Couple splits up or argues. The dude leaks all their home made porn and nudes online in revenge. Then, the chick goes to the police.
Recently politicians have brought in tougher laws to crack down on guys who do this.
What does /pol/ think?
Is it cucked to take revenge? Are women fucked up to make porn in the first place? Should the law stay out of this?
Yet another way for women to act like whores with zero responsibility.
>>65609718
Nothing wrong with recording your fun times, bitter faggots leaking them after a relationship however are scum.
Everyone who does porn is a degenerate and deserves any fate that befalls them
We'll end revenge porn the minute women end revenge false accusations.
And not one second sooner.
>8ch has a board specifically for shaming named women with videos
>>65609844
They're scum for doing it but should be shamed, it should not be a crime.
>>65609718
If you send someone a video or photos of yourself, you are gifting them that data. It then becomes theirs.
>>65609860
and women will end revenge false accusations when men decide to man up and countersue them for perjury and defamation
As long as you don't share it for profit/commercial purpose, I think it should be allowed.
Don't want your nudes/videos leaked? don't make them
>>65609933
No it doesn't, the implication always is for private use only. Like buying a movie, you can't show your bluray to the public.
>>65609718
>Is it cucked to take revenge?
Guy is basically sharing his former girl with thousands obese wankers online. This is 110% cuckoldry
>>65609966
>men need to file petitions!
>courts throw them in the trash
Perjury doesn't mean a damn thing unless either the state or the elite is the one who wants an answer from the witness. US military routinely outs false rape accusers then lets them go without any consequences whatsoever.
Revenge porn is here to stay, just like feminazi judges.
>>65609932
The problem arises when men use it as a threat, the woman must do X or Porn online, and that is blackmail, and illegal
>>65609718
it has something to do with privacy and owning private information. so guys should not be allowed to share their exes nudes on the internet. it is like leaking the Donald Sterling conversation. it happened in private and should have stayed private. I would say he got fucked but no he got 2 billion dollars in the end.
>>65609718
If they married, they would have no use for such things.
If they truly loved eachother, and had good family values, they wouldn't ever get to the point that they'd do such a thing and destroy their family.
If people had good family values, they wouldn't marry people who would do these things.
It all comes down to men in western society being sissyfucks who glorify vagina and losing virginity, and the women in western society being trashy whores.
Your culture's gone in the shitter lately. I really do feel for you.
>>65609718
I consider it a dick move to do something like that but it shouldn't be a law enforced by the government. People ought to learn about being responsible in the decisions that they make and not rely on the government to save you if you make a bad choice that you knew could come back to bite you in the ass later.
>>65610209
There is always the option of not recording fucking porn in the first place.
>Fuck douches who film it and then put it online
You should A) Not be sleeping with a douche, B) Not sleeping with someone who films it
It's like getting into a car when the driver is clearly drunk and then getting mad at him when he crashes.
You knew what you were getting into, maybe if you didn't sleep around so much it wouldn't happen.
>>65609933
That's not how copyright laws work
>>65610329
>if the world were perfect, we wouldn't have problems
An astute observation.
>>65610209
>that is blackmail, and illegal
Right, blackmail is illegal and they should be charged for blackmailing an ex
simply posting revenge porn while a shitty thing to do is not a crime, just as me going on a street corner and yelling that my ex jessica is a whore is not a crime
>>65610446
In a perfect world you would already know his astute observation.
>>65610435
>copyright laws
This isn't copyrighted content
>>65610386
Yeah but if you get into a car with a driver who is clearly drunk and he kills you, he still faces charges for killing you.
So not the best example on your part
>>65610573
The simple act of creation creates content via copyright law.
>>65610456
This is not blackmail. The men aren't trying to get anything from the women. There is no threat.
>>65610435
>Claiming copyright
This is why revenge porn is effectively invincible in practice: if you want to claim copyright then you have to prove you own it. This does the following things:
1: invoke the Streisand effect (video becomes famous)
2: connect accuser's name and face to the video (the star becomes famous too)
Go ahead, make it a copyright issue. /t/ already routinely hosts porn videos that the stars tried to destroy.
>>65610456
Yeah this is what these new laws are about, a woman can complain and there will be a takedown notice served, limiting distribution etc while other avenues of law take place
>>65609718
>someone doesn't like a thing
>cries about it
>makes it a crime
>people go to jail and have their lives ruined
All because dumb sluts are incapable of simply NOT not sending nude pictures of themselves on the phone
>>65610573
Any image of yourself is
That's why Facebook has such a long terms and agreements, because you're consenting that any image of yourself posted on it now belongs to the public.
You don't sign that agreement when you make a sex tape. You do in porn, but not in private.
>>65609718
"I didn't upload those pics, she did it herself. She's an exhibitionist you see."
>>65610648
>takedown notice
Damn dude, how am I ever going to find pirated games on butt torrent or anime episodes on jewtube? The internet is plagued with too many takedown notices.
One should own your body. If a person distributes a naked picture of you w/o your consent then said person should be punished. That being said people need to be smart and stop taking naked pictures of themselves, unless you are being compensated for them.
Why is it such a problem? Admit you were a whore and move on with your life.
>>65610329
Like your kind is to talk.
>>65610798
>people should
That's a fine thought, but in practice it doesn't mean anything. People are just whining because they've been exposed to life as we know it, and they expect mommy government to rescue them because that's what they're used to.
My gf and I have discussed this, she's sent me nudes of herself a few times when she was overseas for work.
She never had her face in the shots, so there's no tarnish to the relationship if I ever decided to send them to someone.
Anyone who posts nudes of themselves to someone with their face in it is fucking retarded and deserves all the backlash from such a stupid thing.
>>65609718
It's another problem of shitty people being shitty to each other.
I have made dozens of foot and lactation videos for my husband and never have to worry about them being leaked even if we broke up.
I would never upload his videos either.
>gf broke up with me
>brazilian laws can make me pay more than 2k dollars plus 6 months in prison if I leak it
>make a perfect fake account on kikebook
>add her
>tell her "I" got her nudes from her ex bf by using phone while he wasnt looking
>send her nudes to her as proof
>she falls for it
>threat her to leak her nudes if she doesnt make more nudes for me
>she can't do shit, do all the shit I want including pics with anal which she always denied to the real me
>after i get bored of doing so and get enough proof its her I leak it with proof it's her plus her name on watermark in all pics
>send it to 100% of her friends plus everyone who liked her school facebook page which adds up to 800 people
>instantly delete my fake facebook account
>she probably realized it was me but she can't do shit since she never sent these pictures to me
>she was only 15 at the time
Thats what you get for breaking up with me so you can have sex with 2 niggers(not a joke she started going out with them within a week of breaking out with me) you whore.
Plus, she got depressed after all that and got fat.
>>65610977
You own your own body, if you don't agree with your body to be made public then nobody has the right to make it so. The person that posts your naked pics online w/o your consent is intruding on your liberties and should be punished.
>>65610329
Yes, it's a difficult concept for a pea brain to understand, but that's what life in western civilisation is like. We are complicated free thinking creatures, not robots programmed by some silly book.
>>65611041
Sending this to Brazillian Interpol.
Hopefully they link you up with the story and arrest you, faggot.
>>65610446
The world was hardly perfect half a century ago.
What's happened in the time between then and now? American domination of western media and politics. The erosion of family values moved from the US, to Europe, and festered in both with renewed vigour.
>>65610850
My kind? A virgin saving himself for marriage, in the employ of the army?
Have I done something wrong?
>>65611041
looks like a thing a girl would do
>>65611172
But wouldn't the male in the relationship also own the right to have his body be made public? He's posting a picture of him getting his dick sucked. Nothing more, nothing less.
>>65611256
>We are complicated free thinking creatures,
That's exactly what I expect a slut to say.
You can be free thinking all you like, you're still a slut in my eyes, male or female, and worth less than the dirt under my boots.
>>65611041
Most rational guys would just shrug it off and start dating another woman.
You went full sociopath on her. Must have really hit you hard when she broke up with you.
She also sounds like a smart little cookie, I bet your intelligence matches up with hers.
>>65611281
We are anoonuse
we do not forget
we do not give
>>65611281
Goodluck, there is nothing that links it to me. Plus I can be making shit up. It was a coincidente that that's what exactly happened to my ex gf but I'm not the fake account guy.
;^)
>>65609718
>Is it cucked to take revenge?
A little. Unnecessary energy for someone you don't want to have anything to do with anymore.
>Are women fucked up to make porn in the first place?
If they are doing it with their partner or for him, it's not only them doing it.
>Should the law stay out of this?
Of course it should. You can't replace common sense with laws.
>>65609718
They can win a civil suit no doubt, but going so far as to make it criminal sounds bonkers to me.
The people who do do that though are scumbags imo
>>65610435
It's the implication, you are gifting them ownership of the picture, that includes copyright.
>>65611442
He can post all the pictures he wants of his dick but if he posts another person in it w/o their consent then he is intruding on said person's liberties. It's pretty simple and you are simply being obtuse on purpose.
>>65609718
How about 'don't let guys film you sucking his dick'?
>>65611531
>Is it cucked to take revenge?
>A little. Unnecessary energy for someone you don't want to have anything to do with anymore.
Why are Germans so cucked. Hanz stop letting your women run wild without consequence.
>>65611028
What actually happened to the guy in the webm?
>>65611623
I'm being esoteric, actually. He has a right to post his dick getting sucked. If she didn't want the picture taken she could have said something.
>>65611737
Since the counterweight was broken and had no brakes, the elevator kept rising. It then hit the top of the building, broke, then fell down the elevator shaft.
The guy either died from crashing into the ceiling of the building or the fall.
Either way, he's dead.
>>65611451
Yes your reaction is understandable, independent thought would be an offensive concept for those of closed mind
If you record it or take the picture yourself then you can claim copyright in the US. Sue the guy for illegally distributing your art. This is how JLaw got the Fappening shut down.
Any other law is excessive and designed to curtail accountability for one's own actions.
>>65611041
props from canada anon
>>65609718
Can't find any pics
>>65609825
First Post, best post.
You can bet your ass that when the uploader is a woman she can go away with a pat on the head.
Our system and laws are paternalistic to the core, sluts are taking advantage of that everyday, don't giving a fuck about muh soggy knees.
whoa a picture of a person holding a sign this will surely achieve great things
>>65609718
I'm a firm believer in the idea that If you don't want the chance of it being leaked or used against you in the future, don't do it.
This is why we still don't have nudes of Emma Watson (although it is unfortunate). She's a smart cookie.
>>65611871
He didnt die, he had some head injuries but that was it
>>65611693
Wasting time and effort on someone you separated from only means you let them impose in on you. It gives them the upper hand because it is the ultimate acknowledgement that you're still invested in them.
Don't talk to them, don't aggravate them and just keep your distance.
>>65611461
Femanon detected, stay mad
nice done brazil bro, you destroyed her kek
>>65610102
>No it doesn't, the implication always is for private use only. Like buying a movie, you can't show your bluray to the public.
For that to be true you would have include a copyright on the digital copy of the video. Without one the video is public domain, but attributable.
>>65611871
Don't elevators have emergency brakes that activate beyond X g?
>>65611871
Nah He just had Head and Leg injuries, found an article about it
>>65611461
Yeah it did hit me hard but it's all fine now, when I see some pic of her all that I get is disgust from how horribly fat she is nowadays. But I don't stalk her or anything like that. And she was dumb af but what can you expect she is a woman after all.
>>65612480
thanks senpai
ID changed since I'm no longer on my cellphone
>>65611617
That's also not how copyright works.
>>65610573
>This isn't copyrighted content
Yes it is, retard. Taking a picture automatically creates a copyright.
When a girl takes a selfie, she owns the copyright. When a guy takes a picture of a girl, he owns the copyright. Scarlett Johansson pursued copyright infringement against people posting her nudes because she'd taken the pictures and thus owned the rights to the image.
These laws are a disaster. It's the same thing as when Larry Flynt went to the Supreme Court after a lower court found him innocent of libel but still responsible for damages because what he said was really bad. The question is: can we punish someone for sharing an image that they own completely just because it's super embarrassing?
>>65610617
>The simple act of creation creates content via copyright law.
The hiccup in your statement is that the PHOTOGRAPHER is the copyright holder not the subject.
>Under the provisions of the revised copyright law, a photographer owns all rights to his pictures at the moment of creation. That means he and he alone owns the right to sell, use, distribute, copy, publish, alter or destroy his work of art. If you are a photographer, this ownership begins the moment you click the shutter.
>>65609718
Revenge is always the province of the weak. It's an avoidant, passive-aggressive beta response, instead of confronting the cunt head on like a man.
Best way to do is the old fashioned way.
Pull out your phone when you're drunk at a bar with mates.
>>65610108
Since he doesn't have her at his disposal anymore, it's not cuckoldry. Heck, you might even argue that pr0n-watching is inherent cuckoldry and the dude releasing it is being the bull of all the wankers.
I would need a link to forge my own opinion.
