Explain this
>>56506069
Races live in segregation. Most murders are local and between people who know each other. This is why murder is mostly white on white or black on black.
E.g. a black man from Mississippi has no chance of killing some white man in Vermont. **Proximity matters.**
The "Other" group lives probably less segregated, but closer to whites.
Nobody can OP.Dindus should unite actually against whites not kill each other
>>56506069
Now lets see the data where spics aren't counted as white.
>>56506069
Why should I trust a chart where none of the fractions add up to one hundred percent?
14% of victims are beat up so bad that they can't be identified at all and not even any of their skin remains
>>56506497
they add up to 100% horizontally.
>>56506516
No, the share of victims cannot be read here. 14% of murderers in cases where the victims are of unknown race, are of unknown race.
>>56506069
The percent of murders that are intraracial is similar between blacks and whites. However, what these percentages hide is that the number of murders of blacks by blacks is about the same as the number of whites murdered by whites. Given that there are only about 1/7 as many blacks as whites, this means that blacks are about 7 times as likely to kill each other as whites are to kill each other.
So there are really two facts to remember:
1. Blacks are being killed in very large numbers, 7 times as much as whites.
2. It is almost solely blacks who are doing this.
>>56506069
>be collegefag
>sit in econ class
>figured prof at least be impartial if not redpilled
>nope
>"I used to work in Diversity and Inclusion"
>"statistically blacks commit far more crime than any other demographic, but this is because police are simply more inclined to target black suspects"
>"Statistics don't really tell you much."
>he said
>in ECONOMICS
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>56506069
>Data from the FBI
Do you know how to cite your work?
>>56506627
thats what i meant, desu senpai i didnt even read the chart
>>56506069
these numbers are compiled from murders, so, the murderer race is the given one. so it says, "when the race of the murderer is X, the breakdown of victim races is the set {A, B, C, ...}
>>56506069
explain what ? Can't you read ?
>>56506069
Your table is easy to read, but is missing some information.
Suace?
Are those numbers per 1000 people?
>>56506069
Couple more points on this:
1. Blacks complain that they are being killed in large numbers. This is true. But they blame cops and whites, when the real culprits are other blacks. Black Lives Matter is in reality a criticism of blacks if this is taken into consideration.
2. ALSO, the fact that most of this murder is intraracial and that blacks do most of their ultra-violence on each other does not mean it is not a concern for whites. We still have to pay taxes to fund the extra police, courts, and prisons to deal with black violence. Even if blacks and whites all paid their share of taxes, whites would still be paying extra to cover high black crime. But blacks hardly contribute to taxes at all. So they commit the most crime, requiring the most law enforcement, and they pay the least to support this. That's blacks in a nutshell: causing the most problems and doing the least to fix it.
And then on top of that, they try to shift the blame onto everyone else. This is why I hate blacks.
>>56507569
Here are the numbers in raw form:
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime-in-the-u.s.-2014/tables/expanded-homicide-data/expanded_homicide_data_table_6_murder_race_and_sex_of_vicitm_by_race_and_sex_of_offender_2014.xls
>>56507822
That makes 10x more sense
>>56507822
>>56507959
It's literally the same thing
>>56507822
Thanks.
Here's something interesting about the sex of victims of black and white murders. Not sure what to make of it.
It looks like when whites kill, they are only 1.68 times more likely to kill a man than a woman. Whites are nearly equal opportunity killers. But when blacks kill, they are 3.42 times more likely to kill a man than a woman. By far the killing done by blacks is male-on-male.
Also, when a woman is killed, she is 1.67 times more likely to be killed by a white. Given that whites are 7 times more numerous in the population than blacks, this number should be 7, so blacks are still doing quite a bit more than their share of murder of women.
But look at male victims. When a male is murdered, the trend we see for women is reversed, and he is 3.41 times more likely to be killed by a black than a white. This is on top of the fact that blacks are only 1/7 the number of whites. So to get the rate, we multiple 3.41 x 7 to get that the rate by which males are killed by blacks is 23.91 the rate by which they are killed by whites.
>>56508248
it pretty much proves that hispanics are "white" and not "other"
>>56508522
White hispanics and hispanics are too different groups according to them
>>56508506
I need to change that last sentence to:
>So to get the rate, we multiply 3.41 x 7 to get that the rate at which blacks kill males is 23.91 the rate at which whites kill males.
>>56508673
Fuck. That's not right either. Never mind.
>>56507822
187 vs 446
Looking at it from a probabilistic perspective, these numbers should be exactly equal, if there were no racial bias.
Since "Black on White" is twice as large as "White on Black" we can deduce that Whites are less racist than Blacks.
>>56508506
>when whites kill, they are only 1.68 times more likely to kill a man than a woman. Whites are nearly equal opportunity killers. But when blacks kill, they are 3.42 times more likely to kill a man than a woman. By far the killing done by blacks is male-on-male.
Time for quotas
>>56509114
It's Black on Black gang warfare.
>>56509193
gangs are boys' clubs. that is problematic
more women in gangs
>>56506069
>>56507822
>>56508506
People need to quit quoting FBI stats where they lump wetbacks with Whites.
>>56509260
>arrest data
Of course with profiling you would get those numbers, where are the convictions? faggot
>>56509260
That's arrests, not convictions.
>>56506069
Niggers gonna nig
