What does /pol/ think about Stefan Molyneux?
>>66125052
Not an argument tbf.
>>66125052
He's great but his videos are too fucking long.
He's trying to matter and in my opinion he's informative and he's getting objective thinking going again
>>66125164
>>66125200
Not an argument. -_-
ONE DOLLAR
N
E
F
U
C
K
I
N
G
D
O
L
L
A
R
cult leader
the fable games went to shit after the first one
>>66125052
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7XJIioZEgQ
>>66125052
go away stefan
I support him getting shot
>>66125373
/thread
>>66125335
See >>66125399
Also >>>/gif/
>>66125454
Not an argument. :(
Pretty racist guy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoGhz6Clpmk
>>66125052
His podcasts are actually pretty great if you listen to them at 1.3x speed with silence skipping on.
>>66125052
Informative and clearly a brilliant guy. Some of his recent debate videos have been subpar because only low quality people have been calling in, like flat-earthers, 9/11 conspiracy theorists, etc. If more people would call in, we'd get better content.
>>66125052
Cult leader and having his shit spammed on here is annoying.
>>66125052
I like that he identifies himself as being more philosophical than political and that he wants to teach people to evaluate ideas properly. It's a shame he goes for the low hanging fruit sometimes. Like that clueless Bernie supporter who just made Bernie supporters look bad. I'd like to see him debate someone equally as competent as him that believes in Bernie, not some clueless fuckwit and then label the video 'A conversation with a Bernie Sanders supporter'
>>66126299
not an argument
ONE
>>66126371
>competent
>bernie supporter
NOT
>>66125375
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWFoH1sG8DE
Retarded
>>66125052
AGAINST
>>66126371
>clueless Bernie supporter
if he had a clue, he wouldn't support bernie
>>66126781
pick one
>>66125052
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>>66126371
When he does debate people with linguistic skill he shows he's got real chops for civil discourse, but most people, even if they have arguments worth considering, don't know how to articulate them.
tl;dr: not an argument
>>66125052
I dont know if people post him here because its funny to spam "not an argument", which it kinda is
or
if its just to discredit him as some guy who spams his face here on some tawainese pictograph chatroom in order to get views.
But to answer, Overall I think he's a great person. He at least has a solid basis in philosophy, he's worked as an entrepreneur, takes care of his family, and really believes in what hes doing. I can at least respect that
more on point, he at least researches things very well and seems to have a gift for public speaking. He can be a bit weird about his AnCap stuff, but eh. Overall. Positive influence in the world
I agree with him on israel.
I see this thread every day I swear to god.
>>66128476
Im pretty convinced its just to post memes about him
