Is killing family members of ISIS wrong?
>>65870336
No. We should crucify them all and keep the women as rape-toys. Nuke Raqqa and go Romanian on their kebab asses.
Yes. Killing innocents is nigger-tier
>"hurrr durrr ur a cuck!!!"
>>65871527
You assume they are innocent
>>65870336
If we do we will be just like them. Until there are no more of them. So yes its OK.
No.... If any of our family members ever commit a crime. Our entire family should get murdered.
It doesn't matter if we don't agree with the person who committed the crime we should all pay for it.
>>65871604
Not trying to defend anyone here but I have seen a video where a sandnigger shoots his own cousin to prove his allegiance to ISIS.
The cousin was definitely not happy with the events that unfolded.
He was screaming like a pig.
>>65870336
Right is what you can get away with. Take that as you want, it's reality.
sharia has the law of revenge.
when someone kills one of your family, you have to kill him and the act is considered honorable and is not punishable
so if you kill a member of ISIS, the rest of his family will take up arms to kill you. better get rid of the whole family to keep things from escalating into a sicilian vendetta
>>65872273
>sicilian vendetta
My sides.
kill em all
War has different rules than reality, you have to do what you have to do to ensure the safety of your own people. Trump has the right idea by putting Americans first.
Democrats and republicans on the other hand would consider American deaths acceptable if it saves a million worthless sandnigger lives. To them, all people of the world are equal and that is simply just not the case when you are leading a country and the entire world despises you for your power and strength. The uncivilized nations only want to live in peace and harmony with themselves. To them, everyone else is an enemy. Peace through violence is the only way they operate, no amount of feel-good intentions and multicultural acceptance is going to change that.
>>65870336
There is absolutely no way this would backfire and make US even more hated than it is today. Go with it.
>>65870336
>Is killing family members of murderous evil terrorists with an ideology bent on world domination wrong
We're just speaking to them in a language they would understand and perhaps one day they will stop their shit or think twice. Horrible things should happen to horrible people although we live in a world with horrible things can happen to nice people too so meh.
>wrong
We're way past right and wrong at this point, pal.
There's a war in the works and it's kill or be killed.
>>65870336
>Is killing family members of ISIS wrong?
Old special forces trick.
Worked in Columbia on Pablo Escobar and others.
>The US just needs to contract out the work ...
>wrong
Rights and wrongsbimply there is some kind of universal morality.
There isn't. That entire desert should be bombed until it's nothing but rivers of molten glass.
That is natural law at its finest.
Only if they're innocent.
>>65870336
>killing moderate Muslims
No
>>65873033
Can you elaborate?
>>65870336
if they are still in contact with the isis member it is ok
>>65870336
>Is killing family members of ISIS wrong?
ISIS is using their families as human shields so that they wont be bombed
are you suggesting we do what Isis wants, and not bomb them?
I think we all know the logical answer to this question.
>>65870336
Killing is always going to be morally wrong in some way, no matter how you slice it. But you can either live in an immoral world or die as a moral victim of somebody with greater will.
But, you cannot wage an imagined moral war and expect to ever win, especially against immoral, suicidal zealots. If you want to win a war, you must commit to it entirely. Our bullshit ROE is why we haven't won a war since WW2. To defeat an enemy like this, you have to kill them, their family, and destroy so much of their civilization that the ones that are left alive are completely dependent on their conquerors just to survive. These fuckers want to kill us. Assume their family wants to kill us too. The only way to win is to wipe them all out and burn everything they care about. There is no coexistence or compromise.
>>65870336
How will you kill all the American family members of the CIA operatives who run and finance ISIS?
>>65870336
Its not. Not killing them but killing the terrorists will just make more people hate us. The families will seek revenge and just create more and more terrorists. People think they can be safe just by killing a few of them. What will you do with the rest of them, let them go free with all their hate and teachings? Its retarded.
If it was just one terrorist who had his identity hidden from the rest of his family and friends, sure. But they all know each other in ISIS, its stupid to think that more won't come later for revenge.
Feels bad man, but it must be done.
>>65870336
idk is terrorism bad
If innocent, no
>>65870336
If they haven't done anything wrong themselves yes.
>>65870336
Morally, yes. Tactically, no.
We killed lot a civilians in World War II, what changed?
>>65870336
Isn't that why we invented collateral damage in the first place?
>>65872590
Leave no witnesses.
>>65870336
No. They raise awful children
