"Using sophisticated robotics to develop realistic human dolls capable of performing sex acts is "very disturbing indeed," said campaign leader Dr Kathleen Richardson. Dr Richardson believes humanoid sex robots reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of women."
http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/605284/Creepy-Sex-Robots-Warning-Ban-UK
I, for one, welcome our new sex robot overlords
>>56972024
pic related, "Dr." Kathleen Richardson.
The future economy obviously needs to be free food and shelter, but you are gonna work for the robot waifu
>>56972024
Aren't modern women robots enough? They got make-up, fake tits, fake lips...etc. different beauty surgeries.
>>56972182
Nobody is fucking comrade sumo
>fucks girlfriend
>"having sex with women is degrading to them"
>>56972182
>implying anybody would fuck her even if there weren't sex robots
>>56972024
>Using sophisticated robotics
>sohisticated
>robots
What? Robots are not fucking living being born with feelings. Robots are machines. You can costumize them, you have a choiche to not put fucking artifical inteligent in them!
>Dr Richardson believes humanoid sex robots reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of women.
So why isn't she campaigning to ban cash-dispensing vibrators?
>>56972024
What kills me about this is how the "Dr" won't come out and be honest about what really scares her. If sex robots level the playing field, women will be judged just like men and will be found wanting without the help of their golden vaginas.
>>56972024
>Dr Richardson believes humanoid sex robots reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of women.
>reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes
Yes, of course. That is their default criticism of anything and everything
>>56972182
EVERY FUCKING TIME
>>56972024
Oh so she's slapping a gender label on sex robots? That's pretty sexist of you doc.
>>56972182
Someone tell her there'd be robotic Chads too and that she's trying to ban them.
sex robots are disgusting desu, what kind of a pathetic man has sex with a robot? go out and get a real woman and get married and have some fucking kids like a real man
>>56972024
>http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/605284/Creepy-Sex-Robots-Warning-Ban-UK
I agree that is creepy and pathetic but c'mon, free market, if they are not comiting any crime let them be, policing other's private life is as pathetic as buying a sex robot.
>>56972024
the problem with white men is they tend to be apart from nature, hence the withe woman go for niggers.
Sex robots are dangerous.
https://vimeo.com/12915013
>>56972024
if there is a market, she can't do shit.
what will they argue? that it's unethicall? what's the difference etween that and stuffing a dildo up your twat?
one day woman will be an extint animal and it has been further from it. Human robots are almost a reality, when it becomes a standardized industrial product, perfection will be reached, AI will also be more sophisticated, and transplants of uterus will be available as well as creating your own in a lab.
since women are only annoying, demanding little shits men will prefer the robots and the company of their fellow man.
I dream with a world with only white men living in it.
no niggers
no muslims
no jews
no women
only us
/comfy/
>>56972257
Robots are usefull, cost less and dont get diseases from Tyrones and Pedros
>>56972024
For some reason, I'm kind of happy that some of these dumb cunts realize what's about to happen to all the other dumb cunts who listened to them.
>>56972888
>Get married
The joke gets funnier everytime you tell it
As it seems that the two sexes hate each other more and more as time passes, sex robots will be inevitable
>>56972182
Even opening that photo made me feel a slight gravitational tug in her direction.
>>56972888
I am going to get a sex robot and a vr headset and I will rape an endless supply of anime bitches all I want and no one will stop me.
>>56972888
You crack me up anon
>MFW these feminists won't be honest about why they don't want sex bots around
>MFW in 20 years we'll be able to fuck robots and women will lose their vagina privilege
fucking kek
>you aren't entitled to sex, women don't owe you anything
>ban sexbots
Pick one and only one, roastie whores
>>56972024
The million dollar question:
>"Doctor Richardson, since you feel very strongly about sexism, how do you feel about men being overly sexualized by women, and thus suffering at these expectations?
Or...does this equality not apply to a penis?"
/pol/ was right again
Now we hammer them into banning dildos too
>>56972024
>>56972182
Goddamn does this fat ugly bitch not realize they'll make a male sex robot so she can finally pull a dick into her with her gravitational pull.
>>56972024
I'm quite conflicted about this.
On one hand, it can only encourage irresponsibility, ineptness, passivitey and beta-omega behavior in a world where males are already terrifyingly emasculated
On the other hand, it will effectively rob women of their first, last and only real bargaining chip they have ever had; pussy. Perhaps it will force women to stop being such massive cunts and actually make themselves worth partnering with again
>>56973350
Those are male power fantasies
So do feminists and SJW's support prostitution and sex trafficking? With sex robots those industries would most likely crumble. Not to mention that lots of great technological innovations and standards stem from sexual exploits. This could be a good bridge gap between simple AI and smart AI that would benefit humanity as a whole. Sex robots are ultimately harmless. I bet they'd lower the STD rates in many countries.
>>56973315
The one thing that we're guaranteed to be useful for removed due to technology.
>>56972182
No one wants to fuck you anyways bitch , she might as well become a robot
>>56972888
Most women aren't sexy at any point in their lives, furthermore those that are lose their attractiveness much faster than men lose their sex drive, therefore, most men can't have sexy women.
On top of that, men want variety in their sex partners. You will get tired of any woman, no matter how sexy she is, within a few years.
Sluts and prostitutes are disgusting and disease-riddled. Women have been known to sabotage birth control for paternity benefits. False rape accusations are hard to disprove and are used as retribution for not pursuing relationships.
>what kind of a pathetic man has sex with a robot?
I'm going to predict: the vast majority who can afford to.
>>56973490
desu that's the idea around sexbots, women are so fucking dangerous these days, 1 misstep and you're life is fucked
>marrige
>"i wanna divorce"
>well shit gotta pay all your shit that YOU rightfully own and bought to her and give your items to her
>I don't wanna have sex - girl
>"You go girl! No man should pressure you into sex!"
>I don't wanna have sex - guy
>"LOL VIRGIN BET YOUR GAY!"
See my point? This will fix a lot of shit
>>56973524
And so this campaign is trying to give females power... why can't a man have power? What about the penis is so terrible, doc?
so how about a sex robot that also
>makes you breakfast
>talks to you about interesting topics and has good musical taste ie. an algorithm of what you like or might like bassically.
>cleans and makes you dinner for when you come home tired
>never complains, manipulates or has a stupid family that causes more trouble than being useful
how about that? sounds sweet doesnt it?
And how many vibrators do you own, Kathleen?
>>56973864
>Implying we won't perfect robots to do that some day
Back to tumblr.
>>56973864
Yes:
>makes you breakfast
>cleans and makes you dinner for when you come home tired
>never complains
No:
>talks
>>56973919
a collection. but she might enjoy getting fisted by other bull dykes too. sweet, tender, woman respecting, UP TO THE ELBOW VAGINAL FISTING.
>>56972024
i see nothing wrong with this
you faggots are already perverted enough
>>56974021
>No:
>>talks
why? ..if you gotta take her as a companion, she might as well talk, a smart robot with useful advice might top and make obsolete any woman. forever.
>>56972024
At least both me and feminists can agree that they're degenerate as fuck
>>56972573
>being so delusional you think this is a conspiracy
go to bed pervert
>putting your faith in big expensive hunks of metal instead of affordable VR waifus
Daily reminder that these people think only FEMALE sex-bots are bad and should be banned.... they don't have a problem with male sex-bots.
>>56973315
>being this perverted
why dont you just fuck your dog you nasty cunt. its basically the same level
>>56974202
>Women are over sexualized!
What about men, doc?
>blah blah, I like my dildos, so shut up and die white cis scum. The penis is oppressive, not the vagina! Submit!
Do you see what's wrong with this picture now?
>>56972024
>Dr Richardson believes humanoid sex robots reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of women
Being seen as a sexual being is "damaging", but it's all fine and dandy when they're your maids or building your iPhones, am I right doc?
>>56974021
I like talking though
>>56974405
why dont you just fuck your dog m8. its basically the same thing
>being this perverted
no wonder american women love black cock
>>56972024
But I mean, women will get male sex robots, so doesn't everyone win here?
>>56972888
>go out and get a real woman
Real women are shitty emotional trainwrecks that cannot form the biological bond necessary to have a lasting relationshit. Femenism has turned western women into nothing but a cock addicted hole by replacing traditional values with their own brand of moral relativism.
>>56972024
if you arent in complete agreeance with this feminist lady you are the problem
American men are already:
>creepy
>perverted
>pedophiles
>spineless
>weak
>cowardly
>feminine
>homosexual
>gender fluid
>fuck animals
>sniff their own ass holes
>fuck their cousins
>dont wipe their ass
>eat their own boogers
this list does not need to get any bigger
>>56974417
Hypocrisy. The liberals run on the stuff.
>BEING A PORN STAR IS LIBERATING!!!
>BUT SEX DOLLS ARE DEGRADING AND DAMAGING!!!!
like seriously??
>>56974568
And that's why I'm glad to live in Alaska, where the women are submissive and the men are Hetero
![85ff60e073c958f9325ab0e6fbba6051[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/XMDkgJL.jpg "85ff60e073c958f9325ab0e6fbba6051[1].jpg")
Will they look like this?
>>56974499
I don't own any, but if I wanted to, why should I be shamed for it because of my penis, yet a woman can own all the dildos in the world and she would probably be praised for not using a real man for sex.
I guess though, we're at fault for actually caring about what these ISIS-tier vaginas think.
>>56974338
>not having both for the ultimate VR sexbot experience
>>56972024
Why? It's not like they're trying to please anyone anyway.
>>56974668
fuck up pedo
>>56974647
I hope not, proportions look awful.
Perhaps we should man up and find a real woman like pic related. :^)
>>56974216
Well, it's going to be a problem to implement. A conversation partner needs to have a full general intelligence.
Cooking, cleaning, serving, and fucking can mostly just follow rules. Occasionally, you're going to need to deal with something yourself, when it's outside of its programming, but it could be useful.
A sexbot programmed to be chatty is going to end up sounding like Eliza. It might fool you for a few minutes at a time, but if you poke at it, it's going to land in uncanny valley creepiness when it tries to pretend to have a sophisticated intelligence but is just following rules.
>>56974752
ISIS-tier vagina detected.
Does the gif trigger you?
Eh, I'd never use one because attractive. But I'd love to see them become a reality to see all those feminist fucks BTFO when they lose their vagina privilege.
I mean, that's what she's really saying. She doesn't want to have to compete with a robot because she knows she'd lose.
>>56974074
Haven't you heard that its what's on the inside that counts? And with the way women act sometimes, you need to reach real deep in there to find the sweet and tender parts.
![1425103452141[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/wMPA5hV.jpg "1425103452141[1].jpg")
>those poll results
>>56972024
>very disturbing
And for billions of men, it's a wonderful and exciting possibility. We will see, which side wins, a handful of whiny, feminist ideologues or the combined vigour and ingenuity of men.
>>56975055
You mean like the lungs? They are soft. Unless she is a smoker ofcourse
>>56974948
Where's that from? I need this information strictly for scientific purposes
>>56974948
>Arguing with an Australian
You do know all they do is shitpost right?
>>56974948
>not being a pervert makes me a isis feminist
>posts hentai to prove it
like clockwork lads lmao. you're a disgusting perverted american piece of shit and people like you are ruining the white world. you are literally the cancer you spend your life on /pol/ talking about
>>56974533
Women lose actually, they need the emotional support. Something robots can't provide. Men need a warm body for pleasure, women need warm feelings.
That's why the women are getting uppity about this. They are going to lose a lot of power. When women get men sex robots, we men could care less. We will continue grilling, playing vidya, making money, making war, and being happy.
The women will have no emotional support and then get jealous of the men's sex dolls because they aren't getting any real attention.
>>56972352
>comrade sumo
kek
never change anon
> buy sexdoll once, set for life, never becomes old, never becomes ugly, never whines
> marry pic related, enjoy your hambeast after 15 years
>>56975238
then A.I will evolve so that bots can provide emotional need.
Men progress hardware, women progress software
>Men who only want sex get sexbots
>Men who want relationships and children pick up chicks
Isn't this a very possible outcome? Either way, feminists will probably not get what they want in the end.
>>56974919
>Well, it's going to be a problem to implement. A conversation partner needs to have a full general intelligence.
full nope. people are dumb. or at least, are more machiney that they are able to recognize.
look at these crude attempts like cleverbot or even the very google. or akinator, that genius that gets shit pretty fucking fast. you have to live with someone for a short time to lift with accuracy the patterns and main interest.
a chatty bot that algorithms the fuck out of your brain wont be a problem im sure. its already here.
>>56975328
She doesnt look great before either though
This is also a good reminder why you check out a chicks mom before you wife them
>>56975160
http://manyakisart.tumblr.com/
Enjoy, good sir.
>>56974533
Nope, it will be a fucking disaster for women.
First they'll lose all social power - if men can get sex on demand, they have no reason to listen to some shrieking whale.
Second, they'll lose financial support from men through marriage.
Third, they'll lose emotional/spousal support. Men can get by without a wife and use friends for social support. Women usually want a family and a nest, a child, and a husband. It's already difficult now, imagine how difficult will it be if sexbots become a reality. Many will literally become insane.
No sympathy from me. They wanted modernity, they wanted technology, they wanted progress, and well, this is the fucking endgame.
>>56975328
wow, what a difference!....i'd like to see more of these before/after aging pics for next marriage thread
>>56975181
I didn't, but thanks for that tip.
Milo wrote a lulzy piece about this
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/16/sexbots-why-women-should-panic/
>>56972820
This works until you realize the robotic Chads won't be giving her any money
>>56975373
I could see that women could fall in love with AI. I just don't know if it would last. The women would then turn those sexbots in to c.ucks. Then they would grow bored of them. The robots couldn't assert dominance because then that might lead to the whole end of humanity scenario.
So women get AI sexbots, make them beta servants, then get bored and find a new one?
The AI interaction with women is gonna be a shitshow. Plus what happens when they program them to assert dominance? (Ignoring any morals these things might come with) Will the women cry "My sexbot raped me!"?
Then the women turn to human males for help and we don't give a shit.
Women are interesting organisms.
>>56972024
>>56972182
It's always the ugly ones. It's like they're still holding out for that one-in-a-million chance someone actually wants to fuck them, and are terrified of losing that.
>>56974705
please be a shoop.
>>56976131
And those ugly ones are to dumb to realize that they could create a sex robot for themselves that looks like king chad with a customizable dick that has a ribbed dick with vibrating beads in it or something crazy
>>56976277
Well I do think, as others have said, "vagina privilege" is playing a part in this. The entire basis of male-and-female social interaction, the bedrock, is that the male wants to bang the female and the female wants to shack up with the male for security. Sex bots disrupt that balance.
>>56976423
It used to be different in the past though, vagina privilege is a modern idea.
I remember reading a lot of stuff on sexuality before the industrial revolution and men had dick privilege and women had to actually work to find men. Hopefully we return to that.
>>56976181
Unfortunately no
But hey it's impressive what our bodies can handle
>"reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of women."
She isn't wrong, but not in the ways she thinks she's right.
Men don't /want/ to be with women anymore because the deck is, and always has been, stacked against them. Men have only ever made money to give to women. The traditional and damaging stereotype of women is that they abuse and despise men for their own personal benefit. So when somebody creates a way for men to find sexual release that is a way out, away from women, it threatens women's power over men by giving men a way out from this social and systematic oppression. And those are words that, unlike everybody else, I don't use lightly. Men /are/ the oppressed class, and it's not like they've had a problem with doing things for women before. Men done things for women out of love. But now women are just taking the piss, and to say to any of them "look I don't really mind doing shit for you, just don't take the piss", they are told that they hate all women.
So feminists will protest against it. They'll call it woman hating, sad neckbeards who can't get a real women, etc. Every dirty trick, every smear campaign, every shaming tactic in the book. Because how dare a man even entertain the notion of not living his life to serve women.
It should have never come to this. Sex robots shouldn't have a need to exist, they shouldn't be a big deal. But here we are. As far as anybody is concerned, men aren't human beings, and that right there is the source of the problem.
Personally, I'm not in a position to afford one of these robots, and I think it's a little... out there. But if I had the money? You'd be damn sure I'd be considering one. Hell, I briefly had a gander at Real Dolls at one point.
It's the Calhoun experiment in action, people. The people buying those robots are the beautiful ones. Feminists are just in serious fucking denial that they're the ones causing the downfall of society. This is the grave they chose.
>>56972024
Who here /waifubot/
>>56976028
But it still ends in scientific advancement because I want to stick my dick in something.
An advancement in prosthetic, in entertainment and calculation, advanced A.I on space crafts exploring the stars.
"must have been gods plan, when he made boners stronger than man.'
I don't suggest you believe in god, but at least believe your erection can pierce the stars.
>>56976709
In the same way the cold war fueled advancement, so will man's quest for poon. It's beautiful.
Come on now, we all know that AI is hard and unconvincing. The sex "robots" will be remote-controlled over the internet with force-feedback VR interfaces. You're only going to be able to get your robot piloted if you take your turns riding cock.
Enjoy becoming a whore.
>>56976709
Beautiful man, beautiful.
>>56972024
Just wait until artificial wombs are perfected for human beings. The only women left with any value will be made of steel.
>>56976581
you should read the manipulated man
Why would they care, didn't they say earlier only pathetic lonely virgins would use them? I'm pretty sure they wouldn't give the guys they described the time of day anyway, so what gives?
>>56974499
>>56974568
>>56974752
>>56975185
Shhhh. We hear you little guy. Simmer down.
>>56972182
I'd rather fuck my blender.
>>56976538
I think that's a shoop.
I knew a girl that had to go be in the ICU for 3 weeks and eventually died from anorexia and she never looked like that.
>>56972182
Holy shit /pol/, stop being right.
>>56977162
There's a disease which causes you to not be able to deposit adipous tissue.
It might be that.
>>56972024
>has sex with gf
>stop raping me!
>starts building sexbot instead
>it degrades women!
She's only whining because sex is the only true leverage that women have over men. You take away our need to have sex with them and you're taking away the majority of their power. Of course she's complaining, where will women be if they can't manipulate men with their sexuality?
>>56974705
And...my spoopy pictures folder scores another hit.
Thank you, 4chin!
>>56972024
First comment:
>so the fembots want to outlaw the sexbots.
Kek.
>tfw feminists will ruin the waifu age
>>56972024
As if the white population birth rates weren't bad enough.
>>56977427
No amount of kicking and screaming will stop the waifu age.
>>56976581
god you faggots are pathetic
you are the degenerate
>>56977257
And really that's the root of the issue. Current feminism has poisoned the well. Men don't want to be with women anymore because of the chance of getting slapped with a rape charge. Feminism portrays women as blood-thirsty psychos out to destroy men, but then they get uppity when men try to find a way to opt out.
I miss ATHF... ;_;
>>56974401
>australlia
stfu
>>56974705
Her name is Nana Karagianni
>>56976581
> MGTOW talk right there.
the lack of true love, respect, loyalty, and companionship is the real downfall.
Sadly, If I look at it honestly, women's financial independence has been a big part of things falling apart. When women depended on men they could not run around without worrying.
With out a leash to keep 'em tied to the house, and men's sexual dependence on women; they really do have the upper hand. Plus, the liberalization and acceptance of women having sex with tons of partners. aka slut shaming became a thing.
No one wants to live their life for a slut. The value proposition for a woman being anything other then something you fuck or impregnate is no longer viable.
They really do have the upper hand.
>>56977641
this..
>>56974760
Weirdly enough I find it more fuckable than more human models I guess it's an uncanny valley thing.
>>56977661
mmm yeahhh that's the stuff
> can you feel my dick hit your liver n spleen girl?
>>56972352
>>56972182
>>56972024
>>56975328
American women age like milk. Why does everyone turn obese in there?
>>56975984
didn't read article nice use of fembots
>>56976028
>The robots couldn't assert dominance because then that might lead to the whole end of humanity scenario.
This... this is actually a real possibility.
>>56972024
>>56972182
Gee, I fucking wonder why people would want to make such a contraption...
>>56978243
Girlfriend's mom still looks good in her 40's. If I marry her she'll always look good.
>>56977999
Nice misunderstanding of "uncanny valley" desu
>>56977999
It makes me think of food processors when it looks like that.
>>56972352
We cant let them take our maid/waifu bots /pol/!
The reap kicker here is that there will be chad-bots and the feminists will say, "oh but we're just exploring ourselves and it's only right that we as rhe sexual oppressed gender, pleasure ourselves with something that can't oppress us and by you having a female sex robot is oppressive to all females.
>desperately trying to save her gender's failing sexual economy
Women will be useless by the end of the century.
>>56972024
The feminists have the right idea for once.
It's degenerate to fuck some bucket of bolts because you sperglords can't actually talk to a real woman.
In short, kill yourselves.
>>56978773
I don't think I need to question ghosts.
The only detractor is blueberries
>>56979051
Then why do they care?
>>56979051
Question is rather how those sperglords (including me) could even exist. What went wrong? Source is most likely the post 69s mentality and increasing amount single moms and missing father roles which will eventually fuck up boys and young men. They'll result in being whiny, beta and feminized, completely different from the behaviour women expect and wish.
In short, women dig their own grave. And it's hilarious to observe them doing so.
>>56972257
> They don't have on/off switch, Russian bro.
>>56973864
Heaven
>>56972024
>>56972182
Yeah, I'd rather fugg a robot
>>56972024
Good. The thought of all these disgusting beta white males (who are the root of all this mess) receiving some degree of happiness is revolting.
Everything that is wrong with society is the fault of BETA white males. They are the ones who let women vote, and they are the ones who let Jews and immigrants come into our countries to rule over us.
The last thing beta white males deserve is some sort of sexual release. If I had it my way I'd chemically castrate every last one of you somehow where you have the urge for sex, but no ability to achieve an orgasm. It's the punishment you deserve.
>>56979130
I know why they care. And tbqh I don't give a rat's circumcised penis about their reasoning.
>>56979051
>In short, kill yourselves.
This is what we'll do in the long run.
>>56979351
trying too hard/10
>>56979220
>how those sperglords (including me) could even exist
You got the gene that leads to Assburgers, dummy. That's how you become a sperglord.
I agree that women today are degenerate because of the 60's and feminism and bullshit like that.
>>56972024
>dem poll numbers
Bitchy incubators blown the fuck out.
>>56979351
yeah... when sarcasm gets that specific it gets really cringey.
It is almost like you just accidentally read a page from your diary aloud.
>>56974568
I'm a married alpha with lots of kids. I'd trade my wife in for a sexbot in .00001 seconds. I do love her but jesus christ I have needs.
>>56980089
how old are you that your needs are still that demanding.
are you addicted to porn? I would not be surprised if you are overestimating your biological need for sex and release.
>>56975185
>A country were men literally knocked up Abo's calling anyone else perverted
TOP KEK
>>56980089
38.
No I never look at porn to be honest. I've had a overloaded sex drive since I can ever remember, when I first saw a dirty magazine when I was like 4 or 5 I knew what I wanted.
I feel the hunger inside always and it's powerful.
Let's campaign to ban vibrators. They dehumanize men, and carry a connotation that we're nothing but walking pleasure machines.
>>56980507
checks out
>>56972024
If they ban sex dolls then they'll have to ban dildos. Which is the only dick feminazis are getting
>>56972024
They're just mad that they can be replaced for their only enjoyable trait and can't nag a guy after sex anymore.
>>56972024
>Men spend more of their time with sex dolls instead of wimmin
>The proportion of time men spend in a day oppressing and raping wimmin drops
>"Girl, I'm sorry for not spending time with you, have some money as compensation"
Isn't it beneficial?
>>56980764
Me looking at porn would be like piping in bbq and fried chicken smells to some jail where they only ate rice.
At least I recognize the danger.
The issue is, some women can ...just tell I'm a horrible fucking animal. Like we can smell it on each other or something. This leads to problems but I don't cheat ;)
>>56980089
> I'm a married alpha with lots of kids.
> married
> unsatisfied needs
> alpha
topkek
>Dr A. Mann believes vibrating dildos reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of men
Funny how these feminists dont have a problem with the male equivalents that have been used by women for decades
>>56972095
what makes you say that?
They should have made a point of only banning loli sex robots first, then moved it up to teen after a few years, then finally ban it all.
But trying to do way too much, way too quickly is the norm for the SJWs today.
>>56972182
>I'm gonna make fun of her appearance so she and her supporters can ignore my well-made arguments
>mfw the modern women are substituted for the male equivalent of a dildo
>>56972972
There is no need for robots, the dolls are good enough
>>56977427
well then
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3DU-7a8mP0&index=3&list=PLyr_eTQASjhSzsTCpiCLHi0BBb1tpcPpF
>>56979351
>keeps secrets
Who the fuck does NOT keep secrets? HUR HERE IS MY BANK LOGIN HAVE FUN
>>56972024
Those people are womenizing objects, not objectifying women.
I don't see her problem.
>>56981373
your infographic is a little old, bruv
purity crashes at 14 these days
>>56981631
They'd better not fucking touch my lolibots.
>>56982015
My dick is becoming engorged just looking at this. How much for one of these?
>>56982312
Don't worry, in thirty years you'll be able to assemble one from off-the-shelf parts or have one clandestinely shipped from Japan.
>>56973490
>Perhaps it will force women to stop being such massive cunts and actually make themselves worth partnering with again
IKR, talking to women already feels like talking to robots so no big deal.
This is an inevitability, yet unnecessary. Onahole+ VR will be just as effective
WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE
Indeed, it's better if we continue creating transgenderreversebithings with advanced chirurgical medicine and hormonal therapy.
>>56972024
i'd be fine with that, if they go down and admit that sex is the only thing women have to offer men
>>56981373
>with the male equivalents
What?
How is a vibrator anything more or less than the equivalent of a fleshlight?
Imagine getting a sexrobot with the anime skin of your waifu
>>56983496
Animeshit in real life would look horrible or out of place. You want VR/AR to make the surroundings fit with her
>>56972024
Cash machines reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of men.
Ban ATMS
>>56972820
>robotic Chad
impossible, women like Chad simply because other women already like him, a robot would kill the attraction even if he was 7 ft tall and with a 10/10 face and 10 inch dick
>>56984328
If there was only one robot chad they would all fight over him
>>56972024
>mfw feminazis want to ban sex robots, yet scientist have successfully genetically engineered sperm cells and no one wants to ban that...
>>56973716
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KGfp2aTnHs
This video is what a man has to go through just to not get his life fucked up even if the woman is the one in the wrong.
>>56979351
>men are the ones responsible for allowing women to do stupid shit!! :DD
no my little white knight beta friend, women are responsible for the shit they do.
>>56974568
>>56978773
this is uncanny valley. your picture is just a blue girl
>>56984849
And then more would be fabricated to sell more and women would lose attraction, its a losing war, really, you can't satisfy women, they are never satisfied.
>>56972024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6g0wN_oQCmA
>>56972024
Its not like dildos exist and do the same thing to man
Right
>>56985260
>16 minutes
god damn amerifriend, i'll come back after i watch it
>>56983015
Are you retarded?
>>56972962
how is it creepy? are women who buy and use vibrators/dildos creepy? if not then why is a man who uses something other than his hand to masturbate creepy?
>>56972257
they don't have a mute button unfortunately
>>56985986
>>56985260
Eh...i'm confused, what was the point of it?
I see stuff like sexbots getting banned here, but I'm not too concerned. I'm moving away in less than a year.
>>56981631
>cure paedophilia and prevent recurring sex offenses with a lolita bot
>wanting to ban this
>>56984960
Underrated post desu
>>56972024
I don't know what y'all have against women. Right now, my girlfriend is at work, while I sit at home on my ass and do freelance work a few hours a week. When she gets home, she'll make dinner. I already have a sexbot :)
If sexbots devalue pussy wouldn't a drug that lowers or temporarily cancels men's libido do the same? Because men with lowered libido wouldn't value pussy so much? (also meaning no more creepshots and less porn consumption)
Also if sexbots reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of women don't giant 10+ inch dildos do the same to men?
>>56981711
>her appearence doesn't tell us nothing about her psychiatric motives, she is a special and unique snowflake whose personality doesn't match her outside
Yeah...........NO
>>56973361
the problem is just about anything can be used as an insertable object
>>56972024
>United Kingdom
Get a life, bin that robo-wife m8.
>>56989125
>cure paedophilia
You can't "cure" something defined as sickness only by a temporary social norm.
>>56990043
Lowering libido would be emasculating, fucking a robot whenever you want would be empowering
>>56972505
>t. Institute
No joke this bitch sounds like a spokes"woman" for the Railroad from Fallout 4.
Those comments though
>>56982501
All you need to know is it's going to be either better or cheaper or both each new generation, we're gonna make it happen anon, it's gonna be great.
>>56972024
>Dr Richardson believes humanoid sex robots reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of women
kek so do prostitutes are they going to rally against those?
>>56972024
>putting creepy in a title
what a kek
literally whatever women don't like = creepy
>>56991793
Calling something "creepy" is one of the ways feminists get white knights in position.
Its the same as screaming"rape" and calling someone a loser, virgin etc.
It just keep the most pathetic men submissive
"oh, no! I must agree with them in this regard and fight against this thing or else they will think I am a virgin creep!!"
I think we're forgetting the main attraction wome have for men, the jealousy her friends will feel. You can't have this with a Chad bot.
>>56972024
>reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of women
You know who also does that?
Women themselves.
>>56972731
This tobehonest. My robowaifu was uploaded in a T-800 Nova Moscu Pattern killer bot frame. She went through mechanic therapy to become what she trully was.
>>56973864
A sex robot that drains your balls dry then does all of those things???
>>56988529
The point of it is that the man literally had to record EVERYTHING before he left to prove there was no damage. LITERALLY EVERYTHING.
>>56972182
>>56972626
Women don't want sex robots because it drives down demand for their pussies.
They want to drive the "cost" of pussy up, making it valuable again.
Simple economics.
The supply curve was damped in olden days, because women were good and chaste.
So men had to marry the pussy to get the pussy. The "price" was marriage.
Now, imagine how little valued pussy will be when millions of realistic sexbots flood the western market?
Will there be a shitstorm over this?
Because once women are irrelevant, feminism is reduced to being a joke.
>>56972024
>traditional and damaging
of course something traditional must be damaging and wrong
>>56985784
I love this girl
>>56995122
>Now, imagine how little valued humans will be when millions of realistic andro/gynoids flood the market?
>implying the common person will even have the means to afford a sexbot by the time robots are that realistic
>>56985260
He sure showed her.
>>56972024
They will probably save the world tbqh
>>56995258
If a man could get a Sashabot for around the price of a car it would be so much better than a biological wife or gf.
>>56972257
no mute button
>>56986799
Are you?
Try posting an argument.
A disembodied dick is more comparable to a disembodied vag than it is a fully automated doll.
I am bitter towards what women have become. But I know they're only like that because men are weak. And obviously because of jews. Fucking r2d2 won't give us what we truly desire - companionship. Robovags are basically just a powerful wank.
We just gotta be men.
And also gas the kikes.
>>56972024
It seems the cunts can smell competition from 20 years away, and are acting preemptively.
But nothing will stop us from having our own 10/10 Number Sixes that cook, clean, and pleasingly give us oral without ever getting fat or aging or divorcing.
Nothing.
>>56995839
Plus they get old and mean and vindictive and petty and drain all your time and all of your resources.
Sexbots are there when you want them to be there and recharging in a closet when you don't.
And they never have periods. Or explosive diarrhea.
And their vaginas always smell faintly of some delicate perfume.
And they are always randy for sex.
And they always keep themselves clean.
And they are never cross.
QED
Feminists will never let fembots happen, look how savagely they attack even video games with normal sexual content.
Any company or persons developing them will be the subject of targeted ridicule and harassment until they give up or convert.
>>56995720
>Sasha grey
Gross. And when a robot can convincingly replace a human and coata less than a middle of the line automobile is when 99% of the organic population is unemployed. No on will keep you around when you're just another mouth to feed. Good luck finding a warm bed let alone an expensive hole to stick your inferior penis into.
And, what about good healthy fetish bots.
For instance, the mom in Taboo?
>>56996121
>>56996121
Is this you, anon?
>Because you sound like her.
>the topic of this thread
Watch this
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z760XNy4VM
>>56996088
Why would they care? Even if somehow feminists harass sex shops into banning them, they are just gonna sell them online. Or otherwise they will just develop it elsewhere. Video games are dependent on publishers and stores. This is not the case here.
>>56996088
Waaaay too much demand for them, anon.
The feminists will whine and bitch and threaten to withhold sex.
But men will win this one.
>>56981711
>well-made arguments
Honestly, good bait til there.
>>56972024
>"humanoid sex robots reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of women."
Women reinforce traditional and damaging stereotypes of women.
>>56996424
this, it will be a trillion dollar industry
Birth rates need to go down. Proper sex bots will help that.
>>56972573
>>56972988
>>56973040
>>56973315
>>56973346
>>56973490
Does everyone forget that its just as easy to make a male sexbot? This doesn't solve anything. Men will mostly have female sexbots, and women will probably have male sexbots.
>>56972820
This guy gets it.
>>56985260
Not REKT REKT REKTangle SHREKT Total REKTall The Lord of the REKT The Good, the Bad, and the REKT LawREKT of Arabia Tyrannosaurus REKT.
>>56972988
god that sounds amazing, can you imagine your own harem of sex bots customized to look exactly like you want? And no niggers and jews on top of that!?
>>56973488
>malfunction! MALFUNCTION!
>DOES NOT COMPUTE!
>SELF DESTRUCT
>SELF DESTRUCT
>>56972182
She just needs a sex robot to relieve her stress. Then she'd be less bitchy.
>>56996837
yeah beacuse only a robot would have sex with her
>>56996783
>Does everyone forget that its just as easy to make a male sexbot?
it's a LOT easier to make a male sexbot.
Take one of those Real Dolls and stick a dildo on it. Done.
A female sexbot has to have the right texture and warmth and moisture to work well, and that's a bit more difficult.
>>56996783
I think the ai for chadbots will have to be a little more refined to prevent injury so it might be a little harder.
And I don't think everybody is forgetting about chadbots they just wont make take as much power away from men as waifubots will take from women.
Why are WOMEN always so concerned with where MEN put their penises??
OUR BODY OUR CHOICE
>>56972182
