1) A man got mad at a Christmas party, and came back to the place of the party wearing body armor with his wife. They proceeded to kill 14 people. Nobody at the scene described a female shooter.
2) there was no deeper meaning to the shooter having weapons of terror that he unleashed at the drop of a hat
3) there was no preceding dispute involving the shooter and his company until today
4) he met his wife over the internet and flew over to meet her, but his brother-in-law lived in the same city as him.
5) that the shooter could slip out of the scene of a shooting undetected, yet went down after a short gunfight
There's so many holes in this story that it should be a block of cheese.
>>57361681
>Bernadino
>>57361681
>>57361681
Shouldn't you faggots be used to being lied to by now? And when exactly are you planning on using these weapons you are so desperate to hold onto to start to fight back against a government that enables this shit?
> Oh, thats right, you won't cuz you're all too busy eating burgers and going to church.
GG americunts.
>>57361801
when u a mongoloid but u post anyways
#justaussiethings
6) the event was a company party, yet there have been no interviews of people that attended the party.
>>57361681
>A man got mad at a Christmas party, and came back
That's been debunked already.
>>57361845
> when you can't form an argument but need to have the last word anyway
#justmillenialthings
>>57361801
That's not how you greentext, dumbass.
>>57361801
Nice provocation. another shitpost with no substance from Austrailia. I guess you win the shitpost contest again. Every day you've won, even against India in a street shitoff, even winning against India in a polandball shitoff. You guys are really something else MATE
>>57361895
A lot of them are dead, and those who survived are certainly with the police. Police get witnesses before the press does. Come on now it's the current year get with the program.
>>57361898
Thats how its being reported in ausfalia, but I don't buy it. Even if he was buttmad beyond belief, why would the other two get onboard?
>>57361942
see
>>57361898
Thanks for playing though, you were great.
>>57361681
That isn't the official story, thats libfag damage control. Every leftist cunt piece of shit in the world spent the entire day prematurely shooting their wad trying to hype up the shooters as two crazed white guys.
Their entire fucking world was shattered to find out that, surprisingly, it was muslims yet again. They're trying to skirt around their enormous fuckups by making excuses to avoid having to admit how laughably wrong and biased they are.
These arab muslims didn't just show up with rifles and shoot some coworkers. They showed up, shot people in numerous locations, got in a high speed chase, had a shootout with the cops, they also had a pipebomb, and another IED of some design.
That cannot be called workplace violence. That is an Islamic terrorist attack. Thats the story. Those are the facts. Everything else is spin.
>>57361681
Can anyone sum up for me what happened? Are they muzzies? Local news doesn't mention it
>>57362018
fuck, meant to link to >>57361903.
>>57361681
>If you believe the official story of San Bernadino then you believe that Anonymous
Is this another 'it was a false flag' thread?
1)Nobody at the scene described a female shooter.(absence of evidence, yada)
2) there was no deeper meaning to the shooter having weapons of terror that he unleashed at the drop of a hat(wha?)
3) there was no preceding dispute involving the shooter and his company until today(how do you know, sauce)
4) he met his wife over the internet and flew over to meet her, but his brother-in-law lived in the same city as him.(da fug?)
5) that the shooter could slip out of the scene of a shooting undetected, yet went down after a short gunfight(they detected the big black vehicle, found it, chased it, gunfight, one fled, all types of bombs and shit)
FUCKING TARDS HERE SHOULD NOT FEED
>>57362035
The most accurate thing I've seen so far, I know people that had to work on the scene, anyone else from san bernardino area?
>>57362077
fucked up again m8, here's the proper link >>>/mlp/
>>57362035
>Their entire fucking world was shattered to find out that, surprisingly, it was muslims yet again. They're trying to skirt around their enormous fuckups by making excuses to avoid having to admit how laughably wrong and biased they are.
This
it's so fucking DELICIOUS
Pity so many of them didn't get properly pilled since they didn't release all the news until late at night
>>57362035
>Every leftist cunt piece of shit in the world spent the entire day prematurely shooting their wad trying to hype up the shooters as two crazed white guys.
Meanwhile /pol/ listened to the police scanners and knew wtf was going on the whole time.
That being said, none of this makes any sense whatsoever. My opinion? They snapped and went Mickey and Mallory. I could be wrong. In all likelihood they were radicalized. There was a report ISIS claimed responsibility, but wtf knows with those guys.
>>57362035
And it's really only a husband and wife team? went pretty quickly from 3 shooters to a husband and wife.
This smells like an operation designed to justify Obama trying to co-opt Trump and his stances while also enacting more controls. If Obama goes hard at Muslims and Islamic terror, that undermines Trump since Republicans will oppose things Obama supports. Obama doesn't want Trump to be President because Trump is the only candidate not bought and paid for.
It's more likely a special ops situation. Similar to Christopher Dorner, Sandy Hook, and 9/11.
>>57362076
They're American Muslim. The only thing that MSM left out was that the shooters were screaming Allahu akbar when they were shooting.
Also one guy said, remember: No English
>>57362641
Thanks
>>57362577
The cops yoked up a third guy who they then released as having no part in it.
>>57362536
I didn't see ISIS twitter claim responsibility, but they were congratulating the shooters. Apparently some of the translations worked out to calling them the three lions or something similar.
These type of attacks are formulated within the mosque. It happens with earshot of everyone while they're conversing after prayer, sometimes its even the subject of the service itself. You'll have the bearded grand poobah stand up in front of everyone, do his little finger sign shenanigans, and talk about how westerners should meet the sword. None of the so called moderate muslims in the mosque are ratting out their fellow peace lovers to the police because even the moderates aren't friends of our civilization. They're all enemies, some are just too lazy to fight.
>>57362732
hopefully that "unrelated" person didn't miss his flight out of the country at LAX. There's a lot of "unrelated" people that just magically leave the US after these attacks.
Think about it.. if this was gonna be another justification for gun controls and it's a white guy, then it's not unique. But if it's a Muslim, then they have a wedge to introduce gun controls. Obama gets controls intended only for "terrorists" (like how some thought the Patriot Act only fought terrorists) and Rs get the Trump problem taken off their hands after they get some concessions.
Watch the wife be a refugee from like Pakistan or something, then, Obama gets gun controls in exchange for concessions on refugees.
>>57361681
Is this legit?
Is this the OFFICIAL story?
>>57361792
Im not a conspiratard, but this is the first time where I believe the msm (at least cnn) is straight up lying/not even trying to make the truth match the narrative
fox news' seems to have had accurate although measured reporting on it
msnbc is more concerned about people getting back to their homes near the crime scenes than the actual shootings
>>57361801
this was meant for you
>>57363117
>>57361734
Feeling the
>Bern
Yet?
>>57361681
And there's a guy with a Freemason hat who just happens to be around. The Freemasons are known as the "builders" of the New World Order, the builders of the world that they want. They could have orchestrated this whole thing.
It doesn't even make sense that his wife and brother in law would just say "those mean office people made you sad? lawl, we just happen to have this body armor and weapons laying around, let's go kill them." Women don't even commonly fight in Islamic societies.
>>57361681
A moslem, at a Christmas party? Surely you jest. Why the fuck would they allow a moslem at a Christmas party? A Christian celebration. I though they were like jews and on the banned list.
Oh wait, they did kick him out didn't they. His wife must of gotten him through the door and then he was noticed once in. Now it makes sense.
>>57363012
Except that the entire republican base would crucify any 'pub who voted for a such a thing and you'd need a LOT of pub's to get such a thing through either house.
In addition to that, I just don't see a Many Americans becoming more willing to give up their guns because because some imported raghead misused one, if anything I see repubicans using this as leverage to force Obama to play chicken on the issue, they pass legislation restricting immigration from muslim nations and putting special controls on Immigrants from places like syria, and dare him to veto it.
When he inevitably does the next(also inevitable) Islamic terroist action in the US destroys his credibility completely.
If it's not gun it will be a car bomb or a macguyvered Incindiary device or a gas attack or whatever else. You cannot via law, prevent people from harming each other, it is not possible, and disarming the population only makes it easier for the violent to act.
>>57361681
>1) A man got mad at a Christmas party, and came back to the place of the party wearing body armor with his wife.
Earlier they would not confirm the person that was asked to leave the party was also the one that shot it up.
>They proceeded to kill 14 people. Nobody at the scene described a female shooter.
The official story is they were both wearing ski masks "tactical gear", which presumably could hide T&A.
>2) there was no deeper meaning to the shooter having weapons of terror that he unleashed at the drop of a hat
"No deeper meaning" is not part of the official story, they've said they're not ready to announce a motive.
>3) there was no preceding dispute involving the shooter and his company until today
He didn't work for a company, he worked for the county. "There was no earlier dispute" is not part of the official story, there may or may not have been. There is no official motive yet.
>4) he met his wife over the internet and flew over to meet her, but his brother-in-law lived in the same city as him.
Haven't heard this. Is there some reason her brother couldn't have moved to the same town his sister was staying at? Is there some actual wrinkle in where these people were?
>5) that the shooter could slip out of the scene of a shooting undetected, yet went down after a short gunfight
Don't know whether there was police or security at the building, or if so where they were, so it's not exactly a master ninja skill to "slip out undetected".
>tfw liberal radio people are serious trying to push that this was "workplace violence"
seriously?
They found explosives at their house and a pipe bomb in the car, not typically something a normal person would have
>>57363818
They called Nidal Hasan shooting up Ft. Hood work place violence as well.
A muslim guy getting fired for trying to forcefully convert his coworkers to Islam then coming back and beheading someone was called work place violence.
The ISIS attack in Texas is totally ignored by the media.
The ISIS attack on a recruiting center in Tennessee is ignored by the media as well.
When a muslim is the perpetrator of the crime the media will either bury it, or they will run with the workplace violence angle. They're doing everything possible to try and give muslims a good public image. The question is why?
Why was the Obama admin so dedicated to speaking well of Islam? Why did all these cuk leaders in the western world immediately follow suit? They're clearly trying to push a narrative that is falling apart at the seams.
>>57363649
>Except that the entire republican base would crucify any 'pub who voted for a such a thing and you'd need a LOT of pub's to get such a thing through either house
They'll lie and tell people that only terrorist muslims have anything to be worried about. Then they'll quietly turn up the heat and get people used to that stuff, instead of doing it all overnight.
Why do you think Obama launched a "people on the no-fly list can get guns" attack after a bearded guy in a shack did something? like that guy actually ever boards a flight! watch it turn out that this attack is going to be used to justify "anti-terror" anti-gun laws.
If they don't get what they want though the front door, they go in through the back. They're willing to use anti-Muslim feelings to sneak anti-gun ideas into law.
>>57361681
>>57362192
>>57363673
>>57363312
>4) he met his wife over the internet and flew over to meet her, but his brother-in-law lived in the same city as him.
His brother-in-law, the guy with the glasses at the CAIR conference, is married to Farooq's sister
Sorry real life isn't like your Hollywood movies so scripted and neat
