Should people receiving government assistance be excluded from voting? Why isn't this a law already?
>>56551235
because those are called democrats and they specifically rigged the system to have a large dependent population that is essentially bribed for votes
>>56551235
I propose we only allow people who own land and people who have served in the military to vote
>>56551357
>rigged
wat
Republicans are guilty of this too. The main difference is their constituency is made of rich businessmen and heirs.
>>56551589
>people who own land and people who have served in the military
I'm with the landowner part. Military service would make sense if we were somewhere like Israel where they actually needed everyone to serve, but it's not like we have that much of a need for enlistment in the US.
Blah blah blah
"Only people I think will vote republican should vote"
Everything you guys are proposing is un-American. So many of our people that are a part of the working class and tend to lean right wing are also dependent on those same handouts. If you guys really want to win you need to wake up and take more interest in converting your oh so precious "democrats".
>>56551235
Only those who own a business and/or property should be allowed to vote.
>>56551235
They should, it's a conflict of interest.
>>56551927
>"Only people I think will vote republican should vote"
I don't even care that much if Bernie Sanders were to be President though. It's more that I think it's dumb we're letting people who are receiving money from the government vote for candidates who will give them more money from the government. It's not exactly a positive cycle.
>>56551235
It should be the law Neets are blowing us the fuck out lately.
>>56552060
republican was never brought up, just government dependencies are not viable citizens to vote.
>>56551808
I was just going Roman man
That's the people who were allowed to vote in the republic
Then again the soldiers were given land after their service and the Roman military is a bit different than the American one
Land owning works fine though
>>56551927
It's not about handouts
It's about who is more invested in the future of America
People who own land (investors) or people who don't?
>>56551235
what about medicaid?
>>56552157
stay on r9k
>>56552157
>tfw getting bullied every Monday on /r9k/ for being a wagekek
I don't even have a gf, enough is enough.
Better get to bed, wagekek. You want to be up bright and early for the daily races :^)
Wagekucks should not be allowed to vote if they are dumb enough to voluntarily continue to perpetuate this outdated system of slavery at the expense of their irreplaceable life and time.
>>56552060
The thing is most of those people relying on government handouts are the ones most depressed with the system. 20 years ago those same fuckers didn't have to rely on handouts and might have even owned land. People are sick and tired of how dismal shit is.
I got interested in this election because of Sanders. Once I started to realize he most likely won't win I started coming to terms with Clinton. Immediately afterwords I became obsessed with Trump and don't see myself turning any time soon.
All of those supposed liberals are just fucking faking it to get by and I believe are most susceptible to being converted to Trump.
The point is you guys need to stop seeing them as worthless and remember they're your fellow country men. Where was Hitler at in life before he came into power?
>>56551235
They tried that. It worked for about 800 years, but then the Black Death happened and the peasants started getting uppity.
>>56552466
>>56551687
>poorest places in the country are republican
????
>>56551235
does seem like there is a conflict of interest desu senpai
>>56551235
Only if rich people coddled by contracts, subsidies, exemptions, and other handouts are also denied the right to vote.
>>56553067
>poorest places in the country are republican
more like stupidest places in the country are Republican
>>56552996
Kek, NEETs are unstoppable.
>>56553685
And so it begins...
