is male circumcision equal to to female genital mutilation?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/3u5n0f/whats_something_that_you_are_positively_sick_of/cxc6ybm
Well, I'll be perfectly honest, I still feel a decent amount of sexual sanctification though I've never become addicted to pussy like all of my normal friends so I suppose there is some decrease of sensitivity. Like, they can't got more than a week without pussy but I can manage more than a month easily.
>>56680410
no, it's the equivalent of male genital mutilation
/thread
>>56680410
>>56680410
It's worse because men are actually human.
>>56680770
because no one can find ugly mutilated dicks
nice logic
are you a woman?
>>56680410
Both are unjustifiable religious shit, so yes.
I played hockey with both an uncircumcised guy and Saddam Hussein's second cousin. Guess who got made fun of more.
It's mutilation indicating you're a degenerate Jew, Muslim or a slave to one of those groups.
How can you defend that?
>>56680410
>female genital mutilation
Be specific.
>>56680940
Well kikes + john harvey kellogg
>>56680410
Yes, it's all the same religious nonsense. My sister just had a son and is planning circumcision, we were raised Catholic. Same bullshit, different words
>>56681200
I'd say its more similar to Type 1 or 2. 3 is closer to chopping the whole head off but opening the urethra.
>>56680410
no its very healthy to cut half your dick off
>people defending genital mutilation
for what purpose?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTxD6l-8ppw&feature=youtu.be&t=3m24s
>>56680410
>>Somehow religious arguments come from a natural part of the human body
>>The rest don't know how to take a bath or a shower
I thought this was 2015, not the dark ages.
>>56680711
I really don't think that has anything to do with it bro. Some people just don't have a huge sex drive.
>>56680770
Some people aren't fucking disgusting.
>>56681829
>CURRENT YEAR
>I MEAN COME ON!
>WHY ARE WE STILL DISCUSSING THIS?
>>56680410
Yes its a barbaric desert religion practice
>>56681200
Type D is the best. Can you imagine how tight that shit is? I've been working my girlfriend over on the idea for awhile now, almost there /pol/.
>>56682209
The purpose of that is that the girl stays virgin, the husband mudslime will cut open the "prize" on the wedding night.
>>56680770
do you guys not see the Cheetos?
>>56681767
>uncut version
kek
Bananas aren't cantaloupes but it doesn't make one right and the other wrong. Both are wrong.
>>56682209
>dick so small he needs to sew a girl's vag together
>>56680711
Circumcision wouldn't affect your sex drive.
>>56682098
Why was it even discussed in the first place is the question.
>>56680410
No, they're not comparable and female genital mutilation often has much worse consequences.
http://thecircumcisiondecision.com/male-vs-female-circumcision/
>>56681767
So unbelievably fucked up. You have to be super fucking sick in the head to mutilate a defenseless baby like that. People will look back on this in the future and see all the stupid fucking chanting and be in utter shock over how fucking delusional humans used to be.
>>56683276
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2ULvT_ddnM
>>56683318
How do these people sit around chanting like monkeys with their stupid Jew curls and dumb yarmulkes and not realize how fucking crazy they look? How does one indoctrinate someone into this madness? I thought kikes were supposed to be smart.
>>56680410
No, uncircumcised males dicks are gross looking, slimy and smelly
I'm a girl btw
>>56683544
i am girl too, i like 3 inch dicks, anything bigger hurts
>>56683151
In all seriousness, the actual practices are nowhere near comparable. Unless the doctor snips parts of the actual penis off, its not the same, at all.
http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/overview/en/
>>56681467
I believe about 80% of FGM cases literally remove part or all of the clitoris so in regards to Types I, II, etc., they can't really be compared.
>>56680410
>is male circumcision equal to to female genital mutilation?
Male genital mutilation is worse. Good goyim still think it's medicine.
>>56683692
>In all seriousness, the actual practices are nowhere near comparable.
Yeah, circumcision still happens in 1st world countries, and only continues because the kikes need the raw materials for Alloderm and Apligraf. Male genital mutilation continues because of the kikes harvesting tissue for medical grafts.
Also MGM occurs far more often than FGM.
>>56680410
The image in OP is also misleading, since many male genital mutilations remove way more tissue that your image would depict. The higher up your circumcision scar is on your shaft, the more nerve endings they cut away and sold off for collagen and fibroblasts.
They are moral equivalents. They're obviously not the same practice because they're two different body parts, but it's morally the same. It's only Jewish lobbying and "I want my kid's dick to be as fucked up as mine" people keeping it going.
I'm circumcised. I've come to terms with it and I rarely even think about it, I never knew anything else so it feels normal and I didn't realize what had been done to me until I was like 17. But I won't do it to my children.
>>56683445
Kikes are the most smug, self-assured monsters on earth.
>>56683967
>I rarely even think about it
Mine bugs me everyday. I want to be mutilated. It would be easier to handle a birth defect or an injury I caused myself than being betrayed by my parents and crippling me before I could ever use my cock once.
>>56680410
I don't know. Is a face lift the same as a decapitation?
>>56684105
*I want to be NOT mutilated
>>56683950
This guy should concentrate on cutting that wart off his face instead of baby penises.
>>56684105
To be frank before I saw this thread I hadn't thought about being circumcised for over half a year.
I'm glad it's easy to forget about for me, it seems like the kind of thing that could really fuck you up if you think about it too much. I know my parents didn't mean to do anything wrong and were just brainwashed by society and irresponsible doctors.
>>56680410
No, but they're useless practices either way.
American women don't even know what circumcision is and actually believe that dicks are naturally that way.
>>56680410
Nobody's genitals should be cut while they're too young to comprehend what's happening. Also a reminder that circumcision is a Jewish practice.
>>56683692
Nope, the majority of the clitoris resides underneath the skin where it is never removed. This part is identical to the external part and is the reason why FGM reversal surgery available in Africa brings an affected woman to 99% of normal. It is actually less severe than standard circumcision.
>>56680410
circumcised = greater chance of suffering from erectile dysfunction
I don't think anyone on /pol/, circumcised or not, can legitimately defend this Jewish mutilation.
thank god every day that my parents weren't stupid enough to circumcise me
in general, the goyim are stupid sheep.
>>56680410
Not neally as bad but still bad
>>56684270
What makes me think about it is the knowledge that there's efforts to undo it and bring back the nerve endings. It may be possible in my youth, and the idea you can change something also makes you think about it more. Regenerative medicine can already make vaginas, sphincters, fingertips, etc, and there's Foregen working specifically on the human foreskin.
>>56685145
It's also for niggers.
Yeah it's pretty bad.
I'm circumsized and have a severe lack of sensitivity. Very severe. My life is basically ruined. I'm pretty lucky with regards to most of my genetics overall, as to why I haven't killed myself yet. But yeah, I gotta see a doctor one of these days senpai.
>>56685496
It depends on "how much they take off the top". The cutfags that "like" being mutilated, usually do not have a lot cut away, and they aren't as sexually handicapped.
They mutilate you without knowing if your cock is 4in as an adult or 8in. And in the US, they usually take AS MUCH as they can (high and tight cut).
>>56686226
>>>/gif/
find something you like
godspeed
>>56686226
>>56686701
You can reach out directly to Foregen or to separate endeavors at the Wake Forest Institute of Regenerative Medicine.
WFIRM deals specifically with genital injuries, often for soldiers who suffered injuries in the Middle East. IED's usually fuck up your genitals.
Regenerated vaginas exist and have already been transplanted for women, but still nothing in the news for human men. Atala did successful work with rabbit penises last year.
>>56683692
>Unless the doctor snips parts of the actual penis off
the foreskin is part of the actual penis.
>>56682763
Give that anon a break. Maybe his girlfriend likes orgies with her black friends and she got a bit loose?
>>56687707
Yessir. People also "restore" different than "regeneration".
Restoring is stretching residual tissue and expanding it over time (like gauge earrings or getting fat). It can restore sensitivity to the glans (assuming there's not a big injury to it, and some of the surviving mucosa and your frenumum remnant), but it does not give you back the structures lost in a circumcision (nerve endings, the ridged band, full frenumum attached, etc). That's why there's a pursuit for regeneration and transplaning a scaffold like Foregen.
Pic is a tapless device (the DTR) used by guys with slack skin.
>>56686097
>>56686226
>>56686563
>>56686701
Is the JIDF out hunting tonight?
>>56680410
no because at least 50% of those girls are traumatised by it and 99% of cut males aren't
>>56688490
nah i just don't want my shit archived on this topic.
>>56683276
>humans
>>56680410
FGM and circumcision are not the same.
One removes the entirety of a sex organ, and the other removes some skin around it. If you want to make FGM comparable to circumcision, you can say that FGM is like cutting the entire head of the penis off.
>>56688559
see
>>56685468
I would say 99% are traumatized and don't know it. + Kikewashing
>>56680410
TINY
WHITE
DICKS
>>56688961
on a principal level, they are the same, mutilation.
>women: my body, my choice
>men:circumcised moments after birth without personal consent
:^)
In principle yes, but in practice no. When done on infants they should both be serious crimes.
Male circumcision is a completely unnecessary and potentially harmful procedure. So in that way it is the same as female circumcision.
That said, without complications it doesn't affect sex drive, climax, or reproduction. It also doesn't interfere with the daily use of the penis such as when urinating. If anything, it improves the process of urinating and cleaning by not having skin in the way. So no, it's not the same as female circumcision.
There really isn't a sensible analogy to male circumcision that I've heard of. Hundreds of millions of men are circumcised and they're all pissing, fucking, jizzing, and reproducing just fine.
>>56681539
Oh, I agree my Semitic friend.
>>56689244
Uh and how does FGM differ exactly? it affects none of the things you said.
>>56689526
Learn to read, dipshit:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation#Complications
Particularly:
>women with FGM were twice as likely to report no sexual desire and 52 percent more likely to report dyspareunia (painful sexual intercourse). One third reported reduced sexual feelings.
Protip: Circumsized men LOVE to fuck and cum.
And so you'll actually read shit:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Adverse_effects
Just to be clear:
>Circumcision does not appear to decrease the sensitivity of the penis, harm sexual function or reduce sexual satisfaction.
Quit being a fucking paranoid dickskin fetishist. Male circumcision is completely unnecessary and should be phased out, but it is nothing, NOTHING comparable to FGM.
>>56680410
I honestly think that circumcised dicks look better (and a lot of women do too) but that does not justify mutilation.
>>56690075
Well I deleted my posts earlier, but gonna resay it. I'm 25. I've been circumsized. My dick is over 6 inches. It's fairly aesthetic. No weird fucking curve, no mushroom tip, no outrageous fucking veins or bumps. But, i've never actually been able to be stimulated to orgasm. I get wet dreams, because body does it's shit I guess, but I have basically zero sensitivity, and as a result zero sex drive.
And I also can't even speak up on it or i'll get laughed out of the room, pretty fucking horrible situation m8. Reason I haven't killed myself yet is because i'm doing shit with school/research, still trying to help out humanity while i'm here I guess. But yeah, just trust, I don't know ANYONE else in the entire world who this happens to, even on the internet, but this shit is pretty fucking terrible.
I just wanna be able to spread muh superior aryan genes..............
>>56690520
/feels
Have you looked into prostate stimulation?
>>56688559
>boys don't feel pain or are traumatized
>this is also a justification for electivly removing health tissue from a non-consenting minor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1kSx4TkuRo
Watch the whole goddamn thing.
>>56680410
yes
>>56690678
Yeah i've experimented. I think psychology may have also been a contributing factor, I don't think I have a great imagination. Or, well, maybe I do have a good imagination, but not in the sense that i can be entertained by porn and shit like that. As I grow a bit older I realize that the problem is also medical, due to the circumcision. Masturbating is literally painful. My fully erect dick is probably supposed to be closer to 7 inches, but there isn't enough skin for it to stretch so a fully erect dick is literally painful. Combined with having no sensitivity ANYWAYS, and you get this shit.
>>56689106
You should go back to 9th grade sexual education class and re-learn the differences between penises and vaginas.
My dad was born in Ireland and when the doctor said he was going to circumsize me an my brother he told him fuck no. Couldn't be any more proud to know I have a complete penor.
honestly can't believe it's even legal anymore
>>56684110
JIDF detected, please go kill yourself.
>>56680410
yes, genital mutilation is genital mutilation.
>>56691243
There are nerve endings in the foreskin that make sex much more pleasurable for uncut people.
Also, removing a body part unnecessarily on an baby is literally mutilation.
>there are people in this very thread with jewdicks who actually think they're white
wew lad
genital mutilation of children, to any degree, is still genital mutilation
I had no say in the matter. I think my dad was vehemently against it but my mom wanted it. Maybe it was a Christian thing. They divorced a few years after that.
>>56692409
What a slag.
I'd go fuck her shit up.
>>56692409
The Bible literally says there is no value in it.
do people genuinely believe uncut dicks look different when erect?
>>56680410
This obsession/outrage over circumcision is honestly one of the most baffling and autistic trends I know of. You lost like 1" of totally useless skin. Now you don't have dick cheese. Lol, get over it.
>>56680410
FGM, isn't just removing the clitoral hood, it's removing the whole clitoris, so it's a lot more extreme.
>>56680410
This shit should be seen as illegal mutilation and there should be a 30 year limitation, so that everyone can sue the fu.cking priest or his parents for lifetime damages.
Glad there is no such stuff in germany, at least if you are not a muslim/jew.
>>56690520
If you actually think you have a disorder where you can't achieve orgasm it's your obligation to seek medical advice and attention.
Because there's pretty much zero evidence of male circumcision affecting sex drive or climax. So if you are walking around with proof between your legs, go see a doctor and get looked at.
I'm definitely not saying your wrong, I'm just saying that there is no evidence to suggest that circumcision affects sexual activity in any way. So if you're packing evidence, go get yourself studied.
I was cut at age 15, my parents had me while working overseas so they had my brother and I do it when we moved back to the USA. We thought it was the thing to do so we just went along with what mom and dad said we needed to have done. Honestly I prefer it cut, I never noticed any loss in sensitivity that gets brought up, its easier to clean, and I prefer masturbating without the skin like it is now. After I was cut, aside from the healing pain my dick was not overly sensitive uncovered or anything, although I did not have sex till about 5 years after so I cant say if that was any different. I'm going to guess it would not have been though since jacking off was the same if not nicer since I had the smooth full contact without the skin.
I think a lot of this shit is in peoples heads that think they got robbed of something as a child. I personally would cut it again if I was given the choice though.
>>56693117
>there is no evidence to suggest that circumcision affects sexual activity in any way.
>cutting off the most sensitive area of the penis
>not affecting sexual activity
AMERICA
M
E
R
I
C
A
>>56686294
>Be trasnsexual non-binary gender-queer he/him
>Want a penis
>Bio-engineering is ethically wrong
What do?
#ThanksWhiteMen
>>56691243
see
>>56692172
>Also, removing a body part unnecessarily on an baby is literally mutilation.
this is the point.
Female circumcision has a lot of variants. If you compare it to the variety where they just remove the clitoral hood, then the comparison holds; but the goal of female circumcision is often to remove the incentive or ability to have sex, whereas male circumcision is for religious or cosmetic reasons typically. Male circumcision wouldn't even be bad if it was exclusively for adult men who chose the procedure.
Circumcision is equal to cutting off a girl's pissflaps.
Female circumcision usually cuts the clit off, which is equal to cutting the whole dick head off.
>>56693504
I wish some rich faggot jew tranny would spend the money for a real cock transplanted on. At least I could get a foreskin after the more complicated procedure is done.
I was circumcised when I was 13 years old because I had a bad case of phimosis, otherwise I would keep getting painful erections and sometimes pain when I needed to pee. It's not bad in the mayority of cases, but forcing to get it when you are a baby is terrible
>>56694124
More like the clitoral hood, both are for protection. Pissflaps are the scrotum.
>>56693198
But it's not the most sensitive.
https://youtu.be/Xx_ov2NiNo4?t=3m27s
Seriously why isn't Hitchens a /pol/ hero? is it because of atheism? When will you get redpilled on religion?
>>56694429
I had this too, my forskin eventually just stretched out. Glad I still have it.
It's worse because with females you're just removing a small part of the entire clit. With males you're removing the most sensitive part of the skin.
![L1mGaPZ[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/u7Ld5QJ.jpg "L1mGaPZ[1].jpg")
mfw British and people don't mutilate their genitals here.
>Experience sex the way it's supposed to be
>Not following a Jewish religis ritual
>Feels good man
Inb4 b..b..but l..l...less chance of g..g...getting aids.
I used restorative techniques to get maybe an inch of skin and I have to say it's been nicer to fap I guess. I don't like playing devils advocate but it hasn't been divine pleasure either, I'm not sure what I expected, but I still can't argue about muh nerve endings because I don't know. Also the dryness isn't permanent, it's smoother now.
>>56694484
Yes it is.
>
The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce
is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06685.x/asset/j.1464-410X.2006.06685.x.pdf;jsessionid=EA281C6CB91B4A11C4B1C72AE8D86B1B.f01t03?v=1&t=ihepl4j9&s=0fb14eace335cd2cccc7c374c4caa519dafd4e7d
>>56694860
The sorts of nerves your foreskin has don't grow back.
>>56694892
>>56694484
>The analysis sample consisted of 1059 uncircumcised and 310 circumcised men.
For the glans penis, circumcised men reported decreased sexual pleasure and lower orgasm intensity. They also stated more effort was required to achieve orgasm, and a higher percentage of them experienced unusual sensations (burning, prickling, itching, or tingling and numbness of the glans penis).
For the penile shaft a higher percentage of circumcised men described discomfort and pain, numbness and unusual sensations.
In comparison to men circumcised before puberty, men circumcised during adolescence or later indicated less sexual pleasure at the glans penis, and a higher percentage of them reported discomfort or pain and unusual sensations at the penile shaft.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11761.x/full
>>56694622
>british and people
i knew it
Worse because it's being done to boys.
>>56695002
Shit.
Ssssssay, you wouldn't happen to let usssss know where you live would you? hssss
>>56694622
I think you should be worrying more about AIDS with all your niggers and sand niggers running around. Reminder that if you don't give in it's racism :^)
>>56694892
Your cutting of the foreskin which makes the most sensitive area less sensitive. "Cutting off the most sensitive area of the penis" and your cutting off the foreskin. I am not disagreeing with you but you actually proved my statement.
Yes.
>>56694484
>B-but guys there's no evidence!
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/catp/1999/00000019/00000001/art00018
>The complications of traditional male circumcision were studied in 48 boys seen between January 1981 and December 1995. Their ages ranged from 3 days to 7 years (mean: 4 years). Haemorrhage, the commonest complication, was seen in 25 (52%) and infection in ten; one child had amputation of the penis. Other complications included meatal stenosis and urethro-cutaneous fistula. Sixty-four per cent of those with haemorrhage were neonates and their haemoglobin levels ranged between 6 and 15 g/dl. Three required blood transfusion, seven ligation of bleeding vessels and two required both. Overall, 21 patients required surgery and the average duration of hospital stay was 2-8 days. Most complications were seen between 1991 and 1995 when surgical fees had been introduced and the number of boys circumcised in our hospital decreased.
>>56695124
You know what the term "ablate" means, right?
>>56680410
Both are equally bad, the parents who mutilate their kids should be shot. Why would anyone ever want to cut away healthy skin?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_zkKciuIpA
>>56694484
the underside of the foreskin is the most sensitive part of my nob m8.
>>56695240
>Why would anyone ever want to cut away healthy skin?
religion
>>56695222
Ugh, as you said the Foreskin directly affects the sensitivity of the penis, but as I said the foreskin its self is not the most sensitive area of the penis. I'm not sure what your doing now.
>>56694484
Not for you any more no, but for the rest of us with our dicks intact it is.
I mean i'm happy I don't have a wormdick but seeing that baby scream like that makes me wonder how bad it hurt when I was born. At least we wont remember it.
>>56695353
>Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis.
>Definition of ABLATE. transitive verb. : to remove or destroy especially by cutting, abrading, or evaporating. intransitive verb. : to become ablated; especially : vaporize 1.
>>56695396
Hurting children is ok as long as they won't remember it?
>>56680410
>is male circumcision equal to to female genital mutilation?
No, female circumcision has benefits (less AIDS), MGM increases AIDS risk and many other things.
Infibulated females have a lot of sex and a lot of orgasms.
>>56695396
So you're okay with having an insensitive dick and never achieving full orgasm?
>>56695478
I don't know, all I can say is i'm happy my dick doesn't look ugly as it's the only thing im proud of on my entire body
Feels good being circumsised.
Also feels good knowing it's always anteaters who make these threads. Brings a smile to my face to see their insecurity on display daily for all of /pol/ to see.
>>56695525
>cut
>my dick doesn't look ugly
Anon...
>>56695570
>implying looking like a sperglord is better
>>56695410
>>56695166
>>56695319
Perhaps I need a wakeup call on what you guys determine is foreskin and what isn't. I'm really confused on what your trying to say. "Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" which doesn't prove the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. I think to clear the air hear uncut>cut, happy? But as the foreskin of course is not only connected to but directly affects the sensitivity of the penis, but in it of itself is not the most sensitive part of the penis. Jesus fuck.
>>56695564
>implying it's not cutfags who make these threads
I've got a bad circumcision and I HATE it
The only thing stopping me from being the one to make these threads is knowing that if I start doing it, I've got enough bottled up hate to make sure there's 24/7 threads about this shit
>>56683692
>In all seriousness, the actual practices are nowhere near comparable. Unless the doctor snips parts of the actual penis off, its not the same, at all.
Why are you spewing your bullshit? Cutting off the foreskin is like cutting out 3 clitorises. The clitoris is a tiny blob of tissue (8000 nerve endings with no other purpose than stimulation) whereas the foreskin is an organ that has many functions and has 20000 nerve endings (3x more than the whole clit).
The typical female circumcision doesn't even cut off the clit, but a tiny piece that nearly has no nerve endings. It's done so that women orgasm better, many Western women do this voluntarily if they have orgasm difficulties.
>>56695610
>Caring so much about what some dumb whore thinks about your dick that you'd defend it being chopped up.
Start thinking about YOUR pleasure.
>>56695525
An uncut dick looks exactly what a dick is supposed to look like.
A cut dick just looks like a dick affected by jewish beauty standards
>>56695656
see >>56695498
It has even more citations saying the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis.
>>56695658
It's always anteaters. Always.
Lurk more.
>>56689106
>on a principal level, they are the same, mutilation.
Not exactly, female circumcision usually removes only the hood, it's a tiny bloodless snip, that leaves the clit exposed during sex (-> greater pleasure for the woman).
Male circumcision is mutilation.
>>56695688
This
Anyone thinking their cut dick looks better has literally actually absolutely been brainwashed by the jewish cult
>>56695670
Well you might be having the best fap of your life but I feel fine, I don't really care what i'm missing out on.
>>56695564
In a country where the vast majority have intact penises there's nothing to be insecure about.
>>56695656
Also to add, the first person I responded to said "CUT OFF" not "ABLATE" saying Circumcision ablates the most sensitive part of the penis is different than directly saying CUT OFF.
>>56694484
>I can tell how sensitive it is despite having no memory of it
>>56695784
That's wrong, female circumcision cuts the clit off.
>>56695718
Fuck that, I'm in no mood for your shitposting here
>>56680853
>religious shit
Do you know fimosis?
>>56695662
>he foreskin is an organ that has many functions and has 20000 nerve endings
That number is wrong. Circumcision is bad but if you're going to argue with false data you're just asking to be rekt in an arguments.
http://thecircumcisiondecision.com/20000-nerve-endings/
>>56695610
>>56695791
Imagine the best orgasm you ever had in your life.
That's what someone who is uncut gets on a bad fap.
>>56695911
reeally sure that should be the other way around.
>>56695862
No, it doesn't. Only some female circumcisions do, and even then these women have more orgasms and sex than Western cunts.
>>56695868
Yes, it affects 1 in 100 men and rarely requires circumcision (1 in 16,667 of total men)
Based on either Finnish or Norwegian studies where MGM isn't allowed for non-medical reasons
>>56695866
Okay newcunt. I'm happy you got a botched circumcision. Sounds like you deserved it.
>>56680770
>>56681767
>>56683785
>>56683874
>>56684002
>>56684147
>>56685862
>>56685468
>>56685935
>>56686058
>>56688163
>>56691023
>>56694424
just you guys why, why are you so fucking disgusting
>>56695882
He doesn't disprove anything. He even lists 20000 to 70000. Shows you how inferior the clit is.
>>56695818
Definition of ABLATE. transitive verb. : to remove or destroy especially by cutting, abrading, or evaporating. intransitive verb. : to become ablated; especially : vaporize 1.
>>56695791
It doesn't matter whether you care; it's already too late as the decision was made for you.
>>56696131
and I have absolutely no problem with it.
>>56696039
Go back to sucking your emu overlord's dick you damn criminal scum
>>56695868
>implying phimosis is the biggest reason circumcision is done
Circumcision is done in the middle east due to religion and elsewhere from that religion manifesting itself into the culture..
Any medical conditions that makes circumcision neccesary is rare and is absolutely not good enough reason to lop off piece of someone's dick as a precausion.
Which is why there is only two reasons circumcision should be done
1: Because it's a medical neccessity
2: Because the boy is 18 years old and choose to do it himself.
If you are ok with unjustified mutilation of childrens genitals, you are literally a wrse person than you could be by not being on that boat.
>>56695712
I'll look it up
>>56695001
Confirms the importance of the foreskin, but I couldn't see anything relating to which part of the penis is the most sensitive. Ok article.
>>56694892
Link doesn't work
>>56695166
This shows ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about sensitivity. Holy shit you are stupid, I'm actually getting mad because instead of listening to what I have to say your spouting memes that are partially unrelated to my statement. You have to realize I don't give a shit about aids or smegma facts. I don't even think cut>uncut but I'm saying the foreskin (While important) is not the most sensitive part of the penis, I'd like a diagram or something to clinically tell me what is and isn't foreskin.
>>56680410
Yes, it a mutilation.
It's only common in barbarian sand-nigger or sand-nigger-controlled countries.
>>56680410
It's not equal, but it's still a harmful practice pushed by religion.
A man with a circumcised penis is less sensitive and thus feels less during sex.
The operation could be botched causing even worse damage.
It's ironic to post this on post, but a feminist made a pretty good video against circumcision:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAzZeLwFNuU
uncutfags desperately defending their position
>"muh pleasure"
>"muh nerve endings"
It must suck to know that women have to deal with uncut dicks and only be "ok with it" instead of actually enjoying a cut dick
>>56680410
It is mutilation by definition.
>>56696178
You've got an ugly dick :^)))))))))
I bet your parents told Mr Shekelburg to botch it on purpose so it matches the rest of your appearance.
>>56696178
>Go back to sucking your emu overlord's dick
That's kind funny, sounds almost like your rabbi sucking yours when you get your bris
>>56685862
Okay, so now we can get mutilated and get to buy it back from our jew overlords?
>>56695868
On a newborn? I am dying to get a precedent on this, medically valid circumcision on a newborn.
>>56696110
You should read the article, or even skim over it.
>First, it might be prudent to be skeptical about the exact number – average, or mean – cells on a foreskin. Maybe the number of nerve endings is accurate. But maybe, the number isn’t. What is certain is that more research is needed, research that can be replicated, and perhaps, research done on larger groups and over longer periods, since nerve cells, as we have learned previously, tend to decrease with age.
>Secondly, even results of studies showing sensitivity to the foreskin and to the glans make it difficult, if not impossible, to draw a firm conclusion.
>Finally, given the uncertainty of some of the data, the polarity of feelings about what data does exist, the polarity of feelings about being circumcised, it is difficult to look at the number often stated as truly factual, or to use it as evidence to use in a decision about circumcision.
>>56695921
Confirmed. Stimulating the glans with the foreskin fully out of the way is a really lackluster fap. I imagine losing the foreskin would be like losing a limb. Think about what you're doing to your kids, americlaps.
>>56696176
What's your participation in this thread then?
>>56680410
Worse because its done on a far wider scale, there is no legitimate argument for circumcision of Europeans. Shitskins are dirty so who cares about them but here in the first world we have running water so its degenerate not to keep clean, and thus completely unnecessary for the supposed sanitary function. Obviously no one with any sense whatsoever would support female circumcision and yet somehow otherwise reasonably intelligent and rational people are willing to overlook the fact they are slave goyim to the kikes. Circumcision is barbary but thankfully its not widespread in NZ or my homecountry (England, well not widespread among us actual English Anglo-Celts), but I can't help but feel somewhat bad for the European Americans who cling to their ignorance and savagery. Keked by the wily jew.
>>56696266
Its onyl normal in murca and the middle east to see cut dicks
>>56696631
I guess my bias is because growing up as a kid watching porn i'd only see cut dicks. The first time I saw an uncut dick I was horrified, but then again that works the other way around too. No one influenced me to like cut dicks, it's just been that way. We should all just agree to disagree.
>>56696899
We should all agree to disagree and make it illegal to perform on anyone under the age of 18.
>can't drink
>can't have sex
>can have parts of your dick cut off by someone else
>>56680711
I'm not circumcised and I pass up mediocre pussy if Im not in the mood
>>56680410
>is male circumcision equal to to female genital mutilation?
Yes, they're both mutilations of the respective genitals. You need to have a catastrophic failure in logic not to understand that.
I would probably kill myself if I were cut. My foreskin is probably the source of 50% of my sensations.
>mfw putting my finger between my glans and foreskin and doing little circles
>cutfags will never know how it feels
>>56697134
Same
>>56689244
>Hundreds of millions of men are circumcised and they're all pissing, fucking, jizzing, and reproducing just fine.
Yes and I could cut off any number of your body parts and you'd still function largely the same, probably do with a few less digits on your hands and feet, we could lop some of them off, probably lop off your nose without too much issue, we could scalp you, that wouldn't really be too bad. We could mutilate you pretty badly under these standards without too much issue.
Obviously the point is that mutilation of ANY kind without strict medical benefit to the individual is morally wrong, it violates the basic principles of human ethical behaviour which is to not initiate violence against others.
If people want to get circumcised when they're older and can consent to it then that's great and people should have access to education to make an informed decision.
IT IS ALL JOHN HARVEY KELLOGG'S FAULT. END THIS MAN'S TERRIBLE MEME. THE INJUSTICE NEEDS TO STOP.
>>56680410
no
both are an abomination but female genital mutilation is much worse. The male equivalent to removing the clitoris would be chopping off the entire head of the penis.
>>56697013
or a basic understanding of biology. The clitoris is the biological equivalent of the head of the penis. Imagine chopping off the entire head of your penis. You have to admit it's worse.
>>56698245
Yeah the female equivalent of male circumcision would be removing the Grafenberg Spot.
>>56682209
Fun idea: kill yourself
>>56698391
mate please be less wrong
>>56698245
>The clitoris is the biological equivalent of the head of the penis
>You have to admit it's worse
Entirely depends on the type of female genital mutilation, there are different types that remove and/or sew up different parts, so there's no one single exact equivalent, but the argument that it's morally wrong is not affected by this, cutting anything off anyone without their consent is immoral and shouldn't be allowed in civilized society.
>>56688045
>dick so small his girlfriend cheats on him
same game faggot
Circumcision only caught on in the USA because people thought that it would stop boys for masturbating.
>>56680410
Yes. FGM has many faces, one of which is piercing or removal of the clitoral hood, which is basically the exact sale procedure as common in third world males. Since that is considered genital mutilation, there's no way to not consider the male variant the same.
Apart from the pretty clear definition of mutilation itself.
>>56689244
>there are people who will literally cut off a part of their body because it's "convenient" to not have to take half a second pulling a flap of skin away when they pee
Might as well cut my nose off desu, it will make breathing easier and I'll never have to worry about getting stuffy. And imagine all the shoes that will fit me after I cut my toes off
>>56698748
Lot of certainty for a circumcised dong.
>>56681767
kek
>>56695319
That's your frenular delta, m8. One of the highest concentrations of nerve endings in the penis and, naturally, removed in many circumcisions. Thank God I still have mine despite being cut.
