Yes or No?
>>56732637
yes, it's very safe in none earthquake regiongs and when your neighbors dont hate you.
>>56732637
Yes, we can use the nuclear energy to create eco friendly consentation camps.
>>56732637
Next logical step of Humanity.
Maybe?
>>56732637
yes
![LFTR[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ndxsYbL.jpg "LFTR[1].jpg")
>>56732637
gibs LFTR!
>>56732637
Yes. The rewards are Greater Than the potential Risks.
>>56732637
Energy in its purest form
>>56732637
I vote for thorium fluoride
>>56732637
Yes.
>>56732637
yes
We should have built our own nuclear plants 15 fucking years ago
But clearly the answer is more wind turbines
>>56732637
The only reason why people say no is because of lack of knowledge.
>>56732729
It would have been reasonably safe at Fukushima too, except that they hadn't updated the reactor since the 70s and they weren't maintaining any of the backup systems. Japanese power companies are kind of notorious for being shitty.
>>56733084
>thorium
Buzzword. It's still not ready for production applications.
1000 times yes
Yes. Any 4th generation reactor
Yes if there is more regulation. Maybe NATO can do something useful and fill this void.
>>56732637
We'll be moving to fusion by the next century if Lockheed-Martin isn't bullshitting everyone.
>>56732637
Yes it is safe and clean.
>>56732637
Watt for Watt the safest source of energy in the world.
>>56732637
I'm not mentally disabled so I say no.
>>56732637
It's ecologically the safest power on the market. Costwise it's also cheaper than the majority of other energy sources on the market. A jumpstart in nuclear energy could also potentially push research forward with more modern tech. It's win-win.
>inb4 some eurokek tries to talk shit with wind power
Not even close to being cost efficient or ecologically sound.
>>56732637
I'm not a mentally challenged greentard and/or 12 year old girl so I say yes.
>>56733355
You fucking watt?
>>56733386
Could you provide some more arguments. I'm actually interested in hearing a different opinion
I worked in the industry from 2002-2009, then again from 2012-2014. Security at most sites is a borderline joke. Fix that then yes. Operationally speaking they're run by a myriad of procedures that make them the safest facilities in the world and are a powerful source of fairly clean energy. Once we figure out what to do with the ever increasing stockpile of spent fuel they will be even better.
Of course yes. But not for Ukraine and Japan, they are not worthy.
>>56732637
Yes
But I'm biased, because I'm a nuclear engineer and I like being employed
>>56732637
Best power source we have to date. Scare tactics by big oil made it a boogeyman unfortunately.
no thanks
>>56733528
What if Isis invades your nuclear reactors, France? With a large enough force they could do it.
No. We need to invest in more scientific research for dark matter. Dark matter = unlimited energy = utopian society
>>56732637
Fallout world was pretty based so ye
>>56733795
#DMM
#Dark Matter Matters
yep, Trump should come out in support.
>>56732637
NO havn't u heard if chernobal
>>56733659
Did you stop using planes America?
>>56733878
France just had 138 people die. Are you guys upping your security like we did after 9/11? Any big changes yet?
>>56733498
>what is yucca mountain
>>56734046
A bandaide for a bullet wound.
>>56733815
To bad fallout 4 is one of the most boring, bland games I've ever played.
>>56732637
I want to live in a S.T.A.L.K.E.R. world, so yes.
>>56733815
Yeah if I were to somehow be safe during nuclear Armageddon and come find some woods untouched by radiation. Living in the woods would be great. I welcome nuclear power
>>56734150
nigga u serious? that game is great.
>>56732637
Yes
>>56732637
No, mostly to do with the problem of dealing with the waste - it remains deadly for timescales that are far beyond our abilities to guarantee that it will remain safe and will not contaminate the biosphere. Also the potential consequences when accidental/intentional contamination does occur. Finally, that it produces material for WMDs.
>>56732637
It's too dangerous. Nuclear power makes it easier for countries to develop nuclear weapons. India used material produced from a joint Canada/USA research reactor to develop its nukes. There is no way to police it effectively.
>>56734251
You play bo3? If you do, that's why you don't realize what is wrong with fallout 4. No rpg elements, dialogue system is watered down, leveling system is utter shit, settlement building has no purpose but to waste time and produce times/caps:
yes anyone who says no is a kek
>>56733495
>>56733386
They cant. Germany is mentally disabled.
>>56734251
>fallout 3 was my first fallout the post
Its shit. Its call of duty set in 50s post-post-apocalypse with rpg elements. The factions suck, just like skyrim.
>>56734459
look up generation 4 reactor. They reuse the waste from previous reactor generations.
>>56734459
Load it onto rockets and fire that shit onto the moon. It sounds so simple and stupid, but it makes sense. Remember gasoline used to be considered a waste product.
Fire up those nuclear power plants, waste products kept on moon until someone can find a use for it.
>>56734495
Who cares you neckbeard nigger, it had an interesting setting and I had fun playing it.
>>56733495
Although I'm all pro nuclear shit there's quite a few reactors which simply aren't safe and only ticking timebombs. Most of them are in eastern europe. And Mama Merkel allowed them to stay open longer or something.
>>56734799
I like this idea. Let's just make our future colony completely uninhabitable with radiation.
>>56734459
>>56734478
>>56733659
>>56733795
>>56733633
>>56732912
>>56732637
>>56735067
For you non-believers of nuclear power
>>56735027
This is something I was actually thinking about. There should be some sort of global committee in charge of overseeing nuclear powerplant construction. Making sure they are ran safely, in a safe spot, and shit isn't leaking. The only issue with this is governments are known for corruption.
>>56735067
Please, the moon is a barren rock and useful for nothing more than a jumping point to Mars.
>there's no radiation in space
>>56734495
>No rpg elements
So the loot system, character customisation, exp, SPECIAL system, inventory management, dialogue choices. Not a single one of these is RPG relevant?
>>56732637
No
>>56735014
>Ad-Hom
>Fun meme
Its a watered down rehashed piece of shit that even normies are seeing how shit it is. I played it for 8 hours and haven't picked it up since. Holy shit nothing says fun like throwing pieces of shits on guns that do absolutely nothing but "do +10% damage to ghouls" bravo Todd. Also removing skills is such a slap in the face the game is so fucking easy it not even remotely fun.
Only reason I even pirated it was the modding community..
>>56734495
No. I have been playing PC RPG games since the 90's. If I wanted RPG elements of a stronger quality I will play something else. I just know how to relax and take a game for what it is.
daily reminder that Iran has nuclear power and there are states in the United States that still run off of coal
>>56735335
The forced story for muh son and the voice for the protagonist just ruins it. You could make a nigger and the voice would not match whatsoever (not like I would ever make a black).
For special I don't if it's completely an improvement. I wished they mixed that and skills. There is no level cap for such a small game. It just comes down to endless grinding at some points.
For speech and writing of dialogue, it literally doesn't matter what you say. You get the same generic response. It only really affects what your companion thinks of you. It's shit.
>>56733659
Not likely.
You can't cross the fence without being spotted.
There's 30 police officers trained by our SWAT.
All access to reactor buildings and control rooms are sealed.
SWAT would be called for any serious threat.
>>56735249
None of that matters once the material is used in bombs. Any nation that develops nuclear power is just one election away from developing nuclear weapons.
>>56735711
>If I wanted RPG elements of a stronger quality I will play something else.
Oh ok. So its completely ok for a company to shit on established lore for a quick buck.
>>56732637
No, we don't know what to do with the waste yet.
The solution to pollution isn't dilution.
>>56736248
Then why hasnt all 30+ nations that already have nuclear power not make nuclear bomb? Because it would be politically disastrous. North Korea is the only one that is close to using one and they still havent.
>>56735311
Look up the IAEA
>>56736413
Other countries have been recycling their fuel and have been reusing it, but we're afraid to do so because muh weapons-grade materiel scare.
>>56735067
>moon
>future colony
>>56736558
The point is that they COULD start making bombs any time they wanted. Sure, reactor grade plutonium doesn't make nearly the same level of bang as weapons grade plutonium, but its still too dangerous.
Y E S
E
S
yes as long as we keep it out of private hands
>>56733386
>German coal industry shills and OPEC oil interests spout anti nuclear propaganda
What else is new?
>>56736752
That argument is like saying people with cars could kill people and that we should not have them. Yes it is possible other nations could make bombs, but again it is political suicide. Sanctions and military action would take out any country that is willing to do so. But preferable just the threat of one or both is enough.
>>56732637
No. Nuclear Bombs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrkzIN2eP0U
>>56732637
thorium salt passive cooled reactors if made feasible would be much better than any 'green' energy weve come up with so far
>>56732637
Mutti says no, so no.
I trust her. She always makes the right decisions.
>>56732637
yes
Shoot everyone who says no
>>56737300
>That argument is like saying people with cars could kill people and that we should not have them.
The stakes involved with nuclear weapons are quite a bit more intense than with cars, anon.
>56732637
https://youtu.be/pVbLlnmxIbY
Of course
>>56732637
Cheap electricity for sale. All EU can buy. Delivery very fast. You know you need it with this cold winter. Send a mail now to [email protected]
>>56739178
Well no shit its only white and asian countries that would have nuclear power
>>56732637
Yes, nuclear energy is the future
>>56734799
Too risky. What if the rocket blows up.
I say seal it shut and drop it into the middle of the pacific
>>56732637
>running our own nuclear plants on our own soil
>in a country pushing one of the highest security standards world wide
>cheap and clean power for everybody
>OR
>shut down all of our own plants
>import nuclear power up road from shit tier countries with close to no security standards
>energy prices rise by 400%
yes indeed
not what our stupid cunt says
>>56732637
Yes
>>56739653
Come on our security standards aren't bad and it's not 400% senpai.
Though we'll keep on building centrals real close to the border if you don't mind, it's to allow better energy delivery.
>>56739401
>its only white and asian countries that would have nuclear power
Is that supposed to be reassuring?
>>56732637
Yes.
Waste is obviously an issue, but so is an inevitable energy crisis.
>>56739809
>NK
>Electricity
Heh.
>>56739808
prices did jump by 400% for ecological power
aka. the green unreliable shit which gets funded by our gov like crazy will nobody wants it
was actually referring to security in Czech republic nuclear plants
which honestly mostly doesn't exist at all
