/POL/
B T F O
>>61045166
>politifact
>literally a website extension of the Hillary campaign
go away shill
Literally what.
PANTS ON FIRE PANTS ON FIRES
>>61045166
>politifact
SAY IT WITH ME:
MADAM PRESIDENT
>>61045166
Trumb absolutely and undoubtedly BTFO and on suicide watch... for a reason
>>61045502
Trump got BTFO too don't worry
>>61045166
Get BTFO libcuck
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/11/report-fbi-investigation-of-hillary-clinton-expands/
>>61045631
lol
>>61045826
>>61045631
They don't look that strong and powerful to me, I could probably beat them in a fight
t. Politifact
>>61045898
>>61045498
It's been said so many times before, but
>DUDE
>WEED
>LMAO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLk2aSBrR6U
>>61045166
>>61045166
For republicans on politifact, half true usually means true.
>>61045166
Citing Lolifact as a source
Not even once.
>>61045631
>False
What a shit fact checker. There are numerous reports going around about how the vast majority of refugees flooding into Europe are male. You can't just say it's false and then jerk yourself off as proof.
>>61045898
the middle one is a bad example.
>>61045166
There was that one tin-hat American posting 3 times a day about all of the 'evidence' the FBI had and how she was toast.
When asked for the evidence, it was never presented.
People need to stop trying to invent false dirt on Hillary over stupid shit, and actually start campaigning against her.
Or at least start donating to republican campaigns for the house/senate so that her bullshit can be blocked.
>>61046027
I find their fact checking more interesting than the rulling. In this case, Hillary clinton's private email server is clearly under investigation according to politifact. But that rates only half true?
>>61045166
Jesus Christ politifact are the biggest fucking shills
>>61046053
so many things wrong with that pic. What usually happens is republicans are too unspecific which they do on purpose as a tool of misleading. Democrats may be wrong, but when they're wrong its only on a point or 2 within the whole of their argument, so they end up with something like "half true".
Trump is the biggest one when it comes to simplifying shit.
>>61045166
>Politifact
>>61046425
I wonder if they got a horse in the race..
>>61046336
>"We were broke when we left the white house" - Shillary Clinton
Is that "half-true" as well?
Fuck off libcuck. Democrats are no better than Republicans. They never says specific shit and when they do they're utter retards.
Look at any democrat trying to talk about guns, they have no idea what they're talking about
But I'm sure you'll say they're still "half-true"
FUCK OFF BACK TO LEDDIT
>>61045166
>politi''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''fact''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>>61045166
I tried to warn them
They looked away
>>61046053
>Lolifact
What? Why are you dragging lolis into this?
>>61046336
>republicans are unspecific on purpose as a tool of misleading
>democrats who mix lies in with their arguments aren't being misleading
