There is no way this bitch festival can last ten hours without casualties.
>>57256991
first for ISIS
Second for YPG
First for rare flag
>>57256991
third for Syrian hamsters
Angus Robertson is being smart here. They won't reply and he and the SNP now have fuel for political attacks whenever the ISIS intervention is brought up in the future...
angus robertson confirming that moderates don't exist and that turkey is scum for bombing YPG
based
I've stopped listening to this scottish windbag. Rage Corbyn was actually more compelling, if wrong.
>>57257157
>Rage Corbyn
yes he was certainly mad.
he's posed a simple question about specific numbers of moderates
very, very effective because cameron knows hard numbers are bullshit with like 50 rebel groups that inter-mix
complete failure to answer that exposes the flimsy argument of "muh moderates will fill the gap"
>Mfw Robertson is making a good point
What the fuck, wipe ISIS off the map and leave Assad to it tbqh
Fresh happenings
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3342645/University-Islamic-Society-students-make-death-threats-disrupt-lecture-human-rights-activist.html
OMG STFU ABOUT THE TERMINOLOGY
NO BODY CARES FFS
LITERAL SEMANTICS
>the former british empire now spends its days debating the use of one name over another
have you british people committed suicide at how irrelevant you are now
LIVE STREAM:
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
LIVE STREAM:
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
LIVE STREAM:
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
LIVE STREAM:
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
http://official-britpol.co.uk/
Labour Muslim MP shilling for name change.
Don't want a link with Islam do we?
>Where are the 70k troops?
>Stop nitpicking bro
>>57257296
You control the language, you control the people. Come on Straya, you should know this with all the top quality language-manipulating shit-posting you do.
Scotland needs to fuck off
>>57257358
The genius of the government is in this is that it actually is nitpicking in this vote.
They can't attack the bombing policy, just the tacked on 'oh and we'll find some solution blah blah moderates blah blah remove Assad in the future'.
>>57257214
Christ that place is a shithole.
>>57257405
we really do but us haggiskikes control this island
Do people in Britain like Corbyn? More than Milliband?
>>57257501
milliband was a harmless fool . . Corbyn is a dangerous fool.
I don't like either of them.
>>57257565
I don't give a shit about you, I'm asking about public opinion.
We are so fucked if we start bombing. So, so fucked.
>>57257501
People like the Islamic State more than Miliband.
If I genuinely believed that airstrikes were going to help, I would support them, even with some Syrian collateral damage. But I just think they will make Britain a bigger terrorist target and will encourage more Syrians to join ISIS in the fight against the West. So how is the UK going to benefit from this?
>>57257501
I think he's a bit of an idiot but at least he says what he thinks. All UK politicians are basically the same nowadays so it's good for politics. But he is far too left-wing in some ways.
>>57257405
Fucking this.
Also, what the fuck happened to them? They used to hate everyone, not just the English, now they're SJWs bar respect for the English.
>>57257501
No
The hard left of Britain (aided by a relatively small number of Tory activists) got elected Corbyn as Labour leader with only 400,000 votes. When you compare those 400,000 votes out of a country with over 60,000,000 people, you see that his alleged popularity was a massive overstatement.
>>57257501
Corbyn is polling lower than Miliband, and he polled pretty low, so no
>>57257597
How?
You realise that the RAF is already bombing IS in Iraq, right?
Why are there so much more degenerate Labour MPs than degenerate Tory MPs?
>>57257501
Doesn't matter who's fronting Labour; the tribals will vote for whoever is wearing a red tie. Look at the SNP - they voted in a fucking child to represent them in parliament.
>The Commons day began at 11:30 GMT, with a vote expected at about 22:00 GMT
Jesus christ are they seriously expecting to argue this for that long?
>>57257670
Actually he would have won without the new members' votes, Labour party members are just dumb
>>57257670
>400,000 votes out of a country with over 60,000,000 people
Are you retarded mate?
It was a party vote.
Party members voter, not members of the public.
>>57257593
Well you got my opinion only 65 million more to get, you obnoxious kiwi cunt.
>>57257501
'no'
>>57257306
>>57257724
Anything less than close to a whole day of debate and people would say it wasn't debated enough. The Commons is already going quiet, nothing important should come up now.
>>57257501
>Islam, a religion started by a Warlord to justify expansion, that has been waging jihad against Europe non-stop since 700 AD, is not represented by ISIL.
Someone get this geriatric fuck away from the mic.
>>57256991
There is already a brit/pol/ general you fucking mong
>>57257441
I don't think the debate even matters Cameron must have enough Conservatives to support him or he wouldn't have called the vote, not after last time anyway.
>All this is just for Keks at Labour's expense... and to weaken Corbyn.
>>57257707
we're bombing in iraq with an actual army behind it
70,000 is a complete fabrication and we have no idea how many are radicalists. Even if we damage IS they fill the gap and we become further embroiled in a proxy war involving Assad and Russia. It's a complete shambles.
>>57257726
2 of the other 3 candidates should've backed the other one against Corbyn but they were all cunts
>>57257624
>will encourage more Syrians to join ISIS in the fight against the West.
i doubt that. syrians have plenty of options in the way of militarised jihadist groups and ISIS isn't going to get any sympathy if they get the snot bombed out of then. groups like nusra, ahrar and jaysh are far likelier to capitalise on the situation. honestly, people need to be worried about nusra as more of a long-term threat than isis because by the end of this nusra will be deeply embedded in syrian society.
>>57257842
He got a majority from 1st preferences so it probably wouldn't have made a difference
>>57257829
But none of that really matters. They're talking about bombing Assad's enemies and it wouldn't be possible for us to change target to Assad since they have Russian support.
At best this is token and meaningless and at worst we end up speeding up Assad's victory.
Why would anyone vote for a leftist faggot(Corbyn) who wants to install Sharia laws in UK? Why is this cunt even allowed to participate in politics? I know Sweden is fucked but what about United Kingdom? Is it that bad?
>>57257811
Keep making them til we get sticky?
>>57258053
oh fuck off already with your nonsense, you just sound retarded
who is nosferatu?
>>57258053
he's like the nice crazy old uncle that comes round at Christmas..you see him once..he talks some sense..then starts going all out nuts.
This will be the finish of him.
As for the lets not call them islamic state...no, lets. I for one dont want any more Islamic thoughts coming in to every day life here in the UK.
Reminder if you are for airstrikes you are for propping up the "70,000 moderates" and against based Assad.
CRISPIN BLUNT
the honourable gentleman would like to suggest that your blunt isn't crispy enough and would like to offer his support in crispin' your blunt
We'll be debating bombing Al Nusra in Syria in a couple of years after they fly a plane into the heart of London next
>>57258169
>posts weeb pictures
>expects anyone to listen
>>57258169
Based on what? Airstrikes is just hitting a wasp nest with a stick.
CUT THEM OFF AT THE FUCKING SOURCE: THE FUCKING ARAB STATES FUNDING THEM.
>>57258169
reminder that anime is trash
>>57257214
Deport that union. Airdrop them over IS territory. Let them buy parachutes if they can afford them.
>>57258423
>thinks anime is trash
>visits 4chan
>>57258487
Anime is fucking trash. Everyone knows that.
>>57258487
>thinking 4chan is exclusively anime
dumb weeaboo
abandon thread, go to brit/pol/
>>57258169
>Same Brit always posting this anime shit
Please stop, you're embarrassing us.
>>57258381
But they're our valued, progressive allies in the region anon. They would never work against our interests. No lets just carpet bomb Raqqa, what could go wrong?
>>57258345
>Karen in a britpol thread
>Weeb
It's ok if your new anon.
It's funny how you guys take yourselves this seriously.
Evan US and France are almost irrelevant in Syria and Iraq, let alone you guys.
>>57258687
No you keep posting this shit and pretend you are established.
"I was here last year blah blah blah"
You are a pathetic twat . . .Fuck off.
>>57258819
POO IN LOO
O
O
I
N
L
O
O
>>57258687
realpolitik bruh, no one really wants to be allied with those ragheads
>>57258873
check the flag again faggot
>I've been called a pacifist, and worse.
>>57258946
POO IN COFFEE
O
O
I
N
C
O
F
F
E
E
>>57258873
>>>/Rotherham /
>>57257214
Why would you allow Atheists to talk in you Islamic safe space. Make's no sense.
Where did all the MPs go? Are they getting pissed in the bar on £1.50 pints?
>>57258819
with the greatest of respect, your post is not only irrelevant in this thread it is demonstrably false.
Can we get back to discussing important stuff now?
The Uk supported Iran in the nuclear deal remember that.
>>57259099
yes
This lasts ten hours, they'll be back later for the important people.
>>57257501
Corbyn has very poor approaval ratings. Labour is bouncing along their core support level, at around 30%. This time in the last electoral cycle they were 10% ahead, currently they're 10% behind. So no, nobody likes Corbyn much.
Aside from all that, Labour are only going to add support in the areas they already win comfortably anyway (and maybe not even that, looking at Oldham). 4 years is a long old time in politics, but it's going to take a pretty major change for Corbyn to win the next election.
>>57258169
>bombing Assad's enemies is somehow detrimental to him
OK
>>57259690
>"We believe there are around 70,000 Syrian opposition fighters - principally the Free Syrian Army - who do not belong to extremist groups... and with whom we can co-ordinate attacks on ISIL."
These 70,000 potential "allies" are all fighting to overthrow Assad. This shit at best will do exactly as stated and free up a front for our "allies", allowing them to concentrate fully on putting a western puppet on the throne. At worst this mandate will be stretched to allow us to bomb Assad as well.
Based Julian "Slobodan Milosevic" Lewis rekting Cameron's "70,000" moderate rebel bullshit.
>>57260321
We will never bomb Assad while they have the support of Russia, and while we're bombing the IS, Russia will be bombing the """"" moderates""""".
There's no way this action would be detrimental to Assad more than the benefit it would bring him.
Everything written in Anglo-Zionist controlled media has to be understood within the context of the fact that it is Anglo-Zionist controlled. For example Aftonbladet is owned by the oligarch jewish family Schibstedt, which for decades have written Neocon propaganda, multiculturalist propaganda, pro-massmigration propaganda, feminist propaganda, you get the picture etc. .
Why, then, does Anglo-Zionist media decide to give attention to russian accusation of Erdogan making oil deals with ISIS? Go to aftonbladet.se and svd.se, and you will see that they're giving this attention, why? What has happened between Erdogan and his Anglo-Zionist masters that they're giving green light for those articles?
wrong thread lel
>>57260991
Don't worry friend, we saw your flag before bothering to read your post.
