TRUMP CONFIRMED FOR GETTING BTFO
RUBIO 2016
get the fuck in here
when did Jeb bush up his shit?
https://betting.betfair.com/politics/us-politics/republican-nomination-odds---donald-trump-shortens-on-betfair-201115-171.html
Republican Nomination: Donald Trump hits shortest odds yet
Trump has literally never been more likely to win.
>Carson and Paul at Romney level
Daaamn son
>>56518144
I wonder who will be the candidate that swoops in and says "listen, alot of what Trump is saying has some truth to it, however, we need to be level-headed when dealing with the issues. We can't go be that extreme in reality. It usually isn't very good for society. Vote for me, and you'll get your voice heard, in a reasonable way." That candidate will steal half of trumps votes and half of the other nominees votes because they are afraid that trump might win if not.
It will happen, because politics isn't a game of chance. It's planned.
>>56518896
Gut feeling says it will be Jeb Bush.
>>56519137
The thing is, if Trump is serious about wanting to be president then he'll have enough influence to make life hell for any of them if he doesn't win.
>>56519137
do they want Hillary to win?
>>56519884
I don't think "they" care if Hillary or Jeb wins. "They" win anyways. And I think Trump is happy as long as the politics favor him in his business and I think that goal is already achieved by becoming the "extreme" protest-vote. It forces the other politicians to adopt some of his rhetoric, even if in milder form.
>>56521294
>undefined "they"
Which they are we talking about? The Rockefellers? The Jews? Wal-mart? Scientology?
>>56519137
Most likely Bush, and will most likely beat Hillary later on. Will come second in Iowa and dominate New Hampshire. If not Bush then only Rubio, and either way it's Fiorina on the ticket to satisfy the quota.
rubio is a fuckboy. ted cruz is more likely to win than him
trump is going to win
>>56521558
I'm not the one who said "they" first. I just hyphened it to show that it was unclear. I'll just call "them" the architects. It's the same people who pay for all the political commercials. Their interests usually will be the same as the interests of Trump.
>>56523766
I'm unsure if that's the "they" our australian friend was referring to, or if he meant republicans by "they". If used in the latter sense it makes less sense, but I've seen worse cognitive dissonance.
