Why couldn't niggers in africa domesticate their wildlife ?
The europeans tamed the fucking aurochs
>>57363349
Because the white man was oppressing them
not enough money for dem programs
Muh we respected the great bufallo
>>57363349
Differences in brain structure, and most notably differences in intelligence, time preference, and creativity.
>>57363349
too busy bathing in their piss
dont make me post it
No reason to.
>>57363349
>>57363398
>>57363455
With the help of the horse, mind you
>>57363499
Hell, even we gave up trying to tame the buffalo and almost slaughtered them into extinction in our frustration
>>57363719
.. Horse that they also domesticated
>>57363719
Cattle were probably domesticated before horses.
>>57363811
Kind of, sheep were domesticated before the Aryan warlords brought horses down from Russia, but they domesticated horses first, not cattle.
Early Europeans had a thing called animal husbandry. Which allowed them a great advantage with livestock. Unlike their African counterpart.
Same reasons native Americans didn't. They had no reason to. Invention is born of necessity.
>>57363349
Because its impossible to dominate your equals
dey had spaceships till the white man stole them all
Because the advantageous climate and environmental conditions in africa did not necessitate much effort to survive.
"They" (niggers) can basically just go to a tree and pick a nice juicy fruit.
Or take a stick and poke one of the many animals running around.
Cold climate and harsh conditions in Europe forced "us" (europeans) to be inventive, to think and be smart about our resources.
This is where evolution kicks in.
In Europe, smart people survive and procreate. Those that are not smart enough die, their kids die, they slowly but surely die out.
In Africa, basically everyone can easily survive. Being more intelligent provides no advantage for survival. Intelligent people don't die out, but they don't reproduce in larger numbers than less intelligent people, and also don't primarily procreate among themselves.
tl;dr: FUCK NIGGERS
>>57363349
>Cattle
>Guineafowl
>Lions
>>57365259
Eueope had lions also, they all got killed.
>>57365311
Couldn't tame them you killed them
>>57365115
>poo in the loo
>worship cattle
>>57365259
Lions were found all over south eastern europe, throughout the middle east and into India.
There are still colonies of lions in India today.
>>57365571
fkn racist lions colonizing India like that!
>>57363719
>What are zebras
>>57365425
Same as bears and wolves on most of mainland europe except for Carpathia and Russia. If it doesn't serve, it dies. Whites FUCK YEAR.
>>57365311
The Africans were smart enough to tame them. Just ask Tewodros II
>>57365241
too be fair the relatively fertile conditions of Mesopotamia, the Nile River Valley, the Indus River Valley, and created the first advanced civilizations,
Still they relied on agriculture to survive, they couldn't just go to the nearest tree and pick fruit as was the case in Africa.
>>57365724
Made me qek, thank you Sweden
>>57365977
ill be here all week
>>57365964
>Mesopotamia, the Nile River Valley, the Indus River Valley
>black civilizations
no
why did Europeans need to use bows and guns to hunt their foxes
why couldn't they chase them down on foot for three days until the animal literally died of exhaustion like the Africans
>being such a hunterkek that you need unnatural implements like traps or weaponry to capture food
>relying on some other man to grow food out of the dirty ground for you
>having to be home at the end of the day or else you get nagged by your bitch of a wife and six mewling sprogs
>not realizing that five of them are the fucking farmer's because he's out banging your whore wife while you're shitting yourself at the thought of being caught by the King's guard as you fox hunt on his land
>>57363349
because africans are Rs and we are Ks:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory
what would they even domesticate?
Was there even something like goats/pigs/cows in sub saharan africa?
>>57366519
pygmies?
>>57366265
I didn't mean to imply they were black just that they had somewhat easier living conditions due to being situated on near rivers and having mild weather.
Europe and Central asia on the other hand, the places where whites supposedly originated, get cold as fuck and farming was much more difficult which is why the population was so low until relatively recently.
>>57366441
You dip, humans are r while life expectancies are low, and K when they're high. Every country that's currently K used to be r, and as countries develop, they become more K.
>>57365115
This is the second time I've seen an Indian post savage bantz today
The hell is going on over there
>>57366681
go fuck yourself, statist.
Im'a gonna defoo you for that.
>>57366822
>not realizing cows are sacred in India
>>57365115
>Cows
>Equals
Of course an Indian made this post
>>57363349
There is no domesticatable wildlife in sub saharan africa idiot
>>57367068
of course not
Aren't you being a little bit too kind?
>>57363349
funfact there were lions in south of france longtime ago and peoples wipe them off
get your shit together africa you are supposed to be hunters not food
>>57366681
wrong, faggot.
>>57367068
Of course there are domesticatable wildlife in Africa. How else do you think the British were able to maintain large cotton plantations
>>57365964
But when you get to the point where agriculture in large scale is possible you reach critical mass, more food = more people in a densly populate area, so you end up with cities, systems of governance, art, and so on.
>>57363349
>ctrl f tsetse fly
>no results
>>57363539
Subtle, very good.
>>57363349
Niggers have low IQ
>Black university students in South Africa also show relatively low mean test scores. Sixty-three undergraduates at the all-Black universities of Fort Hare, Zululand, the North, and the Medical University of South Africa had a full-scale IQ of 77 on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised (Avenant, 1988, cited in Nell, 2000, pp. 26 –28). In a study at the University of Venda in South Africa’s Northern Province by Grieve and Viljoen (2000), 30 students in 4th-year law and commerce averaged a score of 37 out of 60 on the Standard Progressive Matrices, equivalent to an IQ of 78 on U.S. norms
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/pppl1.pdf
>>57367472
>As of 2010 it caused around 9,000 deaths per year
>On a continent of almost 1 billion people
Wow it's fucking nothing. The black death killed that many people in Europe in a day.
>>57367704
What I was going for was that it's bite killed cattle and other beast of burden. It made cattle and other livestock incredibly hard and unrewarding to domesticate.
>>57364186
underrated post
>>57367403
Ok I'll admit that was pretty good Apu
>>57363349
>cause Africa
>>57363674
This.
The changing of the seasons; That is to say, Winters that last 3 to 5 months, where it fucking snows, is what caused humans to develop things like farming and harvesting and stockpiling and taming of animals and drinking their milk and breeding them and fucking written language.
In those parts of Africa, there are things to kill all year round.
>>57363349
It's because you can't eat those animals.
>>57367068
This is a retarded excuse.
Do you think the animals in Europe started out as they are now? No, Europeans worked to create the modern cow and the modern pig.
Africans have equivalents, they have buffalo, they have boars, they have zebras, they have camels, hell even dogs can be used to carry carts just like sled dogs.
>>57363349
A combination of several things
1. Lower intelligence.
2. No need for progress/too harsh climate for progress. Almost no competition and/or harsh climate. Harder to keep and breed animals in harsh climate.
3. Arguably animals that were harder to tame - the Zebra was tried domesticated several times, but it failed because they were too wild. The wild horse we had were easier to tame.
>>57368490
Dogs pull carts?
They don't even have carts to pull. They were dindus from the bronze age
>>57368582
>the Zebra was tried domesticated several times, but it failed because they were too wild
They mustn't have tried very hard if they spent all those years living with them and then the white man comes and tames them fine
>>57367129
>>57368582
The African climate is hardly harsh. Certainly not compared to Europe. European winters are vicious. Even more so tens of thousands of years ago. Even more so in northern Asia. The worst things niggers had to deal with is heat, which the human body is perfectly adapted to deal with.
>>57368671
Well why not?
>>57368710
A bit easier to tame animals with the technology and knowledge we had though.
>>57368793
The thing is, the weather many places in Africa can be very unpredictable. If the climate is mild, and people survive fairly well and there is little competition, there is no need for progress.
How do you think us snowniggers in Scandinavia would have been doing without contact with Eurasia?
There are so many factors playing in, their intelligence vs ours is just a small part of it.
>>57363349
This is one of my favorites.
Africans: shitty, nearly unusable fruit for all of known history of Man in Africa.
White man discovers the watermelon. Less than 400 years later has transformed it into a staple food item of extreme value.
check yo raCISt priviledge
As for the domestic-ability of zebras, African elephants, and so forth, take a look at any old style circus(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6fjjLvjkoc). Diamond is just making up any stupid excuse he can find for the underperformance of the inferior races, without worrying much about making sense.
>>57367403
They literally imported Indians for that.
>>57363349
Sardinians did, not "europeans"
>>57363349
Because white people have been holding them down forever.
Get with the program anon.
>>57367513
Let me be a dick here: I cannot help but noticxe that there are large parts of Africa without the fly.
Did the native poputaions there domesticate cattle? After all, Africa is a large place and so you'd expect there to be cattle ranchers. I also seem to remember Ghandi talking about Africans owning cattle in his book about why niggers suck.
African was in a state of constant unending tribal war so they very had the chance to innovate.
All this talk of 'no reason to' is bullshit. Other jungle cultures like southern India, Vietnam, even bloodly Polynesians had more advanced societies.
>>57363729
lolwut
so now we're literally making things up?
>>57370388
>jungle cultures like southern India
South India isn't really a jungle culture, and they weren't isolated from the rest of the country or the rest of Eurasia either. Vietnamese are basically genetically Chinese.
A better example would be the Indigenous South Americans, they had calendars, written language, multiple story buildings, etc, which no Sub-Saharan Africans did till the Arabs showed up.
>>57363349
We love and respect our nature and the animals. Thats why we have elefants and lions on our money.
>>57364186
Native americans domesticated the lamaa for whool production. Not much but at least they tried. Africans never domesticated shit.
>>57367403
What the fuck is in the Indian cheerios this morning?
>>57371399
there are people from moçambique coming here? I-I never thought
>>57365115
the loo bantz is callusing indian posters, making them stronger
>>57371399
Why do you allow the ivory trade and trophy hunting then?
>>57365905
I always wondered whether you could domesticate zebras like you could with horses, or was it something that never did catch because Kunta Kinte didn't figure out how to farm?
White privilege.
>>57363349
Niggers in africa have domesticated their cattle you ceuckfuck
>>57371399
This is romantic bullshit. Nigger pls.
![Aurochs_heck_comparison[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/O16Aa2M.jpg "Aurochs heck comparison[1]")
