>2015
>Being a monogamy kek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8SOQEitsJI
Degeneracy
>>56776315
Monogamy has been an utter failure just look at the divorce rates if you think otherwise.
Only beta males and Christians (which tend to go hand in hand) believe in strong monogamy in 2015.
>>56776246
Any self-respecting male living in the west already knows not to get married
>>56776436
This, marriage in the USA is completely fucked
>>56776246
>Only beta males and Christians (which tend to go hand in hand
>>56776246
Consensual relationships have failed. Let's rethink our opinions on slave harems.
>>56776246
>Trusting gays on monogamy
Are you serious?
honest-to-god, i can't imagine myself cheating. or ever having the desire to.
i just want one single partner and soul mate.
but apparently only men are wired for monogamy. women crave novelty and will always want new penises.
>>56776246
Wow way to not make faggots look like a bunch of sick fucks trying to have sex with anything
>>56776246
One woman is already a decent risk, why the fuck would you chance yourself by marrying more unless you follow a religion like Islam?
Dan Savage is a faggot though, why would you take his advice on heterosexual relationships? I suspect he has AIDs as well. His face looks haggard.
>>56776392
Funny because America has the most sexual intercourses and yet the marriages are so shit.
I don't think it's the lack of sex that's hurting marriages.
>>56776597
Nah, men instinctively want to have as many sexual partners as possible, as well. But, unlike women, we are more likely to be socialized to defer gratification and work towards long-term goals which isn't just better for us personally, but for society at large.
Unfortunately, socialist policies have been degrading this quality over time and unless those still holding these values secede from the r-selected garbage, society will decay more and more.
>>56776392
>utter failure
It worked for thousands of years until The Juice started systematically destroying it in the 50s
>>56776246
he's right tbhlad
monogamy is some silly shit, especially if you're bi and want to fuck men and women.
>>56776788
If anything society is getting more open and free. Open relationships will be the norm in the future.
>>56776871
Socializing the cost of degenerate behaviour is not freedom.
Women have more hormonal and mental instability than ever before.
Not only do most diagnosable mental heath issues have substantially higher rates of occurrence in women, comorbidity of multiple disorders is substantially higher in women (as per the American DSM-V).
This, coupled with the societal pressures that you'll see Tumblrina write about, leads to women having absolutely no idea how to live a stable, peaceful, patient life. It leads to elevated self worth and the expectation that at every single second, women should be entertained and treated like royalty.
The SJW crowd will read that paragraph and think I'm a misogynist. Quite the opposite. I'm not saying women shouldn't be treated with respect, I'm saying that there is neural chemistry that is simply off in 2015, which leads to unhappiness.
It causes women to get bored easily and to find problems where there otherwise are none. While this inherently wouldn't make women want to cheat or have sex with strangers, other confounding variables push the fairer sex into this mindset. They can't help themselves. These women honestly believe that by following their vagina around and caving into serotonin highs, they will find a lifelong happiness....until the next hormonal dip.
So what can you do, /pol/? The answer is to stop caring so much. Get married, date, be a NEET, whatever you want - but just always be in control of your own situation so that when the inevitable happens, you aren't hurt or surprised.
Source: B.S. in Applied Neural Chemistry, currently a Psy. D. candidate. (Spending the holidays in Germany with family, if the flag on my post makes you skeptic)
>>56776990
It is freedom because it means we stop hating human nature. Would you prefer having more divorces and failed relationships?
I can't even get one person to fuck me and these cunts are crying about monogamy being too restrictive
>>56776246
>men used to have whores and concubines, they weren't monogamous until just a short while ago!
such fuckin bullshit. just like any other degenerate faggot, this fool takes his examples from other degenerate faggots, like the aristocracy who actually did what he was saying.
But your average peasant farmer or craftsman literally had no time to fuck on the side and honestly wasn't this uncontrollably horny asshole that this guy is painting men out to be.
Fuck this guy, he looks like a bored person who gets off on sex because his life is relatively empty.
The real problem is that we don't stone people for breaking the rules any more.
>>56777194
Right, the status quo is the only other option. If you actually care about reducing divorces and failed relationships, you might want to listen to some more varied opinions on how we got to where we are at.
>>56777419
No, it's that we don't let people deal with the natural consequences of their actions on their own. There is no need to actively punish people for degenerate behavior, just stop subsidizing them.
People don´t have the patience to go through tough times; let´s just divorce. They fail to realize that life is not happy all the time and search for better. Eternal search for better partner, for better sex and expecting that you will be now happier than before. If you don´t feel happier, start it all over again. Never mind how the kids feel, it´s ME who deserves better.
>>56777579
Having the state as a backup plan certainly helps.
Why would you ever listen to a literal fag so huge of a liberal faggot that his STDs are the least of his problems?
This is the same fudgepacker who put forward his "relationship" when arguing with conservatives now proving that he was as full of shit then as he is now.
More than a bit of his writing honestly makes the man come off as mentally ill.
>men used to have whores and concubines, they weren't monogamous until just a short while ago!
As for this?
The oldest laws written down, in Babylonia and Assyria, made it very cleary that monogamy was the law and that no man could take another wife unless the woman he married was barren (i.e. sterile).
Degenerate whites and their insane divorce rates. How's gender equality doing for you cunts? Thank god for Confucianist patriarchial society.
>>56778472
>oldest laws
>monogamy was the law
That's because it was the same story then as it is today: Large families are a threat to the state.
Now, this fucking faggot in the OPs video isn't talking about Polygamy.
THAT FAGGOT IS TALKING ABOUT POLYAMORY, WHICH IS NOTHING MORE THAN SEXUAL HEDONISM.
However, ACTUAL polygamy is NOT degenerate, and for men is the natural state of being. A superior man being in possession (and yes, it is possession) of multiple wives creates large, loyal, cohesive families.
Inferior men are incapable of selecting and holding multiple wives, and thus polygamy is also de facto extremely eugenic. Polygamous superior men have the material resources and physical qualities necessary to court and breed with superior females, leading to large families of eugenically selected offspring.
This is ALWAYS a threat to the status quo, which is why States have classically forbade polygamy for the masses. This was the entire reason the USA banned polygamy in the first place, because the Mormons had grown SO LARGE, SO QUICKLY that they were almost capable of secession posed a direct and credible threat to the existence of the US Government in the Western territories.
Polygamy will never be a popular notion on /pol/ because it's full of r9k betafaggots with a right wing bend who dream of one day having a wife.
But go ahead and confuse polygamy with degenerate polyamory to make yourselves feel better about your dim prospects.
