Democrats are registering new voters in Colorado by 2 to 1 against Republicans. At the current rate of registration, Democrats will overtake Republicans in Colorado by May.
2 FUCKING MONTHS FROM NOW, COLORADO WILL BE BLUE.
Le weedman state is going from red to blue, and it's a critical swing state.
What will you do, /pol/?
Do you live in Colorado? Have you registered?
Sources:
http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VoterRegNumbers/2015/December/VotersByPartyStatus.pdf
http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VoterRegNumbers/2016/January/VotersByPartyStatus.pdf
http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VoterRegNumbers/2016/February/VotersByPartyStatus.pdf
>>66032650
>2 FUCKING MONTHS FROM NOW, COLORADO WILL BE BLUE.
it was blue 10 years ago and last week, what's your point?
>>66032650
you assume 1 they have the numbers to keep up registration
and 2 that people registering in a state they dont live in wont go to jail before they can vote
I LIVE IN COLORADO AND DONT HAVE TIME TO READ OPS PIC
TELL ME WHAT I MUST DO
>>66032650
CO has been blue for 8 years, how is this news
It's because of Bernie silly.
When Hillary finally slaps him down the depression will set it.
I think this confirms legalizing weed only helps the obamas hillarys and bernies
Weed is socialism
>implying they'll vote
>implying they can keep this up
Why does this surprise you? People are literally moving here for DUDE WEED.
Colorado is rather evenly split between R D and Unaffiliated.
what's the /pol/ obsession with shitting on weed? we're actually being far less retarded than most states by legalizing recreationally.
i don't even smoke, i'm not talking about smokers because i know you guys think it's degeneracy, i'm talking about the law, it's a non-debatable issue, prohibition is retarded
>>66032650
>>66033555
>loss of 15 IQ points intensifies
>>66033555
I smoke it, but I'm annoyed that we're overcrowded for something literally so dumb because of it.
>>66032650
its literally the weed lmaos
>>66033555
since trump happened /pol/ has become 100% less intelligent. seriously don't bother posting unelss its a meme
>>66032650
Gee, couldn't possibly be because of the democrats having a nominating contest yesterday, could it?
>>66033555
I'm on board with that, but you can't really expect that Colorado will do other than attract trash until it becomes widespread. And then you have to wonder if they'll leave later on or just get stoned all day and sit right where they are.
>>66033555
Leftists like using it as a political tool
>>66032650
I am a colorado resident, I am not registered as a republican because I don't always agree with them. But this year I will be voting for him in the general election if the GOP doesnt cuck him
>>66034122
Just like right wingers use racism?
Colorado doesn't have a caucus or primary for Republicans so there's no point in them registering now. Their registration drive will extend over a much longer period leading up to the general election in November.
>>66034349
Leftists use race to divide us.
Thanks for the non sequitur argument though.
>>66033555
The edgy teenagers, I'm sure of it.
>MUH DEGENERAACYYYY
>im redpilled guys xD
>>66034455
In order to vote in the republican caucus in colorado you had to be registered republican by Jan 4
>>66034349
That's not what I see. Racism is the left's shtick. It's one of the real insults they have. Why not use it?
>>66033161
KILL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>66033646
isn't retardation 2 standard devs down? or are you implying that i smoke and lost iq points
>>66033690
we've always been fast growing, people have moved here to ski since the 70's, shit, my parents did. people have plenty of choices of legal states, oregon, washington, calolforneeah, nevahda, even the east coast now, we're just better than most of those places
>>66034113
colorado is full of some straight TRASH, like, the people that define "white trash"
>>66034122
at what point does a policy objective become a political tool?
They're registering the millions of illegal immigrants to flood the votes for Hillary.
Mark my words.
I was honestly thinking about moving to colorado a while ago. Not because of le weed or anything like that, but because I fucking love skiing, mountains, fresh air, and all that bullshit. But then I found out it's been overrun by LE WEED XDDD sjw stoner faggots.
Utah is a cool too, but I'm not sure I'll be able to get over the whole mormon thing if I were to live there permanently.
>>66034974
You can look it up but I doubt you'll care. Look up adolescent smoking of weed and IQ tests. The fact is it messes up the brain developmentally and even adults suffer from IQ loss as well.
>>66032650
This is a Primary campaign. We don't give a shit who you degenerate liberal faggots run against Trump in the General, they will lose to him. And if those voters are registering to vote for Bernie and he isn't the candidate many of them plan to switch parties before the General and vote Trump.
You=fail.
>>66035166
okay? i never contested that
>>66035292
You asked if I was implying that if you smoked you lose IQ points. Yes. I am.
>>66034974
Young people like me often partake in the use of weed for fun. We also tend to be ignorant on political issues. The reason I say it's used as a tool is because that single issue could bring someone who doesn't know any better into the voting booth and elect someone I might not have agreed with in the future.
It's kind of like the people who are so obsessed with their morality being correct they refuse to vote for someone who maybe thinks abortion isn't their decision.
>>66035636
>I might not have agreed with
excuse me, I meant *they* might not agree with
>>66032650
and yet only 120k came to vote on tuesday.
meanwhile in virginia, 400 percent increase in republican primary voter turnout
I just finished a beer in 10 minutes. At the current rate of consumption, I'll have drunk 8640 cans of beer at the end of two months.
>>66035592
that's not what i said at all, i asked if you were implying that I smoke and subsequently lost IQ points. Because I don't. Didn't ask or claim anything about the effect of weed on IQ. solid reading comprehension m8
I just looked it up, are you referencing the Meier study? Wasn't that refuted by that Rogeberg guy? I don't see how you can expect to adequately control for confounding factors with such a tiny sample size.
Regardless, doesn't make prohibition any less retarded
>>66035636
ah, makes sense.
>>66033161
BECOME COLORADO MAN
