Why do conservatives claim to want small government when they're always demanding more wars, more military spending, more incarceration, more border policing, more deportations, etc?
>>56540918
all of those keep law abiding individuals safe
>>56540918
>implying deportations are more 'government' than all of the free healthcare and education an illegal immigrant gets.
>>56540918
i heard katya had sex with her brother
>>56540918
neo-cons
>>56541012
>Starting wars makes us safe
No, it gives us new enemies
>>56541102
I heard she's now fat and ugly
Why do liberals want socialism when they ought to be polar opposites?
Because terms like "conservative" "right wing", "liberal" and several others barely mean anything any more. They've been twisted and diluted enough that there's barely any consensus left on what they mean, thus making it harder for the public to band together in opposition to a/the government.
>>56540918
America's industrial war complex is not suited to just one party. Look how many invasions Prez Barry has waged.
I'd pay $1000 just to cuddle with her for 10 minutes.
>>56541171
you're right. which is why conservatives also want to end wars instead of just starting them like liberals
>>56541102
>>56541362
Pls no
Source?
Conservatives also claim to support the free market, but they demand more trade sanctions against countries like Cuba and Iran and want to restrict the free movement of labor across countries.
>>56541904
all of those benefit law abiding individuals within our borders
>>56541548
Guys out there get to fuck her for free. She chases after some guys. How does that make you feel?
>>56540918
What they really mean is small government for you, but government for me.
Ever noticed how so many cops, people in the military and pensioners vote right wing?
>we need spending cuts, b-but don't cut my job
>>56541904
nice shill, i bet you didn't even read the above posts.
>>56542740
I did. None of them refutes what I said.
>>56541904
>>56542892
It's funny, because conservatives and liberals are exactly the same. In the realm of war, they are the same and only use different words.
What conservatives call a war, liberals use words like "police actions" or "humanitarian intervention". People act like Obama hasn't killed an insane amount of brown people with drones, and like Clinton didn't bomb the shit out of Serbia for no good reason. They've started as much shit as any Republican president.
>>56543135
Actually more.
1. Conservative movement died in 2008
2. ^ Neocons =/= Right wing
3. Protecting your border and deportation is not a bad thing, and neither is military spendingor big government
4. fuck you
5. Katya is fucking whore and hope there's a video of her being gagged and strangled by Vlad Thundercock so 10,000 /r9k/ fags commit suicide
6. Eat my shit.
>>56543542
>nor is it big government*
>>56541648
I can link you to her instagram. but you have to do me a favour.
>>56541171
>making enemies and letting them live
This isn't how you into war correctly.
>>56543707
What?
>>56540918
The security of our nation from foreign and domestic threats is a cornerstone to our civilization. It's the one thing government should absolutely spend money on.
>>56540918
Democrats start more wars than Republicans.
Bush may have started Iraq (and really, the muslims started Afghanistan), but Osama started Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, and Syria.
I agree OP and also conservatives keep demanding more border control. They want more government control on the border? Some "conservatives" they are.
>>56543852
say "Yummy yummy yummy I love british cummies in my tunny"
![0_e14fa_2e86a591_orig[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/tr4gLES.jpg "0_e14fa_2e86a591_orig[1].jpg")
>>56541904
>restrict the free movement of labor across countries.
There's literally nothing wrong with that. If enough people get together, lets say, a society, and then decide they want to keep X people out in order to "conserve" their society, then more power to them.
Not everyone can be a rootless cosmopolitan jew or internet libertarian.
>>56544079
I meant tummy FUCK
instagram.com/vivecthegod
>>56544079
Yummy yummy yummy i love british cummies in my tunny
>>56543542
she's already on her 3rd ivan
and i have couple of her nudes
i hope r9k commits suicide too
>>56543957
This. This. This.
We would not have any debt issues if the states took control of subsides and not the federal government.
>>56544152
not hers
>>56544152
I will never say anything bad about a brazilian ever again
>>56543542
How does it feel to be half retarded?
>>56544292
Bitch isn't 18 years old anymore. She's 23 now.
>>56542155
Kinda sad I guess. Once I get my VR headset I will be with her.
>>56540918
Because "small government" is now just a buzz word. It only means what idea it evokes in the people who hear it. To the average conservative voter, the only requirements of "small government" are
>lower taxes
>less strict gun laws
>allowing them to keep fags out of their stores
Beyond that, it's irrelevant.
Yes, it's retarded, but as a politician you have to convince retards to vote for you, which requires you to speak their language.
>>56543958
Actually no. Clinton started Iraq and bush gets the credit for.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Iraq_(1998)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Liberation_Act
Because immigrants have political externalities, products don't.
Markets are good.
Racial diversity is bad, particularly bad for markets and libertarian political support.
Create a system that takes these two things into consideration.
Plus, you have no evidence on just how much immigration would occur in a pure libertarian society. Maybe there would be a great deal of selection? Maybe in libertarianism, the private borders would be far more closed than they would be open.
