Should women be in combat?
>>56739402
yes but only as healers and support
>>56739402
what a qt
>>56739504
what about snipers?
Everything I have heard from actual soldiers says no. They are emotional, aren't as physically strong or capable, and can't take as much stress.
But apparently it is sexist to say a woman can't do what a man can do even when it seems evident they literally cannot. Obama shouldn't be allowed to make these decisions from his comfy little office, meanwhile soldiers get fucked over by having a woman who turns out to be more of a detriment than an asset.
>>56739643
He already said support.
>>56739402
Fuuuuuuuuuuck no
Im in the army and all the women I've met are little bitch-tier, they whine and moan the most, they also get "injured" the most, I wouldn't want any of those fucks with me in combat
>>56739504
that's fine can't win without healers
of course not
what you think going to happen when someone gets injured or if they get captured?
>>56739402
We should prepare them in reserves, but not forthright.
>>56739402
no.
>>56739402
It doesn't matter in the end. Any military that puts women in combat will eventually lose to one that does not.
>>56739677
You want a solution to this problem? If you're male, don't sign up for the military.
There, I just solved that huge issue. You'll save yourself the headache and the world will breathe easier not having you faggots running around playing the Good Cop.
>>56739504
>healers
man this ain't no worlda wor craft
>>56739402
Modern day front line infantry need to carry more into battle than medieval knights. Women shouldn't do it until we have reliable exoskeletons.
As pilots, drivers, support, vehicle crews? Sure.
Yes, in separate divisions.
>>56739848
Tell that to the Jews.
>>56739700
>playing sniper support
>>56739402
Would you trust a 5'5 150lbs woman to carry your 6'2 220 lbs injured ass in the field of battle?
>>56739853
>serb still buttblasted from the 90's
Only as police officers so they can feel up and beat female criminals without rape accusations.
>>56739402
a buddy of mine came back from boot camp recently and he was very adamant that the woman should be kicked out of the army. apparently they do not do half of the drills and keep getting "injured from fucking bullshit"
>>56739945
>relying on woman to entry frag
>>56739402
yes, we need to rape
>>56739930
>third world 'armies'
>insurgencies
>military
Yeah no, I agree with my fellow burger on that one.
>>56739930
Okay
>>56740003
Careful with the word "buttblasted" there, Sanchez. It has connotations I'm not certain you're aware of.
>>56739402
To those who are saying no, have you considered gender-segregated units? They're working fine for the kurds
>>56739402
Nah, unless the women volunteer for it then they have noone but themselves to blame if they die.
Once women become equal combatants as males, than you have to draft or conscript women, and nobody is going to stomach a war when their daughters are butchered on the frontlines line white men are today.
Since war is a useful function of society, albiet a function females are ill suited for, I say no.
For infantry, women should be combat trained (yes all women) but not be in front line units. If the shit ever REALLY hits the fan, we'll need every finger on the trigger that we can muster. Which is why combat readiness for all military personnel is essential
I make an exception for woman that can qualify for flight duty (helo or fixed wing). If they can qualify to operate, they can fight.
>>56739402
>we have to storm the building NOW
>but I have my period. Why don't you ever take the time to talk to me anymore, I want to know right now mister.
Fuck it I'd join the enemy
>>56739402
No.
>>56739862
>his Nation's Military doesn't have healers
>>56740253
>gender segregated
Not on the front m80
>>56740217
try not to take my post too seriously
>>56739930
>will eventually lose
>eventually
It will happen, anon.
>>56739402
Why not, they are equal to men after all.
>>56739402
IS THAT SHIREEN BARATHEON
AZOR AHAI CONFIRMED!?
>>56739402
If they are qualified there should be no gender barriers. However it's retarded to lower standards to accommodate females. Also don't let them be above the dehumanizing shit that everyone else has to go through.
>implying any of you could be a woman in combat
Pic related would be the only possible outcome.
>>56739402
China has the right idea regarding this, conscript women as well but but them in their own units separate from male ones. Biggest problems with females in service comes from men and women interacting.
>>56740605
This is /pol/, I don't take anything too seriously. Just 30 minutes of shitposting before bed.
>>56740272
See, this would feel nice, but there's a reason we're so protective of our women - most of the men in the tribe die, the few remaining can still repopulate with the remaining women.
Most of the women die, well...that's a whole nother story.
>>56740574
Yu-uh. This ain't ww1. War is fast now, units move all over the place and there really isn't a front because trenches and minefields will get bombed to shit
>>56739853
Or, if you want an effective military, only have males. An all female military would be a disaster. I welcome any country to try it.
>>56739402
sure, they're the spoils of war anyway. might as well have them on the spot to service men whenever they're wanted
>>56739958
What if she was 6' 200, herself?
If physically more fit to do the job, do you think a woman would be able to?
>>56740871
Jesus H Christ! I'd surrender without a fight! Well played, China, well played.
>>56740871
I want to be raped by a division of chink qts
>>56739402
Why is it that modern depictions of Vikings and Germanic tribes involve such shitty looking clothes? Fashion was a thing back then. Soldiers didn't wear shitty leather drapes cut different legnths with holes all through them.
>>56740952
I'm not saying it's a problem, I'm saying that the Kurds actually integrate the units very well. The only real segregation is sleeping quarters and lavatories.
>>56739402
Strong Soviet women: Yes
All other women: no
They should train women in espionage and assassination. Female soldiers are worthless.
>>56740871
I love when Asians say "We don't all look the same!". Like excuse me, yeah you fucking do, it looks like a clone army.
>>56739930
Women in the IDF are propaganda. Those serving their mandatory terms are not usually the ones actually engaging in combat.
>>56740871
>tfw no qt asian soldier girl to brutally beat and rape you before throwing you in a reeducation camp
I dunno. Can you eat a sand which and fire a rifle at the same time.?
>>56739402
Absolutely barbaric
>>56740986
The military is fucking filled to the brim of non-combat roles.
Many soldiers never go beyond basic guard duty which is fine for women.
>>56741003
In the civilian world I'm good with any woman passing the same physical that a man can. I knew a few women that qualified for a FD that I volunteered with, they weren't that big but they would kick the shit out of most of the beta fags that post here. One of them posted the best time in our gear sprints so I never had a doubt about their readiness. But women like that are a rare breed, my take is that you don't change the metrics for them to pass for their sex.
If she cant make FD then she might qualify for PM. Either way I commend a woman for putting in the work, wish there was more like them.
>>56739865
>As pilots, drivers, support, vehicle crews?
have you seen women drive under stress?
>>56739402
Is that Le Cut Inside Man?
No, women cry at videos of puppies.
They are not mentally stable enough for combat.
Not to mention they are weak as hell, can they even lift a rifle?
>>56739402
>Implying 21st warfare is about physical strenght
Meh, a woman can fire a rifle, can't she? She can pilot a drone, can't she? I really don't care what they do in the barracks as long as they do their job.
With the
>muh equality.
Yes they should be drafted if need be and should be sent in as cannon fodder, also should be used as stress relievers for the men.
>>56739402
>Should women be in combat
Well, since combat is the most bloody brutal base and masculine/testosterone feral activity imaginable. I think it would be nice to make the rape-able pussy not far from the battlefield. It's just more convenient for everyone that way.
Generally no, maybe on desperate about to be genocided situations.
>>56739643
Snipers are the worst cowards.
>>56741809
She can lug 100+ pounds of gear, can't she? She can carry a 6'4'' comrade (in the same gear) out of harm's way, can't she?
That being said, I think women should be allowed into combat if they can pass their physical fitness tests and keep up with the men. A single instance of lowered standards for a female is unacceptable, though.
There are plenty of roles that could be good for women (or at least in a physical sense).
Snipers, pilots, medics, logisticians, cooks, espionage etc.
And there are some roles that should be avoided at all costs by them, like infantry and tank crews.
>>56741072
Blame "fantasy" things that try to make everything "grimdark" and mean-looking.
>>56739579
it´s Stannis´s daughter.
>>56739853
>If you're male, don't sign up for the military.
If you're male, you don't have a choice. In the states, neglecting to register with selective service is illegal and you will be jailed, and other countries have outright mandatory enlistment.
How does it feel to know you can be forced into war against your will at the whim of your owners?
>>56739402
they should be trained to know how to fight if the home front is under attack
>>56740871
Are Chinks cuter than Japs?
>>56742066
I like the way you think.
>>56742556
That's ironic of you to say Switzerland
>>56740455
Are there any sources that back up those claims? I've heard the same and am inclined to believe it, but can't without evidence.
>>56741192
when there's hundreds of millions of them your bound to get some similarities
>>56739402
Not every man is fit for combat.
Why would every woman be unfit for combat?
If they are not coddled or suppressed women can be fine warriors.
>>56743910
>If they are not coddled or suppressed women can be fine warriors.
AMAZING.
CAN YOU GUESS WHERE IT ALL FALLS APART?
>>56741487
Anything a wimmn can do a man can do better
>>56739862
>what is a medic
Fuck off kike
The average woman is not fit for combat, but the average man is.
I am fine with women as soldiers as long as they fucking meet the requirements. If a woman can run around with the same backpack as her male squad member without problems, fine.
>>56744207
do females shit on the streets too?
>>56744308
India already BTFO.
Should women be in combat? No
Should I be in combat? No
Should you be combat? No
>>56739402
Celtic women were allowed to be soldiers and nobody cared.
>>56739402
Snipers, nurses, basically anything that doesn't require other people to depend upon them physically too much. They shouldn't hold high-importance, high-stress positions due to their tendency to break under pressure. They can be useful, but ultimately they will need to be placed in specialized roles.
>>56740871
Women work worse with each other than with men. Not saying they should be paired with men, they shouldn't be in large units at all.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html
Also, here are some Chinese policewomen fighting like bitches.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZ4o6eWA27U
>>56741809
>Has never heard of the buddy system
Damn shame.
>>56744359
How does Mongolian semen taste?
>>56739862
god damn jew
>>56744537
>Snipers, nurses, basically anything that doesn't require other people to depend upon them physically too much
>Snipers
>anything that doesn't require other people to depend upon them physically too much
kek
>>56744805
Designated
>>56739862
>>56744937
Shitting
>>56744805
P O O
O
O
>>56744817
It works, for some reason.
>>56740871
death by snu snu
>>56739402
>Should women be in combat?
Only if supper's not ready on time.
>>56740455
>>56743825
Nope. This response basically refutes it point for point
http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/local/military/article31610657.html
>>56739402
Only if it takes place in the kitchen
>>56740683
SOMEONE ANSWER THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>56739643
>>56739700
>>56740053
women actually have worse aim than men
sniper would not be a fitting role my family
>>56740683
>>56745172
Yes according to Spain >>56743175
>>56745101
underrated post
>>56740879
Yeah, I figure people will be accepting of doctrine saying men and women are equal as soldiers, right until women come home en masse as bodybags or counted into mass-graves.
However people think society is progressive, wait and see when their mothers and sisters and daughters are killed overseas and dumped into a mass grave. A best case scenario if we went to war with Russia or China who kinda respect the law of war,
Realistically, more like raped and butchered to death like with our enemies in the middle east.
Either the US will have been severely brainwashed or they'd reject the idea of their daughters comping home in the form of an empty envelope and a sorry note from uncle sam.
>>56739862
Yeah, your military probably doesn't have them. You save shekels on medical supplies. Hell, ever wonder about that bullet hole in your uniform?
>>56745327
The one who's meant to be covered in Greyscale and incredibly sickly?
Fuck I hate this shit show so badly.
>>56739945
>implying boots orb of venom sniper with shrapnel lVl 1 can't roam
>>56745593
Yes.
OP's pick probably isn't from GoT, she died burned last season I think.
>>56739643
Have you ever seen a girl shoot? They are fucking terrible. Men are much better shooters. Military, Professionally, at every level. For every 100 top level shooters for men, there is probably only 1-3 women that can MAYBE compete. Being a sniper is very intense. Lots of on the spot math and corrections for every little detail. Its not just putting a dot on a target and fulling the trigger.
>>56744471
But I love combat and violence and I'm also really good at it.
Why should'nt I go into combat? It's my place in society,.
she looks like she could kick his ass...
>>56745885
You're aware that some of the most decorated and deadly snipers in history were Soviet women fighting Nazis, right?
>>56739402
Look, if you have the luxury of sending your women into war rather than having them stay home and work and have children to fill the gap that the casualties of war will leave in the economy, you should really reconsider the nessesity of that war.
>>56745012
Then why do you swallow?
>>56739402
Hell no.
But of course feminist cunts have to ruin everything. If I ever get drafted, I'm joining the enemy. Though, they'd probably have enough sense not to let women in their army.
Can't wait to hear hear the cries of "muh misogyny" as they're being shot at or raped in a POW camp.
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2015/10/12/women-likely-have-register-draft-army-secretary-says.html
There are plenty of societies in human history that have had female warriors.
They no longer exist for a reason.
No.
If females would make your military better at killing, it would have been done by now. The fact that it hasn't is proof it's a stupid idea.
>>56747573
>that pic
...and that's when the equality crowd suddenly stops.
>I HAVE TO REGISTER TO FIGHT AND DIE ON FOREIGN SOIL FOR A CAUSE I MAY NOT BELIEVE IN?? THATS SO FUCKING MYSOGINISTIC!
>Men have had to for nearly a century.
>MUH SOGGY KNEES. STOP RAPING ME WITH YOUR DEMANDS
>>56747573
most of them will get preggers and get shipped back.
now, if they required deployed women to be on birth control, that's when you'd see a shitstorm.
As combat medics sure.
Surprised no one here has mentioned all the drama that is caused when you integrate men and women in a working enviroment. There's a reason some businesses don't allpw men and women in the offices to interact. They turn men against each other.
>>56747573
>>56739402
Should women be in combat....
Humans if they so wish to fight should be allowed to fight for their cause...
However she must take into account all her differences and shor comings to supercede them
>boobs
>periods/on field hygene
>>56745593
>>56745833
>>56739402
NO.
Body and mind are far weaker than men.
>>56740792
The problem is men's built in instinct to want to protect women. I suppose you could have an army of degenerate genetically broken fags and women.
>>56740871
You wot m8?
>>56743688
how is that even a valid question?
>no
>>56744805
P o o
o
o
>>56749309
Fuck the show. I need another book.
>>56739402
No, but they should be well trained in combat as a measure of last resort.
>>56750655
Cheers. The winds of winter will be out in like 20 fucking years
>>56750765
I'm still undecided whether I should carry on watching the show or go full hermit to avoid spoilers whilst waiting for the book.
>>56739677
It's a nasty cycle. The tempering needed comes from a cycle of experience and parenting passed down through the ages and ingrained into our social environment.
That is, women don't make as good soldiers as men because we haven't let them be soldiers. We've had women succeed at Ranger school without altering the requirements. If that isn't stress-testing women for combat situations, nothing is- and we already have women in combat zones as it is, fighting as needed.
If they meet the physical requirements, there is no fucking reason not to allow it. The mental adjustments will only come as we get women into warfare at the same levels men are.
>>56750855
I'm watching it, there's no way that fat fuck is going to get the book out before the show airs and I'm not waiting.
He's probably already given up anyway. LOL U ALREADY HAVE AN ENDING NO NEED FOR ME TO WRITE ANY MORE
>>56750605
So you've tasted poo?
>>56752219
You are fighting back... I give you that, however..... Poo in loo
