Thoughts on him?
>>57325892
He's a great Senator.
>>57325892
Best candidate.
>>57325999
But could he be a good president?
>>57325892
Daddy's bitchboy
>>57325892
He's having a hard time.
>>57325892
I like him, and I'm not even American
>>57325892
not ron
he has the face of a president.
but not the right attitude, he's beta af...
He has no chance of winning. Though this disappoints me since I like Rand a great deal, I wouldn't want him to be president.
I think Rand's potential would be best reached as a member of the Supreme Court. He is a constitutional scholar after all.
As a Supreme Court justice, Rand would protect our freedoms for many years. He'd be pretty based.
>>57325892
Can't debate to save his life.
>>57326981
Are you kidding? He's one of the most eloquent speakers on Capitol Hill. He's not aggressive like Trump, or vicious like Ben Shapiro, but it's almost impossible to listen to him and not think, "Wow, he's a pretty smart guy and I feel like my opinion is much more informed than before I heard him speak."
>>57326263
>>57327438
I agree, he's not aggressive.
I'm going to vote for him. Only candidate that would do any good in office. He needs to step it up though.
>>57326951
The country is in dire need of a president who believes in the constitution.
>>57325892
He's awesome! I'm Rand Pauls biggest fan and here's my pic with him. If you like Rand Paul you can be just as cool as me!
>>57325892
Good guy, would vote for him if he gets the nomination.
The country needs Trump, Trump can handle the media cartel, but Paul would get eaten alive.
The media would and will destroy any Republican presidency.
>>57325892
Sellout
>>57325892
>Thoughts on him?
Most interesting candidate. But Americans are either too stupid or believe everyone else is too stupid for him to be "electable."
Americans like stupidity, hence Donald Trump.
>>57329409
>>57325892
He needs to get more aggressive with other candidates.
He shouldn't be attacking Trump, though. He should be attacking Bush, Carson, and Rubio.
>>57325892
Voting for him in the primary
Hopes he gets nomination
Will vote Libertarian Party candidate if he is not GOP nominee.
>>57325892
He's gonna be a loser in the primaries.
Like father like son
>>57326067
Nope. Can't filibuster in the executive branch.
>>57332253
Don't need to. You can veto bills and explain exactly why you're vetoing said bill.
Sure, the legislature can overrule you, but it's much harder. A filibuster is far more ineffective than a veto is.
>>57325892
Was a fan until he flipflopped on military spending as soon as he announced he was running for president. He showed his true colors as just another politician and not the libertarian we need.
But then again the rest of the candidates are also trash so meh.
>>57333032
Except that by fillibustering hard enough and often enough, black jesus can use executive authority "to just get something done." Cant get away with that when you veto'd everything before.
>>57335085
DUDE
>>57325892
Rand: president america needs, not the one it deserves
Hillary: the President america deserves, not the the one it needs
>>57330258
He's been slamming Rubio lately and Bush has less chance of winning than an actual bush.
>>57325892
good
Can't wait until Trump loses the general election and then every establishment bootlicker wonders why they didn't win with a candidate that doesn't appeal to constitutionally minded independents
>>57335085
Let me guess and you love trump even though hes flipped on every single core issue that a republican would have contention with?
>>57325999
Agreed, I want him to be Senate majority leader
