http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/613337/Bionic-bonking-with-robots-will-become-more-common-than-normal-sex-claims-doctor
Scientists say that we will be having sex with robots by 2025. Win?
>we
speak for yourself. i can actually get pussy
>>57243917
Same but im still interested in this. Maybe as a toy and hopefully it will drive stupid women to be more than a walking vagina.
http://www.ijreview.com/2015/10/434513-sex-industry-grown-much-researchers-believe-people-will-sex-robots-2050/
>>57243917
What do you do for the 364 days of the year you can't get pussy.
>>57243872
I'd prefer fully immersive VR
>>57244223
This t.b.h f.a.m.
>>57244223
It's comin soon m8
>>57243872
What the fuck is the point of doing it then. Do you need pleasure that badly?
>>57243872
Did any of you even read it?
>Women will choose artificial intelligence SEX ROBOTS over men by 2025 say researchers
Basically it will be the final cuc.kening.
Also
>express.co.uk
Discarded, the express is retarded and known for making shit up.
>>57243872
This is silly. It says that WOMEN will choose robos over men, but women are the emotional constituents. Unless we also have convincing AIs by then, it is going to be men opting out of human relationships in favor of slamming bionic vag.
Not that it won't apply broadly eventually, but I find it humorous that the headline insists that it will be women specifically who opt out, particularly when the article itself (I skimmed through it) seems to be gender neutral.
Why then would the headline be gendered? To make men feel threatened? Does that say more about men than women? I'm not implying anything.
>>57243872
You'd think a doctor would have an easy enough time getting laid that he wouldn't hold out for robotic sex slaves.
>>57244595
>women are scared of sex robots taking their beta meal ticket away
>oy vey you bad boyim we'll be hooking up with chadbot unless you ban sexbots
>>57243917
Look at this faggot
>>57244454
They'll give up the robots the moment they realize they can't sue for alimony.
>>57243872
>More common
So is masturbation, what the fuck is the point of this article?
>>57244595
I would love it if I could have an AI virtual reality boyfriend. Real men are shit.
>>57245456
Are you happy with anything right now?
>>57244595
>but women are the emotional constituents
But isn't that the advantage of a AI boyfriend? Why do you think romance novels are so popular? Real men are selfish and hateful with no concept of love or loyalty.
An AI or virtual reality man would be everything that I want him to be, both in bed and out. I could have whatever hot sex I like with him and he wouldn't judge me negatively or shame me for my desires. I wouldn't have to hold back, and I would still be able to have romance and intimacy.
>>57245908
This post is a potent combination of stupid and degenerate.
>>57243872
>express
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/11898241/By-2050-human-on-robot-sex-will-be-more-common-than-human-on-human-sex-says-report.html
>>57246087
>Wanting emotion, love, and sex is degenerate
Male priorities
>>57245290
this
>>57245908
Because they are emotional. What they "want" is not what they want. That is necessarily conflicting.
They want to feel jealous, but they don't want to be jealous. They want be teased, or left hanging, but don't want to be neglected. They want attention, but don't want to be crowded.
Maybe AI will be better at it, but if history is any indication, "AI" will either be even worse because it is predictable, eliminating the element of spontaneity that excited women; resulting in them becoming bored. OR it will be 'too good', in so far as they simply emulate man to such a degree that they might as well be real men.
Have you even read romance novels? They're full of affairs, broken hearts, and otherwise despicable people. It is never about the prince charming that turns up at the end. The bulk of these novels is about the awful horrible men that make the protagonist's life exciting. They audience doesn't actually want the prince charming, that's why the stories end "happy". No one wants to read about the boring beta kek that gets caught up with the emotional wreckage protagonist. Certainly not the women.
>>57245290
They'll sue a man for alimony then fuck a robot for 100 years with the weekly check.
>>57245908
>Romance
>From 1's and 0's
No, you don't want romance, you want convenience and ability to get anything you want without compromise
>>57246191
>What they "want" is not what they want.
L-O-L. Stopped reading there. Catchphrase of every fedora redpill faggot who thinks they've got wimminz figured out.
We view characters as people on a certain level, and thus, we develop attachments to them. This is why women love yaoi of their favorite characters in them instead of with random dudes. Except, in virtual reality, you can insert yourself into it. You can model different boys to be whatever you want them to be and have relationship with lots of boys with different personalities, maybe even at the same time. I could have a cute shota boy who dresses as a maid and have a naughty big sister relationship with him, or I could chose to be the submissive one in a relationship with a different boy. You say that I don't know what I want because I'm a woman, but I know what I want all too well.
>>57246279
>convenience and ability to get anything you want without compromise
So? Doesn't everyone? Romance doesn't need compromise.
>>57246679
ha ha ha ha
>>57246241
They already do this doe, they just built the most important parts first.
>>57246780
A part of everyone wants that, but that not romance, that's just a lie your telling yourself to feel good.
Romance is about the challenge too, it's about the give and take. When a guy gives you a gift he worked on and made himself, it matters more because you know that meant something to him, he cared enough that whatever inconvenience and work he had to do do meant less than you. Someone who does everything for you because it is all they are, they can't give anything of any worth because they have no worth.
>>57243917
Lel, here's the fag from the other thread that can't capitalize and brags about his mature taste in cartoons.
>tfw the amount of furry stuff that's going to come out due to sex robots
>>57244454
I didn't know these robots could produce free money and have a respectable status with a large network of friends.
>>57246241
so how will they sue a random person for alimony, unless the government forces men, which in a all likelihood will happen.
>>57246897
This is a retarded argument and you know it. "Romance" is not striving hard for a goal, it's emotional love. An AI does not need to be predictable, it could have it's own set of quirks and flaws that make it unique. No one likes a character who has no flaws. The only difference is that an AI would have flaws that are tolerable and endearing rather than shitty and selfish like most men. I could also love as many as I want and they could look however I want.
>>57247549
A robot can't give you emotional love, and in the back of your head you know it.
Your desire to "love" as many as possible shows how divorced you are from the concept of actual love.
Yes, flaws should be bearable for you, and even enduring, no one is telling you to simply go for whatever you can, but taking the easy path instead of finding someone you want is cowardice.
>>57247549
Also, I've always wanted to kidnap a normal dud and make him into a slave. Dress him in degrading feminine clothing, play with his butt, ect. But I would feel bad doing that to an real guy and would go to jail, so a virtual reality boy sounds like a nice alternative. Hell, I could even have a harem of different kinds of boys, like a dating sim, but real. I want sex like any human, but I don't want to give men the pleasure of fucking me. Men want women to be chaste sexual servant bent on his pleasure, we must rid ourselves of our womanly sexuality to be deemed worthy in his eyes. But, we have urges, too, some are nasty. This alternative allows women to live our sexual fantasies without suffering the dangers and shame real men would impose on us for seeking our own pleasure. This idea threatens men because they can't control us sexually anymore.
Great, I already fuck thermoplastic elastomer anyway.
>>57243872
>sexpert
>futurologist
How professional.
>>57248007
Then go find a guy who'll play make believe with you so you can make believe kidnap him or whatever. Women want men to be fairly chaste to, it's only nature. Every woman I've ever dated has hounded me about my sexual history hoping the numbers are as low as possible. In the long run this whole more is better mentality has ruined people's happiness. Also I don't know what men you've met, maybe you're from some shitty part of the US. but unless you have some really freaky shit most guys are either cool with it or possibly into it, and it's not impossible to find people who share you interest. It's pointless to holdout for this AI shit anyway, most sane computer science people think this whole super AI idea is kinda bs.
>>57248379
>Then go find a guy who'll play make believe with you so you can make believe kidnap him or whatever.
But that would be awkward and boring. It also wouldn't be long term like I want and I couldn't do whatever I want to him.
>Women want men to be fairly chaste to, it's only nature.
But real men are not chaste, they're programmed to sleep around with as many woman as possible. You'll only hurt yourself by getting emotionally invested in a man and expecting him to hold sexual fidelity to you.
Feminism will find a way to prevent this from happening.
>>57248651
Well I'm sure some guys are into it for long term, but why would it be awkward and boring any more so than a robot?
> You'll only hurt yourself by getting emotionally invested in a man and expecting him to hold sexual fidelity to you.
You either got hurt by someone or you took the whole biologypill a little too seriously. Any way isn't that whole risk part of the very concept of romance, trusting someone to catch and all that, or has degeneracy erase all meaning?
>>57246679
But you're not even a girl
>>57246996
>>57248651
>boring
This is the key word and you don't even realize why.
>>57248007
>virtual reality boy sounds like a nice alternative
I know right, no homo.
>>57249497
>boring
How would an AI be boring? Real men are boring. He wouldn't act upset or happy, he's being paid. Fucking a man who isn't interested in you is the worst, no woman does it. What we do a lot of is masturbating, though. An AI would basically be living out your fantasies without the shit real men put you through. You have yet to explain what's so bad about AI's with anything other than "it's not abusive enough women only want biker chad dick, I know these things".
It's men who are constantly searching for variety. Women settle down and want a peaceful life, men want YOLO. Notice how men think of marriage as the end of their freedumb while women idolize it? We want stability in our lives.
>>57249914
>How would an AI be boring
>a man who isn't interested in you is the worst
Like I said, you don't even realize why.
>>57249914
We used to be happy to get married, Femenism and modern society has taken away all the benefits of it.
>>57249914
You're just as bad as men who tell you what you want though. You're telling men what they want. My best friend asked his girlfriend to marry him like 4 months into the relationship. Don't let your bad experiences ruin all of you hope for anything real
>>57243872
Am I the only one who prefers a lovely marriage with a nice christian girl?
>>57250224
No. Jesus loves that too.
>>57250224
You can be married and have sex robot on the side.
>>57250245
>Jesus loves that too.
What exactly did he said about that?
>>57243872
Yes and we will have Flying Cars something around 2012!
lmao this broad is fucking retarded
>>57243917
>I will still spend time and money trying convince a potential rape accuser to play mind games with me when I can just go to an e-brothel and fuck a literally flawless 10/10 whore who gives perfect blowjobs and will never try to start talking to me about dumb nonsense in the middle of the night or break shit before leaving because she was snooping on my phone and saw an offensive text
whatever floats your boat, senpai
>>57243917
Fine. More subservient loli sexbots for me then.
>>57243872
>robowaif
>install artiwomb mkV-A, specially chosen Aryan egg stocks from a 6'4 10/10
>have a load of genetically pure kids
>waifubot programmed to be the perfect mother
>50's tinted scifi family structure
>wanting used up sluts instead of this
>>57244188
Fuck your mom
>>57246123
>2050
We were born one generation off from being able to enjoy the waifu age from the best age.
>>57253075
We'll make it mate.
>>57243872
Not unimaginable, sex between private individuals is becoming over-regulated to a point where nuanced social interaction is being replaced with literal contracts.
>>57252970
>send several million top-of-the-line models to Africa
>highly durable, can withstand beatings and stabbings, skin is flame retardant
>appearances modeled on the most beautiful Scandinavian women
>no wombs, obviously
>no more Africans in 50> years
>>57243872
I hope they come with feminine penises.
>>57253114
We'll be able to enjoy it, but can you imagine being around 20 when waifu bots hit? If OP is right then we have another 10 years to go and if the telegraph is right then there's another 35 years. We missed it.
There is going to be a generation that will enjoy waifu bots and have sufficient health care that their life will be longer and better than ours. And we'll watch them and be jealous.
>>57253208
you have no heart
>>57243872
Once completely obedient and subservient female sexbots come out, real women are expendable. Society will round up the girls, execute adult women, and train the girls to become the next generation of breeders while the procreation problem is being solved.
Eventually, they'll be able to make sexbots that can create human children. The only thing they really have that is of value is to get knocked up. They can genetically modify human DNA to just create breasts that can produce milk, a womb, ovaries, and female eggs. This can then be placed inside the sexbots.
Most women, even pro "Patriarchy" and the breeders will be exterminated. A few real women will be kept for novelty purposes, with some genetically modified to become subservient cumdumpsters without the ability to procreate.
That's effectively the end of women.
>>57253284
Nah man. Medical science will go forward in time with this. We'll get old as hell and probably be able to undergo conscience transfer. So just don't get hit by a car or train and we'll make it
>>57243872
Scientists also thought the earth was flat at one point.
Who gives a shit what those fuckbois say.
Sex bots will let you fuck little girls of you're into that that's worth something at least.
To be quite honest, I don't think we'll ever get a satisfying AI by then though. It'd probably better to focus on material science and making the robogirls feel like real girls.
Most of you would be pretty content with a real doll that actually looked real, and a warm hole, right? We don't need AI for that--you could program a blowjob on something like a Raspberry Pi attachment if you want.
>>57243872
Elaborate dildos and fleshlights. Nothing is going to change except a better masturbatory experience.
>>57243917
Enjoy your STD's from your own mother.
