...would you join it?
>>56791183
Sure, why not.
>>56791183
I forgot what the difference was between nazism and fascism..
>>56791183
Yes I want a fancy uniform.
>>56791183
Yes
t. guy from a family who fought for fascism
No fascists are leftists and revolutions are for leftards.
>>56791183
Yes.
>>56791183
Of course.
>>56791183
no doubt, im fuckin ready
Harper was borderline fascist. Gonna miss his Canada desu. I love being sold to and bought by chinks
>>56791183
Fascism is complete garbage when the rulers are shit.
But in the case that they're not shit, sign me up.
>>56791183
No. Fascists and socialists are two sides of the same coin and contradict what it truly means to be a free man.
Hell, even democracy contradicts what it means to truly be free. That's why we should have never gave universal suffrage to everyone.
>>56791601
>le I support le freedom meme
>still not wanting universal suffrage
Freedom is overrated anyway. Look at where freedom brought us
>>56791506
Canada is so fucked I actually moved back to Serbia. Fuck off with your faggots and hijab wearing mudslimes. $600k for a shithouse? Lol fuck you srsly
>>56791369
This. Supporting fascism is supporting degeneration.
>>56791183
yes, fuck Renzi
yes
>>56791685
Universal suffrage is the reason we are in this fucked up mess anyways in the world.
Here is a quote from Frédéric Bastiat in 1850.
>I know what might be said in answer to this; what the objections might be. But this is not the place to exhaust a controversy of this nature. I wish merely to observe here that this controversy over universal suffrage (as well as most other political questions) which agitates, excites, and overthrows nations, would lose nearly all of its importance if the law had always been what it ought to be. In fact, if law were restricted to protecting all persons, all liberties, and all properties; if law were nothing more than the organized combination of the individual's right to self defense; if law were the obstacle, the check, the punisher of all oppression and plunder — is it likely that we citizens would then argue much about the extent of the franchise?
>Under these circumstances, is it likely that the extent of the right to vote would endanger that supreme good, the public peace? Is it likely that the excluded classes would refuse to peaceably await the coming of their right to vote? Is it likely that those who had the right to vote would jealously defend their privilege? If the law were confined to its proper functions, everyone's interest in the law would be the same. Is it not clear that, under these circumstances, those who voted could not inconvenience those who did not vote?
He's right. If the law functioned like it ought to, there would be no need for universal suffrage.
indeed
>>56791787
>Canada is so fucked I actually moved back to Serbia
That fucking bad, huh?
>>56791183
If it was a military led coup? Yes.
If it was some faggots thinking they can overthrow my state from some bar? No.
>>56791242
>Giving me over to Bernie Sanders' people
I-I can learn to accept the socialism I guess.
Staten Island and Long Island RINOs can suck it, though.
>>56791317
>>56791348
Your flags are like magnets.
NO
MY HEART IS STILL TRUE FOR MY VOJVODA UNCLE DRAZA
>>56791787
>moved back to Serbia
Hahahhaahahhahaha
>>56791183
In a heartbeat. A european fascist federation of city states would be amazing
