
>>
>>66288605
No it didn't... Romans themselves had become soft from lack of threats at home. If anything Gaulish, Germanic and Iberian warriors is what kept the empire going.
>>
>>66288809
They actually aren't ok with thst
>>
File: 1454194321788.jpg (1 MB, 500x2780) Image search: [Google]
1454194321788.jpg
1 MB, 500x2780
>>66288931
Yes it did. They fought more like barbarian peoples than Romans.

>Romans themselves had become soft from lack of threats at home.
Just because they are better than their soft alternatives doesn't mean they were better than what the Roman military once was. And that's my point, America is Rome 2.0

>Americans themselves had become soft from lack of threats at home. If anything Mexican and Black gangbangers is what kept the empire going.
>>
>>66289213
>what is romanisation

How about you read a fucking book instead of playing half a total war campaign and spouting nonsense
>>
File: 1440043122478.jpg (633 KB, 1200x736) Image search: [Google]
1440043122478.jpg
633 KB, 1200x736
>>66289491
Your entirely missing my point. Romanisation brought them into the military and trained them in Roman military ways but they still remained people of the barbarian horde.

The US is no different and in future texts will probably have the word "Americanization" instead. We bring blacks, Mexicans and other foreigners into our military and they go though boot camp just the same. Doesn't change what they are and who they hold deep seated loyalties to.
>>
>>66289746
Your point was provincial soldiers reduced the effectiveness of the legions which is bullshit.
>>
>>66279983
>>66281846
Apparently there are cameras everywhere so they would know if you somehow accidentally killed a jihadist and their family.
>>
>>66290102
If your own people in your military betray you and more and more find common ground with your enemy what else would you call that?

Are you honestly trying to make the case that barbarians entering the military was a good thing for Rome in the long term?
>>
>>66278962
>How soft is the military of the West now?
After we took Iraq is when we went full Geneva bullshit.
And you can't blame that on Bushy that was 100% Congress right there
>>
>>66290360
Rome didn't even want to accept people from the rest of Italia into the Legions. How could one city man the entire empire?

I assume you're referring to teutoburg, of course there are teething problems which led to some massive disasters, but once province's became fully romanised they became a vital asset. Iberian troops where considered some of the best in the Empire and after the Legions withdrew Roman Britions still considered themselves Roman for a good while
>>
>>66279593
We lost Vietnam due to political reasons, on a military level we were vastly superior and wiping the floor with them.

That war was nothing but a massive sin for this nation and pulling out just as we were about to complete are goal make it the worst kick in the balls.
Thread replies: 71
Thread images: 8

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.