Why Abortion is Wrong
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: Why Abortion is Wrong
Feminists think abortion should be a right of any woman.
Wrong. the tiny human growing inside is equally made from a man 50% of each genetic material is fused to make a new human whom need a safe womb to grow.
Would it be logical that to abort a human on equal terms the women should have the consent of the father.
And even if 2 people agree to kill their child why should that be allowed. we are all the excretions of our genetic code and each of us started life at the moment the egg and sperm cell fused.
Its a Logical wrong to kill a human whom haven't gotten a chance to live just because the mother is to lazy to wait 9 months.
You cant controll it anyway, if it would be illegal it would be done in secret under shitty conditions.
>>57267974
>wrong
subjective
>>57267974
If you can, you take your 50% out of my body and take care of it. If you can't then stfu.
>>57268721
Bunch of cells ain't life. It's hard to call it "someone". You can't murder an unborn thing.
>>57268876
It has a beating heart. That's pretty much a life.
>>57268322
I dont think so, because its allowed a lot more chose abortion because its a legal option.
some might do it. but on a much smaller scale.
>>57268430
logic is not subjective. a logical right is the truth. how you feel about it is irrelevant compared to the logic.
>>57268544
Oh dont forget the life that lives inside your body, is that your right to, to end a life that is living inside of you, in fact its not your body anymore the moment that life starts inside of you, your body is shared, and you have no right to take that life.
>>57267974
What's that? Women want to live their lives free from all consequences of their horrific actions?
When did this start???
>>57268876
your just a bunch of cells to. those cells have its own unique genetic code just like you, its as much human as anyone else.
>>57268876
>says the bunch of cells
If you have kidney failure you can't force someone to give you their kidney so why do fetuses get to use your organs without your consent?
>>57267974
I disagree. Children are a privilege, not a right.
It is the woman's body who is affected by the pregnancy so it stands to reason that she should have the final say in what happens with it.
Abortion shouldn't be used as a method of contraception, but I do agree with it. I would rather have the ethical debate of whether it is "killing a child" or not than have kids brought into this world who aren't wanted, can't be supported, and end up being funded by the state and living crappy lives.
>>57268876
Aren't we all technically bunches of cells?
>>57269026
>how you feel about it is irrelevant compared to the logic.
Wait till you get to ethics class.
>>57267974
if you're basing ownership from DNA, women supply 100% of the mitochondrial DNA and 50% of the nuclear DNA, as well as every cellular mechanism
literally why do you care
>>57268876
yes a bunch of cells turn into a human via magic or whatever the fuck
>>57269078
Because tumors are mutated human cells with their own genetic code do they have rights also?
>>57269026
you sound like a vegan
>>57269185
Ethics is just a social construct, logic is not.
you cant refute logical truths based on feelings.
that's applying your own fantasy to reality. and I do think that falls under mental illness.
>>57267974
>I am a real-life, damn near Snow F’ing White (super pale AND gifted at dwarf wrangling) from the Midwest who blogs regularly about my kids’ antics, my husband’s sketchy facial hair, and shitting myself. When I'm not cleaning up doggy snot & random bodily fluids (from the kids, pervs!), I find time to share about my unique life raising a typical child & two profoundly disabled children, laughing all the way. - direct quote from the mother
>being against abortion
>being against abortion after birth
shiggy, etc
Do you have a right to outright kill it?
No, I guess you don't.
Do you have a right to unhook anyone leeching off of your body for any reason you see fit, at any time, regardless of what that means for the leech?
Yeah, I think you should have that right, because it's your body. If they can't survive on their own, tough shit, that doesn't give anyone the right to leech on you.
Better dead than forced to live a shitty life.
I'm more or less neutral, I support abortion for medical reasons/rape and I guess if people fuck up to but it should not become norm, use contraception kids.
>>57269453
See>>57268721
You have no right over someone else's body.
>>57269428
lets cherry pick from a few and apply it to everyone. sure sound like people whom stand with the right to abort life, are just the same as religious fundamentalists.
>>57269532
Yeah, which is why nobody has the right to hook into my body to leech off of it.
I don't have the right to do that to anyone else, why should the child have that right?
At what age do you lose the right to leech off of other people's body?
>>57269456
id rather have a shitty life and fight for a better life for my self, than to have no chance to give life a fight.
>ban abortion
>vast majority of 300,000 planned parenthood abortions are black
>most to would-be single moms
its population control.
>>57269612
>nobody has the right to hook into my body to leech off of it
By that logic you should have not hooked your dick into someone's body and put another body there.
It's not murder! It's just a cluster of cells! A cluster of cells that's the beginning of a human life, but we can just ignore that part. I don't want to be responsible for my own actions!
>>57269612
since 1980s half a million healthy humans have been killed in the womb just in Norway.
that's 10% of everyone alive today.
We all leech of each other, that's what makes any dominat life form strong, the ability to stand on each others will to live. Aborting that Will is logically wrong, since it means we are killed of the very thing that gives up strength.
>>57269682
>and fight for a better life for my self
Except for the fact that's not possible for everybody. How many oportunities will have the nigger child of a 17-year old whore? At best he'll end as a dindu.
You don't own the rights to any genes except your own. If you happen to misplace some inside your girlfriend or one night stand, that's your fault for not pulling out.
If laws are enacted to require the consent of both parties it would give a man the ability to legally force a woman into a relationship with him. This could promote rape as a legitimate way of claiming a female companion.
>>57268876
You're just a bigger bunch of cells.
>>57269864
I feel you. Since 1989, 32 million abortions have been done here. And we're 19 million of all..
>>57269752
You obviously are allowed to have such a parasitic relationship if there's consent, but the one being leeched off of should be allowed to end it at any time.
Alternatively, I guess we could try to find a way to block the umbilical cord from actually getting any nutrition, since you're not even touching someone else's body at that point, you're just not funneling nutrition there.
Would this be acceptable?
Whose rights are you violating by taking all the nutrition for yourself?
We already agree the child is a separate body, a separate person, so surely it doesn't have the right to force the woman to feed it?
>>57270144
She agreed to that the moment she let a big throbbing cock inside of her.
Anything that results in less people on the freeway I'm fine with.
Say something guys this is embarrassing
