We show this, but not nudity?
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: We show this, but not nudity?
wtf is wrong with America. They watch this shit and still cant show a few nipples on screen. Why?
>>65604372
Because it's a man, and not a woman.
Pretty sure I've seen nipples on plenty of American tv shows.
>>65604372
Historical accuracy out the window that's what you murricans like.
I think nudity is allowed on tv but they don't show it because muh rating
>>65604372
why you burgers watch shit like vikings?
go read stuff about "vikings" if you find them interesting instead of watching that ridicules shit.
>watching Vikings
Garbage ass show for hipsters nu-males thinking they're the hot shit for rocking an undercut and a beard.
Jesus that must have been put in that show just to give any potential women watching a giant egotistical lady boner.
>>65604372
Because that is fake and nudity is real
Women really get off on shit like this. Reverse the genders and it would never fly.
>>65604372
isn't this a Canadian or Irish show?
what's that? Zelda killings Link's uncle?
They cuck the best warrior in the land with a stong wymn
>Comparing false violence with real nudity
And using a cable show was a stupid because cable isn't bound by FCC laws, they self regulate.
>>65605668
least he's not Aethelwulf. cucked by a monk and his father
>>65604372
As long as they cuck a white man, it's all good.
>>65604372
They dont actually show anything in that clip op. whats the problem?
muh strong wymyn
>>65604372
>Watching Vikings
I bet you think game of cocks and spartacuck were good shows
So funny how no one ever shows the reality of the situation when strong soldier/warrior gurls are involved.
Even if they are somehow killed, it'll always be incredibly clean and quick.
They'll never have Stacy looking like this, or getting run over by a tank, or crawling her severed upper body along the ground as her guts and ovaries slide out of the gaping hole where her waist used to be.
Almost like they know showing the reality of women in combat will make people realise why it's such a bad idea.
>>65604614
Yet man-ass is shown all the time even in PG-13 shows that censor swear words.
I legitimately love Vikings.
>>65604372
Supporter of Matriarchy here
Fucking saved
>>65604693
I don't want to here about danes and sweedes fighting to put their cocks in each others mouth. If you're going to show history you got to jazz it up a bit.
>>65604372
We have always been violent and sexually puritanical. This is nothing new.
>>65609996
Europeans (and people of that descent) are naturally more violent. We hide it, tried to scrub it out of our genes, but soon we're gonna need some blood. That's why I can't wait for a race war.
>>65610608
>naturally more violent.
not according to every statistic ever recorded by anyone
>>65604372
Why does he look like a cowboy if he's a viking?
Why is emasculation in every show but alluding to female rape leads to backlash?
>>65610847
We've been suppressed, don't you know? We wuz violent men and sheeeit.
>>65611097
Because sexism only applies if it's against women apparently.
>>65604372
Patience little goy, in a few years you will have legal CP in your smart tv. Vote for liberals, help Israel and blame christianity
