Hey, NATO friends.
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: Hey, NATO friends.
How do you feel that if russia attacks turkey we will be forced to defend turkroaches?
>implying we won't bretray NATO just like we did with the Triple Alliance
>>56795940
You're not defending the if Russia attacks a NATO country you are not defending that country, you are defending the West. Its about NATO, not about the Turks.
>he fell for the NATO scheme
>>56795940
>He thinks the eternal Anglo will honour our agreements
>>56795940
>anyone will defend turdkey
I would 4th crusade turkey.
>>56796050
Die in a fire faggot, death to nato death to the "west" I am not the "west" I am American.
>Greece not honoring contracts
typical, really
>>56795940
Nothing really changes.
>>56796160
you guys started NATO ?!?!??! WTF
>>56796199
>d
>contracts
>meaning more than blood and history
>>56795940
shut up Eurocück, it's not like you'd be contributing anything.
You're just a freeloader with no sense of honor and no drive to uphold standards.
>>56796239
>you guys
>some globalist kikes using the U.S for their own purposes
>>56796199
>hey greece why don't you attack russia for turkey that occupied you for 400 years.
>>56795940
Nobody in NATO is going to help the turks. Agreements don't mean shit, see: all of past history.
>>56795940
The same way I felt about turkey letting IS train and smuggle in their east when we turned a blind eye, to spite Assad. Absolutely disgusted.
>>56796291
>Russia was one of the nations responsible for liberating Greece from Turkish rule
>Your leaders have committed you to dying to save Turkey from Russia
>>56795940
I would immensely enjoy the shitposting on 4chan and feel very sorry for Americans at the same time.
Even then though there would never be a full scale war between the two, the US would just focus on containing the Russians and keeping them away from Turkey I would imagine. Still the whole thing is a fantasy, Putin isn't stupid enough to overstep his mark.
>>56795940
Feels terrible. Turks are nothing more than the sons of apes and pigs
Pic related
>>56796261
>being this much of a meme American
>>56796384
> Uk and BaguetteLand responsible for Ottoman occupation of the Balkans lasting so long
should I be fighting the UK and France because of that ?
>>56796291
Same Turkey that violated Greek airspace 2,440+ times this year without any retaliation.
Turk is scum. If war breaks out (it won't), I'm going to the fatherland, Hayastan, and fighting with the ruskies
>>56796491
it goes against my religion to fight for turks, I am an urbanite catholic.
>>56795940
Attack Turkey from the west and split the land with Russia. Take back Constantinople.
>>56796523
Sure, if you want to lose again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Neuilly-sur-Seine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armistice_of_Salonica
>>56795940
>forced
this is not how Europe works
>>56796291
>muh contstantinople
Wow, no wonder your country's a failure. Every one of you is hung-up on something that happened 400 fucking years ago. No greater butthurt was ever inflicted on man. You guys couldn't even hold on to it when you had your chance after WWI. Get over it.
>>56796540
I'll pay to send you and your friends over now. One way ticket. :^)
>>56796684
why quote the treaties from WW1. That has nothing to do with the UK and France protecting the Ottomans because of trade reasons.
>>56796885
Why not?
>>56795940
nato is a defensive pact only
turkey has not followed nato roe and will not be able to incite article 5, they are an aggressor
obongo and trudeau are all talk, they would not be obligated to actually back up turkey if it came down to it
>>56796754
>hey greece, why don't you get over the genocides the turks done to you? Why can't you just defend turkroaches from the guys that played a key role on liberating your nation?
Why do you want me to be a huge cu.ck like you?
>>56797022
Well, you can say that if Russia attacked them over a rather small event as what happened, then yes, NATO will step in.
>>56797198
shooting down an aircraft is an act of war if russia chose to act on it nato would not legally be obligated to back up turkey
nato is defensive only, not for shitty little t*rks to try to piss off stronger countries and then run and hide between americas legs
usa wants to deny russian influence but youre delusional ifyou think theyd go beyond shitty proxy warfare, if it came down to it usa would happily watch t*rks get fried by a nuke over going to war with russia
>>56797052
If I were to cite the role the Russians played in contributing to your defeat 100 years later, you would turn solvent. Do you wish to go down that rabbit hole, my obligation-challenged friend?
>>56797839
>Jewish-backed bolsheviks
>Russians
>>56798187
>italy
You guys helped too! The modern republic of Turkey is eternally grateful for your crucial material and logistical support in its infancy.
