This is a thread for serious discussions about politics and economics.
I have recently discovered the YouTube channel PragerU, which lists a good number of videos explaining current political issues concisely. It's surprisingly neutral and not a liberal shitfest, so naturally /pol/ should be interested.
Especially now that Comrade Bernard Sandstein is failing for the Democrats and his rebbit followers are searching for a new purpose in life, it's time to embrace the truth.
>Does it Feel Good or Does it Do Good?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rOb_z-yYrU
>Do the Rich Pay Their Fair Share?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnEe4oaSC88
>What's the Right Minimum Wage?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j01L69eXdI
Does /pol/ know this channel? What do you think? Do they have a conservative bias or does the truth simply lean towards conservatism?
>>65823531
>"This is a thread for serious discussions about politics and economics."
why did you come on /pol/ fagit ?
pic related, it’s you
>>65823531
'they have some good "neutral videos"
there is some religious praise, jewish and christian
and there is some obvious bias towards conservatives
but judging by your views and this site, i think thats considered "neutral"
>>65823531
>It's surprisingly neutral
Prager is made for the purpose of being far right economics and "science"
>>65823627
>>65823781
>>65823789
>>65823531
>fair and neutral
This channel is Jew centric and leans hard on the right. If you watch this and honestly think it takes on its subject matter neutrally your honestly pretty moronic.
>>65823531
Great Channel.
Another Good one: Iran Nuclear Deal:
https://www.prageru.com/courses/political-science/iran-nuclear-deal
Plenty of other good ones too
>>65823895
Can you give an example video where they don't discuss the subject matter based on facts and reason?
Are there any left-biased channels that are as sensible and well-reasoned as this one? All you seem to ever see is "UMMM RACIST AND SEXIST MUCH??" emotive trendy bollocks.
>>65824040
I'm not saying they don't apply facts and reason, in fact it's presented pretty well. It's just that in every single video the conclusion is that the right is right. So to say it's neutral is just not true.
>>65824257
TYT is fucking B A S E D
>>65824279
>the right is right.
But it is always right
>The Promise of Free Enterprise
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSMd4BuuXB8
>>65824409
That's not the point. You were trying to say they were neutral, and they aren't when they only present the rights point of view.
I'm not saying it's wrong, but it's definitely not neutral. Objective and fact based sure, but only to present the conservative argument.
>>65824257
not if you arent looking, or willing
but if you are, there is some pretty good videos with testtubeplus
there are even better ones, but they would be considered neutral rather then leftist
and no one cares about neutral on here
>>65824765
>when they only present the rights point of view.
But they're pretty much ALWAYS presenting what the left's point of view is on the topic, as well. They just proceed to factually BTFO that point of view because it's not based on reason.
>>65823852
oki?
whats the response?
>>65824892
Do you not see yourself admitting that they are right leaning?
>>65823531
I agree that Prager U has some really great videos but Dennis Prager is a neocon kike. Fortunately Prager U doesn't have a foreign policy focus.
>>65824894
What do you mean?
>>65824892
they a representing the view some leftists have so they can BTFO them
but you should not confuse it with truth
you would probably be better off if you went outside your comfy zone more,
This is the same that happend to tumblr and reddit
they got too used to BTFO people that arent even represented
here is a true NEUTRAL video on political ideas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE3j_RHkqJc
im sure you will notice something if you watch it fully
PS: its an analogy, because its trying to be neutral, rather then chosing a view to support which (pagerU) does
>>65824329
Kill yourself
>>65825040
>Fortunately Prager U doesn't have a foreign policy focus.
Actually, I have to retract this statement, pic related.
>>65825032
I think they're honest in the way they come up with conclusions. If the conclusions lean towards the right, then that's fine. A conclusion is only biased when the discussions leading towards that conclusion are biased.
Otherwise you could every conclusion "biased" in some way, which defeats the point of calling it that.
>>65825106
what point are you trying to make with that image
>>65825040
I met Dennis Prager once at a thanksgiving dinner. Nice dude.
>>65825551
How do you meet such people? Is he part of your family somehow?
>>65825551
My first impression of him was him ranting and raving about how disastrous Ron Paul would be for Israel.
>>65825202
oyyyy veyyyyy
>>65824279
>they apply facts and reason
>facts and reason lead them to a vague direction in the political compass
>SEE THEY ARENT NEUTRAL BECAUSE OTHERWISE EVERY POLITICAL STREAM WOULD BE EQUALLY REPRESENTED
Maybe the 'vaguely left ideologies' are just not based on fact and reason and therefor neglectable and untrue?
>>65826008
We need more national socialist representation on Youtube political videos.
>>65823531
>It's surprisingly neutral
It probably sounds like that if you are neocon and deeply religious.
It's just another bunch of neocon lobbyists that try to present themselves as academic institution to gullible fools.
>>65825627
He was dating a family friend of mine, this was years ago.
>>65823531
If only there was a prager university minus the kikey propoganda.
