Would liberals have supported the British confiscating dangerous assault weapons at Lexington and Concord?
>>56529322
Loyalists are how the British were informed about the weapon caches at Concord.
do you even need to ask
>>56529883
I dont know why they need military style muskets when you can hunt with a bow?
>>56529322
>Lexington and Concord
Wow there are locations like that in Fallout 4
>>56529991
In this case the Americans are the radicals and revolutionaries. They are the liberals.
>>56529322
Of course.
>>56530135
>They are the liberals
not by the American definition of the word
>>56529322
muskets are not assault weapons
>>56530474
What is an assault weapon?
>>56529322
The "liberals" would have advocated the following:
>no ebil guns, only the Crown and Magistrates should have guns
>its 1776 mane!
>only territorialist ableists own land..
>those poor indians invaded farms and scalping people dindian nothing!
>higher taxes on tobacco and whiskey
>>56530891
>implying kekservatives wouldnt have advocated for the status quo of being buttraped by their british overlords
>implying kekservatives don't miss being ruled over by a god-king as evidenced by their homoerotic obsession with trump
