Because a lone wolf = a global network of jihadis, right?
Also, he described himself as a "cultural Christian" and "not excessively religious", so his attack was political. Hence why he attacked young political activists.
The leftists are tripping over themselves trying to defend Islam, and vilify Christians.
>>56497060
No, they dont care about the motive.
>killing people in the NAME of islam while under the influence of being a muslim
>killing people FOR A POLITICAL REASON while under the influence of being white
they are retarded, somehow motive doesnt matter
>>56497060
The libtards think that skin color has a special resonance that makes all of us telepathically linked.
>>56497134
They'll invent a religious motive for white people (Breivik, McVeigh, ...), but they'll completely downplay the actual religious motive of Muslims.
>>56497060
All these "white terrorists" the left rambles on about are just lone nuts who didn't know how to control their anger at the world. Essentially they just snap
Islamic extremists however do it out of pure belief and principle. Their whole purpose in life is to kill nonbelievers.
>>56497210
Muslims mostly pull that shit off IN THE NAME OF THE RELIGION!
while people like breivik just happened to be christians who pulled something off
>>56497221
The main difference is that Christianity condemns violent acts like this, while Islam condones and validates them.
>>56497060
He also didn't cite his religion or stated that religion was the motivation for his action at all. He specficially stated that it was nationalism.
Islam terrorist specifically said they are doing it for allah and follow the quran. Numerous sect of islamic terrorist in different region of the worlds all do the same thing.
>>56497221
>All these "white terrorists" the left rambles on about are just lone nuts who didn't know how to control their anger at the world.
You fail Amerifag... Breivik is a hero and should be hailed as such...
>>56497060
I remember this spic on /pol/ used to literally worship breivik and send him letters and shit.
>>56497396
>The main difference is that Christianity condemns violent acts like this, while Islam condones and validates them.
Implying the Utoya Socialists didn't deserve to die... That they're just like everyone else and dindu nuffin...
>>56497396
Islam condemns them too, and Christianity calls for violence too.
They both have an insane amount of contradiction, calling you to kill the unbeliever in one, and condemning it in another paragraph
>still believing in abrahamic-jewish lies
>>56497727
>Christianity calls for violence too
There isn't a word of violence in the new testament.
Which is what makes Christians Christians.
>>56497060
Literally libkek logic, disregard those retards mate.
>>56497367
I dunno, Breivik really went full Knight Templar with his manifesto
Though that might have been to divert attantion from... other things.
>>56497799
Read the OP, he described himself as a "cultural Christian" and "not excessively religious".
>>56497766
>There isn't a word of violence in the new testament.
Implying this is something to be proud of...
Yeah so less than half of the killed were below 18. Only a few below 17.
>>56497727
I think you have a shithead.
>>56497766
The only thing that makes christians normal is that all we have in Europe are white. Take black African christians, they are equal shit as their muslim counterparts. Or take our white muslims, behaving like any other white person.
It is a question of race too. The white people, as a more developed race than arabs and negros have far far better dispositions to be civilised and normal.
>>56497820
At least our holy book is morally superior to the Quran.
>>56497883
I wouldn't say that.
A lot of the Christian violence is a direct response to Muslim attacks.
>>56497942
>A lot of the Christian violence is a direct response to Muslim attacks.
Never make excuses, never make apologies - when you do you discount in embedding in the mind of the left the truth that they genuinely deserve the terror of their fellow citizens for their treachery against the west. You had nothing to do with Breivik's attacks and he is not particularly religious - but like many more secular rightists - he is in favor of maintaining western culture.
>>56497942
Why do christians disregard the old testament so easily?
It's the most intense desu senpai.
Breivik, that famous member of the Norwegian Nationalist Movement
>>56498127
I fully support Christians defending themselves against Muslims.
>>56498156
Because Jesus himself shits all over the old testament numerous times.
Working on the Sabbath, preventing an adulterous woman from being stoned, literally replacing the 10 commandments with 1 commandment: to love others as you love yourself, etc.
The OT is there for reference only, and don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
>>56497727
>Islam condemns them too
You mean celebrates? I've literally never seen a single Islamic religious or political leader condemn a single Muslim terrorist attack or swear solidarity with the victims. All they do is protest their own innocence.
>and Christianity calls for violence too
Show me where Jesus called for war against the nonbelievers.
>>56497060
He attacked and killed innocent people.
If he did it against a army, I would be all for it. But he was a fucking faggy coward pussy. So fuck him.
>this thread
>not sure if /pol/ is ironic or thinks Islam is the only religion with a history of violence
>>56498267
>DAD COME ON! STONING WHORES? IT'S 32 A.D.!
>>56498449
It's not like he condoned what the woman did, he told her not to do it anymore.
He just prevented her from receiving corporal punishment.
You know, the kind of punishment literally prescribed by the Quran?
>>56498342
Hilariously enough, al quaeda and another terrorist organization condemned the attacks.
The fuck is going on in the world when the only people who apologize for and condemn this shit are motherfucking terrorists
>>56498817
It's literally jealousy.
>>56497060
Breivik was a nationalist that attacked a political party because of their lame restriction on a culture and religion he deemed destructive.
>>56497060
Different thing is different. But not if they can twist it to fit their narrative. The fact that there will be more like him thanks to their sponsored invasion is lost on them.
>>56497060
he also didnt fucking bomb some buses in london
