When BLM talk about how they were ancient Egyptians, why does no one ask them why they used slaves to build the pyramids.
>>56503284
Because that's racist.
>>56503284
They wuz keengz... and sheeeeit. Don't forget about the sheeeeit part, Anon.
>>56503419
> But I thought the Egyptians loved cats where as you hate all living things?
> BLM: SHEEEEEEEEEEIT!
>>56503284
Because they didn't, you fucktard. The pyramids were built mainly ny farmers who didn't have nothing to do in that period of the year and by actual worker.
>>56503550
they were built to hold grain
>>56503284
posting in a bait thread
>>56503284
The picture attached to this post contains the skull of KV55 which is a close relative of Tutankhamen.
It is suggested that the skull belongs to the heretic king Akhnaten or to a brother of Tutankhamen.
The Egyptian Pharaohs practiced inbreeding, which caused prognathism in their facial features.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inbreeding#Royalty_and_nobility
> In ancient Egypt, royal women were believed to carry the bloodlines and so it was advantageous for a pharaoh to marry his sister or half-sister; in such cases a special combination between endogamy and polygamy is found. Normally, the old ruler's eldest son and daughter (who could be either siblings or half-siblings) became the new rulers.
This paper from the US Library of Medicine documents the effects of inbreeding upon facial features, its results show inbreeding seemed to increase the mean values of overjet, overbite, and vertical bite.
> Effect of inbreeding and endogamy on occlusal traits in human isolates.
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14634168
This study of ethnic inbreeding within the Ashkenazim Jewish community explains why they retain distinctiveness.
> Bray, Steven M.; Mulle, Jennifer G.; Dodd, Anne F.; Pulver, Ann E.; Wooding, Stephen; Warren, Stephen T. (2010). "Signatures of founder effects, admixture, and selection in the Ashkenazi Jewish population"
> Ashkenazim distinctiveness comes from their ethnic endogamy (ethnic inbreeding), which allowed them to "mine" their ancestral gene pool in the context of relative reproductive isolation from European neighbors.
>>56503634
A Virtual Autopsy of Tutankhamun shows how inbreeding caused extensive Overbite(Prognathism), which made his face appear more protruded than it should have.
> http://www.news.com.au/technology/science/virtual-autopsy-reveals-pharaoh-tutankhamun-was-the-ugly-outcome-of-incest/story-fnjwl1aw-1227098110286
> It revealed 19-year-old god-emperor of the Egyptians had a prominent overbite. His face was naturally skewed. He had a clubfoot. His hips were malformed. He suffered epilepsy.
>>56503655
> The period from 9000 to 6000 BC has left very little in the way of archaeological evidence. Around 6000 BC, Neolithic settlements appear all over Egypt.[16] Studies based on morphological,[17] genetic,[18][19][20][21][22] and archaeological data[13][23][24][25][26] have attributed these settlements to migrants from the Fertile Crescent in the Near East
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistoric_Egypt#Faiyum_A_culture
pic related
So Hungary had like 30 kings. That means less the 0.0001% of Hungarians ever got to be kings.
In ancient egypt everybody was a king?
>>56503550
Yeah... Ok... Sure....
>mfw people buy into this shit
>>56503698
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_wine#Oldest_Winery_Discovered
> The earliest archaeological evidence of wine production yet found has been at sites in Armenia (c.6100 BC),[1][2][3][4][5] Georgia (c.6000 BC)[6][7][8] and Iran (c.5000 BC).[11]
> Archaeologists also found V. vinifera seeds and vines. Commenting on the importance of the find, McGovern said, "The fact that winemaking was already so well developed in 4000 BC suggests that the technology probably goes back much earlier.
pic related, the most ancient sites for Wine and Oil.
Oil production comes from the Caucasus around 7000 BC
KAAAAAAAAAAAAANGZ
>>56503634
>>56503655
>>56503698
>>56503698
African cattle originated in Middle East, spread to Africa by Eurasians.
pic related is 9,000 year old veneration of Cows from modern Turkey
> http://www.natureasia.com/en/nmiddleeast/article/10.1038/nmiddleeast.2014.89
>>56503722
By 30 i meant those who were of Hungarian origin.
>>56503655
SS + GOMAD
I don't get this bullshit either. Even IF by some magical reason Ancient Egyptians were actually black, only a very small number of them would have been kings and queens. You're probably descended from some poor ass farmer of slave
>>56503937
Even IF all Ancient Egyptians were kings and queens, American slaves came from West Africa. ffs
>>56503937
Every celebrity African American they test comes from either Liberia, Gabon, NIgeria, Cameroon ie. West Africa, none of them are from East Africa.
>>56503883
Thank you Starting stronkman
>>56504025
>>56504033
Facts are racist goy
>>56503584
my college professor debunked that theory.
Because asking them why their ancestors used slaves only plays into their retarded idea that people today can be held accountable for the actions of people hundreds or thousands of years ago.
ANCIENT EGYPTIANS WERE NOT BLACK
Canadian in 3... 2... 1...
>>56503550
I know that you stupid nigger. It's a counter punch to their ridiculous claim
>>56503284
i think you're severely overestimating the amount of WE WUZ KEENGZ that people actually believe
it's more of a meme than an actual ideology
> Domesticated Cats
> http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/04/0408_040408_oldestpetcat.html
> This new find, from the Neolithic village of Shillourokambos, predates early Egyptian art depicting cats by 4,000 years or more.
> predates early Egyptian art depicting cats by 4,000 years
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> The Near Eastern origin of cat domestication
> Driscoll CA, Menotti-Raymond M, Roca AL (2007). "The Near Eastern origin of cat domestication". Science 317 (5837): 519–23. Bibcode:2007Sci...317..519D. doi:10.1126/science.1139518. PMID 17600185
> This discovery, combined with genetic studies, suggests cats were probably domesticated in the Middle East, in the Fertile Crescent around the time of the development of agriculture and then they were brought to Cyprus and Egypt.
> were brought to Cyprus and Egypt.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Egyptian Worship of Domesticated Cats through the goddess Bastet have Eurasian origins
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastet
>>56504154
Razio is a mod/janitor, his trip is used by more than one of them.
>>56504238
What their cats would have look like pic related
>>56504340
what they look like today.
>>56504033
Exactly, American niggers saying they were kings and queens, is tantamount to American Jews saying they were Chinese royalty, because they came from Asia. It's fucking ridiculous.
>>56504210
every race has had kings in the past. why is this agenda being pushed so hard by your employer?
>>56503284
>>56503584
no, they were built as mausoleums to their god-kings and their servants
>>56504477
You mean the ones that sold them off to the white slavers?
>>56504408
North Africa has a native Neanderthal population. Neanderthal populations settled in North Africa and Egypt, there is huge amounts of archaeological evidence of them in the Sahara.
> A 2012 study found that North Africans have a Neanderthal admixture rate lying between that of Eurasians (highest) and Sub-Saharan Africans (lowest).[10] It has also shown a great variation within North Africans themselves, depending primarily on the amount of Eurasian versus sub-Saharan African ancestry.[10] However, there are indications that their Neanderthal admixture is not solely contributed by Eurasian introgression.
> Sánchez-Quinto, F.; Botigué, L.R.; Civit, S.; Arenas, C.; Ávila-Arcos, M.C.; Bustamante, C.D.; et al. (2012). "North African Populations Carry the Signature of Admixture with Neandertals". PLoS ONE 7 (10): e47765. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047765. PMC 3474783. PMID 23082212
>>56504620
Even if they didn't, we KNOW that current North African population has been there since at least the neolithic, so discussing any other origin story is a moot point.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1216069/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11006048
>>56504924
They're a bit out of date with regards to genetics.
Must leave now.
>>56505005
here's the lab reconstruction of Ramses II's mummy
>>56505226
back again,
>>56504486
You're both wrong.
>>56504486
they were temples of initiation
>>56506269
wb, that's his son though, and Ramases II and his family definitely had pretty recent Asiatic ancestry btw
![9355795[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ZuLqfNE.jpg "9355795[1].jpg")
How would one go about making this with a copper chisel?
>>56506678
>>56507027
very slowly
>>56504539
It's funny how those "MUH SLAVERY, PAY REPARATION WHITE MEN" retards forget they were sold by black people in the first place
>>56506985
>definitely
Egypt died after the Old Kingdom, everything after was illegitimate.
I would suggest that the New Kingdom was nearly a different group of peoples juxtaposed against a homogeneous Old Kingdom.
The Meshwesh ruled for quite some time after the Ramses'.
>>56506985
Old Kingdom = Roman republic and Early Empire
Middle-New = Byzantium
>>56503550
We don't even know HOW they were built, ffs. Suggesting we know who built them is just fucking ridiculous. Listening to a bunch of tenured arab quasi-scientists postulating doesn't make you an expert, chum.
Here, I packed you lunch!
>>56507636
>Egypt died after the Old Kingdom
That's absolutely not true, it indeed saw some periods of decline, but to say it "died" is pretty preposterous. Ramses II is one of Egypt's greatest Pharaohs, and he was from the New Kingdom. The fact that he had recent Asiatic ancestry, doesn't mean that he was a foreigner, Egypt had saw waves of migration from the near east throughout its history, it was founded on it, that's where agriculture came from.
Egypt DID get less centralised after the Old Kingdom, so it became more difficult to do nation-wide mega projects like the Giza Pyramids, but still various dynasties managed to leave impressive legacies despite it.
>>56507728
I don't think the Byzantium empire would have survived 2000 years!
>>56508432
>, it was founded on it,
we agree.
Egypt was death cult at best, I only went into it chasing the evil one (pic related), Egypt is the Underworld.
>>56508510
Egypt is an Island in the desert, it is placed in a better position to not be invaded regularly, whereas Byzantium was perma-raided by about a dozen different groups.
>>56507099
"I laughed my face off."
>>56508114
we've known how they were built for a couple years
the blocks were cast. it's how they were so uniform, mathematically or whatever...
i thought everyone knew we put this shit to bed a couple years back...
>>56508691
>Egypt is an Island in the desert
That only remained true until navies were invented. Also the New Kingdom saw Egyptian expansions as far north as the Hittite empire, that's hardly "isolationist".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kadesh
>>56508561
kek
hope that was meant as a joke
>>56509318
The entire history of Egypt can be summed up thus;
Egypt is a Balloon, the Eurasians blown in air, and Egypt expands.
After awhile Egypt deflates, then Eurasians blown in air again, then Egypt expands again.
It was a shame that Egypt couldn't tie a knot on itself, it just deflates again and becomes a Granary.
>>56509385
hey whats Egypt like at the moment? Would i be able to go and enjoy the history or i would i get treated like shit?
>>56509385
No joke, I'm 100% serious.
>>56507027
My utmost apologies for being on my tablet and being unable to bring you the proof here; but if you indulge me: google ancient copper drill and in the images tab, the second picture is the tool they used for that cut.
To describe it: hollow copper rod and the used sand as an abrasive, and like your first response it takes a lot of fucking time and labour.
Mesopotamia was the cradle of civilization as Egypt was the Coffin of Civilization, and the Greeks are the Pallbearers of Civilization.
The way I understand it from sources that I cannot divulge, the jews were the slave traders (managers) who could afford to ship slaves from afrika. The jews hired afrikans to supply the labor and the Egyptians were the owners of the property. DUDE WEED LMAO.
>>56510008
>>56509693
>the Eurasians blown in air
Egypt IS a Eurasian country/civilization, North Africans are all Eurasians (with a little sub-Saharan admixture South of the Sahara). And all nations rise and fall throughout their history (look at a world map pre- and post-WWII, and that's just a one-century-worth of history!), but nothing on the planet has endured as long as Egypt, a country that had remained unified throughout its 5100 history!
>>56509756
Anything but Cairo and Giza would be pretty good to visit now, tourism is in the gutter, so less queues. But again, stay away from Cairo and Giza (i,e, no Pyramids or Cairo Museum).
>>56510305
No doubt Mesopotamia was more advanced than Egypt, though its one deadly sin was it never unified, which made Egypt surpass it in almost every way in terms of achievements. Egypt was the USA and Mesopotamia was Europe.
>Egypt was the Coffin of Civilization
Hardly, that title is more worthy of Rome, that had corrupted all near Eastern civilizations to the point of no return.
>>56511058
Ist /Isis/Iset is the bringer of civilization.
Ishtar is the bringer of civilization.
Isis is the bringer of civilization.
Astarte is the bringer of civilization.
>>56511596
>No doubt Mesopotamia was more advanced than Egypt, though its one deadly sin was it never unified, which made Egypt surpass it in almost every way in terms of achievements. Egypt was the USA and Mesopotamia was Europe.
kek, Egypt got BTFO by wave after wave of Near Eastern peoples.
From the Hyksos to the Persians.
>>56511983
>kek, Egypt got BTFO by wave after wave of Near Eastern peoples.
Egypt BTFO'd them a LOT MORE in return, the consecutive waves only happened by the 3rd intermediate period (nobody had ever occupied the whole of Egypt until that point in history), Dynastic Egypt was already pretty dead by then.
>>56513393
>Egypt BTFO'd them a LOT MORE in return
Where? Ramses didn't defeat the Hittites. Only around Thutmosis III's period did Egypt have successes against the Mitanni and Syrians.
The only reason that the Egyptians were able to create the New Kingdom was due to the Hittites sacking Babylon.
The Hittites created the environment for expansion into the Levant by Egypt.
Were we keengz and sheeeeeit too? ;^)
