I don't support sensible gun control
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: I don't support sensible gun control
>I don't support sensible gun control
>>57359474
Gun control saves lives. But you redneck Conservatives can't comprehend that. Who the fuck needs more than 2 guns?
>frost back thinks he's entitled to an opinion on American politics
>>57359433
>sensible gun control
Sensible gun control? Wouldn't that mean banning niggers, spics, and arabs from owning guns?
>>57359433
>Ill shoot you if you dont hand over your guns
>>57359752
I do. Gun Control works pretty well here in Canada. We don't have daily mass shootings like you rednecks everyday. If only you would be bright enough to support it, this shit would happen a lot less on your turf.
>>57359433
Unless you find a way to deter criminals from getting guns, then gun control is waste of time. Lmao I can walk down my street and buy a gun right now.
>>57359826
Technically they'll shoot you either way, it's just a matter of when.
>>57359858
>Lmao I can walk down my street and buy a gun right now.
And that's part of the problem.
>>57359433
I have a question. The 2nd amendment has existed for more than 200 years. Where were the mass shootings then? What is happening is something to do with a problem with society, not guns.
>>57359433
>sensible gun control
Control this you fucking leaf
Yeah, me too good to see you not being a cuc like your PM
http://americangunfacts.com/
http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/
>>57359433
You want it to be more like Chicago?
>>57359433
Id be more than happy with canada's gun laws if they didnt ban anything that looked scary.
Banned AK's
AK equivalents that are functionally the same But are aesthetically different completely legal.
>sensible
>>57359898
>Where were the mass shootings then? What is happening is something to do with a problem with society, not guns.
There were also no machine guns or automatic rifles, that's why.
GUN CONTROL MEANS GUN BAN! Just like going on a diet and watching what you eat means starving to death. Slippery slope. How many mass shootings has your country had Op? Its probably more than ours since we are safe with all our guns on the street
>>57359618
TFW Brazil and Mexico have a higher murder-per-capita rate than America and stricter gun laws.
More niggers = more murder.
All the top murder zones in America are leftist-controlled and full to the brim with niggers.
>>57359827
Canada seems like a pretty safe place. Alright, here's a plan: we send all our niggers, spics, and Muslims to Canada. Under Canada's strict gun control, they'll be utterly unable to murder each other with guns or obtain guns. In america, well be rid of the ones responsible for most firearms related murders. Win win, right? Right. Have fun with diversity.
>>57359827
In fairness, you have a nation of beta males. Even if guns were more common, you faggots wouldn't do shit.
>>57359993
>muh salt rifle theorum
It's because they're black, isn't it? Fucking profiler.
Sensible gun control is fine, we should start by repealing the NFA and ensuring that every state allows concealed carry.
>>57360007
>How many mass shootings has your country had Op? Its probably more than ours since we are safe with all our guns on the street
lol you're a retard
http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-leads-world-in-mass-shootings-1443905359
>>57359618
I do. Guns are tools that do different jobs. Pistol protects me while I'm out, shotgun defends my family when there is a bump in the night, hunting rifle puts food on my table,a black rifle defends my family from attacker invading. Know your facts before you type.
>I don't sensible gun control
ban non-whites from owning guns? but I do.
>>57360074
>you have a nation of beta males
Pretty sure that's the whole West.
>>57360199
No, know yours you retard redneck. Guns are killing machines, period.
>>57360137
"Mass shooting" is a bastardization of mass murder, which the fbi defines as 4 or more people murdered in a single incident. The number of mass murder victims is less than the number of "mass shootings" indicated in your pic. Conclusion: your shit's retarded and you talk like a fag.
>sensible
>gun control
pick one
>>57359618
It's not called the Bill of Needs, faggot
>>57359433
If guns are really for protection and not to kill anyone (excluding hunting) why don't they just fire rubber bullets like riot police do? What's that, the profit margins are higher for real bullets than rubber ones? That would explain it then.
>>57360288
>I don't like the facts and the feeling it gives me that I'm wrong, so I'll namecall.
>>57360248
Guns kill people just like a spoon will make someone fat. If someone wants someone dead, they will kill them. I suppose you want to ban knives as well?
>>57359618
I have 3 guns
>>57359893
I can do this in Canada too.
Only hard part in Canada gun law is get license.
Once have license, thing you can do
>get many guns as you want
>no waiting period at all
>no registry for non-restricted
>can transport non-restricted firearm as long as it is unloaded
>can keep gun next to your bed with ammo loaded in separate mag
>can go inwoods and fire at there for fun
>$200 SKS + $300 of 1500 7.62x39 ammo = good time
>>57360386
Knives have other purposes besides killing. Guns don't.
>>57359827
>daily mass shootings
HOLY SHIT WILL YOU PEOPLE STOP USING THIS ARGUMENT ALREADY.
4+ PEOPLE IN A SHOOTING IS A MASS SHOOTING.
99.5% OF MASS SHOOTINGS ARE NIGGERS SHOOTING OTHER NIGGERS.
THE SHOOTINGS YOU SEE ON THE NEWS, COVERED FOR HOURS, ARE ACTUAL MASS SHOOTINGS.
HOW CAN YOU BE THIS DENSE?
>>57359827
Take a guess as to how many people died in mass shooting since the 1980s
>>57360129
I see what you did there.
"Sensible" to these people is a term that changes constantly until it gets to UK levels of Orwellian nofunz.
>no rifles made out of plastic
later:
>no semi-automatic guns
later:
>no pistols
later:
>no owning more than X amount of guns
later:
>Feds have to come to your house and inspect your display case and ammo
later:
>no long rifles
later:
only flintlock pistols
later:
no gunz allowed, if police can't get to your house fast enough you just die
By that time, Mexicans will have overpopulated in the US and they can behead people with abandon, just like in the old country. Liberal utopia achieved.
>>57359433
What kind of gun control does California have?
If you don't like guns, why not move to a country that outlaws them? Otherwise your only option would be to seize the nation by force and instate your own government that outlaws guns, but I'm pretty sure that'd require a lot of guns to achieve...
>>57360448
kek. Guns are not only for killing.
>>57359433
I support sensible encampment of liberals.
>>57360383
Ah, now this is shitposting. Have fun with those manufactured "facts." I'm going to stick with the truth, though. I bet you can't even define "mass shooting" off the top of your head, just like liberals can't define "assault weapons" without going full retard.
>>57360579
This needs to be a t shirt
>>57360544
They outlawed full stocks.
Why didn't the Muslims get the memo? Obviously Cali needs to increase taxes to fund the postal service better.
>>57360599
>The truth
>Rejecting facts because you don't like them.
Have fun living in fantasy land. You're like those mentally ill trannies who deny reality.
>>57359433
I love that Obama is coming out and saying those on the No Fly List should be banned from having guns
The No Fly Zone is already controversial and you know the majority on the list, if not all, are Muslim. I can't wait for Liberals to come out and say it violates Muslims' (gun) rights and freedom and is Islamophobic.
>>57360701
Lol, you are the one in denial. Your graph is based on a bastardization of a term that is designed to conflate gang violence with school massacres. You might as well quote Pravda as fact.
>>57360701
>Awwww sheeeeit, jus remember not kill more dan 3 o' dem Bloods, or u niggas end up on FBI's mas shooting list
Do they think like this?
>>57360544
Assault weapon ban, magazine limits to 10 or 15, mandatory waiting periods,test before purchase, approved list of handguns where if its not on the list you can't buy it, also the banned a number of firearms by name.
>>57360832
> gets told
> only butthurt in response
I think we're done here. You should seriously consider my suggestion here:
>>57360024
Unless, guns aren't actually the problem, it should work just fine. Enjoy.
>>57360701
ya I guess it look good when gang banger use knifes to kill rival gang member rather than use guns.
>duurrr gang don't count or bullshit like this
your data count those in.
>>57360429
>can have as many guns as I want
>no waiting periods in my state
>no registry for anything
>transport and carry locked and loaded
>keep loaded guns under your pillow if that's your thing
>can go innawoods
>7.62x29 hovers at 20-25 cents a round and SKS prices are 300-400 because demand is higher and no chink and russian imports
But you can buy new AK's and AR's now for under $500, so no reason to have a fixed-magazine SKS.
>>57360873
One Reck P8 or similar copy
One carbine of some sort, probably Eastern Bloc
One cheap German made SAA .22 revolver
yea, dem boyz real strapped guap son
>>57361087
AK is banned in Canada
AR is restricted in Canada so can't use it for hunting or go inwoods with it.
being restricted firearm, it subject to more tougher rule related to transport/storage
and semi-automatic centerfire rifle is limited to 5 round in mag.
SKS is gun to go if you want a cheap semi-auto gun in Canada
I support sensible gun control.
It involves repealing all of the current retarded gun laws and locking liberals up in safe spaces. Nothing safer than a rubber room behind security doors and a fence.
>>57361222
Oh, I know. SVT's too.
>tfw like the fact that y'all can have short barreled shotguns without any BS
I'd love to have one of those Dominion Arms short shotties, but it would be a tax stamp down here.
>>57361415
ya, it provide how dumb Canada law is
can buy <18 inch short barrel shotgun if it made in factory.
but can't cut your own barrel shorter than 18 inch...
I do have my own backpacker shotgun :)
Ok /pol/, I think two things should change.
1. The private resale of firearms should go through a federally licensed dealer, to curb the sale of firearms to felons.
2. Firearm ownership should be allowed only for those who have a passed a hunter safety or general firearms safety class, for the same reason that requirement exists for a cwp.
I'm totally open to being convinced these are bad ideas.
>>57359827
Don't worry, you'll get to join in on the fun after Prime Minister DUDE WEED LMAO imports half of Syria to Canada
>>57359618
>Gun control saves lives.
It doesn't.
Having good asylums, mental care, and a decent social safety net - including quality and mandatory education up to completion of high school saves lives that you think would be saved by gun control.
A class about gun maintenance and safety might save some lives taken by accidental discharge or unsafe use or storage, but those are such a minimal amount of deaths that you might as well just work on better road safety or cheap swimming lessons instead.
>>57360024
>Under Canada's strict gun control
I've got bad news for you, buddy. Canada gun control is taking a (fun) day class, which gets your a card with a code on it. Once you have that card and code, you can buy as many guns as you want in stores or online.
>sensible
>>57361222
>AK is banned in Canada
Only a few models of it are banned.
>>57361595
Number one doesn't even account for 2% of the guns entering the hands of felons. Number two is flat out unconstitutional and I will kek the shit out of any politician who votes for that. That's just asking for "you have to get a 100% and you only get one chance. Now, freehand draw the fire control group for the m14. No rulers allowed." Type of abuse.
>>57362343
Are you being pedantic or do you really not get the meaning behind that post? Because I would really love to see heavy gun control nations take our niggers.
>>57362860
Including externally-similar weapons with entirely different actions, because the RCMP barely knows more than the average noguns.
>>57362213
>A class about gun maintenance and safety might save some lives taken by accidental discharge or unsafe use or storage
It might also deter the kind of degenerates who would use a gun recklessly or in a fit of drunken rage. The sort of people who wouldn't pony up ~$100, or be responsible enough to pass the class.
>>57362860
>Only a few
That's a funny way of saying "all of them"
>>57362213
There are a couple of hundred accidental deaths in the US every year due to firearms.
A couple of hundred in a nation that has more than 350 thousand people and more than half a billion firearms in circulation.
What "problem" are you trying to solve exactly?
>>57362946
>2% of the guns entering the hands of felons
Source? Suggestions for tackling the other 98%?
>abuse
>extreme anti-gun guy becomes a firearms safety instructor and grades students unfairly to prevent any of them from owning guns
That'd be some pretty crazy shit. I don't see that being a common problem, and I think it would be obvious pretty soon what they were doing.
>>57359433
>sensible
liberals don't understand what that word means
sage
