![No_Guns[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/YnUuG1y.jpg "No_Guns[1].jpg")
THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO NEED FIREARMS ARE THE POLICE AND THE MILITARY.
WHEN WILL THE KILLING END?
>>57284547
You say that now, but then what happens when a dindu gets shot by the police? Oh, what selective memory you have Mr.Dissonance.
>>57284547
I've used firearms to defend myself. Twice.
Fuck you.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
>>57284547
Fake and gay.
Don't believe me check em
>>57284547
They sure managed to stop the shooter/shooters from shooting 20 and killing 3 when the police were training merely blocks away
>>57284547
>THE POLICE ARE ALL RACIST KILLERS
>ONLY THE POLICE AND THE MILITARY SHOULD OWN GUNS
>>57284547
>Muh police state!
>>57284547
We'll be safe if only the cops carried guns.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpQzNBYcfzU
>>57284547
>THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO NEED FIREARMS ARE THE POLICE AND THE MILITARY
Shall not be infringed. Deal with it.
>>57284547
Gun bans have no effect on the number of people killed per capita.
>>57284547
Yeah, they certainly know how to take down a knife wielding dope head.
_Shall Not be Infringed!_
>>57284547
look at this statist boot licker
"Banning things doesn't work guys. Laws are pointless."
>>57288714
Uh what
If anything that's lib logic
>Criminals don't obey gun laws, therefore we should ban guns
>>57284547
> THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO NEED FIREARMS ARE THE POLICE AND THE MILITARY.
> WHEN WILL THE KILLING END?
When people stop saying the first sentence.
>>57288714
Disincentives do not come from statutes they come from law enforcement and prosecution. These disincentives only work on rational agents and therefore there will always be people not dissuaded from criminal acts. Laws that are unenforceable will always produce little to no disincentives.
