We are Anonimous
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: We are Anonimous
When Trump’s many statements were fact-checked, it was discovered that only 7% of what the presidential candidate spouts is true.
http://anonhq.com/indeed-just-7-of-what-donald-trump-says-is-factually-accurate/
>inb4 americlap shills
That's seven percent higher than any other politician out there.
>hillary isn't as much of a liar
fuck off australia
>>57261748
I'm sure they'll be here soon to brag about how much cum they would guzzle off their maymay candidate.
>>57261792
>>57261809
under a minute as expected
>>57261859
>robin hat
Im jelly I never could afford one.
>>57261631
That's because he just doesn't give a fuck.
>>57261631
I'll let you in on a secret, emu-san:
We don't care what Trump says, we care that he doesn't back down and apologize whenever he hurts somebody's feelings. His campaign would crash and burn if we had an even semi-electable candidate to run against him, but all our candidates are dogshit and everyone goes along with it like the naked emperor.
>>57261631
I'm not voting for anyone. It doesn't matter who's president, same agenda.
>>57261631
Whats worse 10 little lies or 1 big lie?
>>57261631
So that puts him well within the parameters for a normal politician, what is the problem.
>cherrypicking 74 out of 29500 tweets
>using tweets to determine how true someone is
If they used his speeches it would make sense, but this is fucking ridiculous.
>>57262075
Haven't you watched American news in the past few years? Reading a 'tweet' on the air and then talking about it qualifies as hard-hitting journalism these days.
>>57261631
>This liberal website checked Trump's "FACTS" and found them to be false.
I totally did not expect that. I guess it's absolute fact now that everything Trump says is false. Thanks for clearing it up.
In all seriousness, the problem with a fact checking organization like Politifact is that other people need to, in fact, fact check them. Because they've made numerous mistakes. It's not like they're an actual research group, just some dickholes who get paid to look things up.
>>57261631
Oh you, silly Aussie.
>>57262628
you can check their sources yourself any time you want, it's not like they hide them. the links are always in the articles/explanations.
but as you demonstrate, it's easier to avoid doing that and instead just scream "hurr durr liberal bias" like a bitch.
>>57263092
Right, and people do look up their sources, and find out they're full of shit. Politifact doesn't check facts, they give opinions. Studies are not facts.
I don't even care about studies to begin with, so citing sources doesn't mean a whole hell of a lot to me. I don't really trust scientists anymore since every 5 years, their published "peer reviewed" studies wind up being inaccurate bullshit. How anyone can still have faith in studies after this long is strange to me, or maybe I'm just getting old.
>>57261631
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/
>>57262016
write yourself in for president. I encourage everyone to do this, for teh lulz.
>>57261631
>you can check their sources yourself any time you want, it's not like they hide them.
Politifact is run by the Tampa Bay Times which is a very Liberal publication.
Their rulings are excessively one-sided and the determinations provided are very editorialized.
![Trump-650x250[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/uFqz6i1.jpg "Trump-650x250[1]")
