Why do liberals support and defend the religion/culture that is the most blatantly oppressive and violent towards women?
>>55931136
Because it's not about women, it's about bringing down white Christian males.
>>55931136
Because liberals take everything on its face value and don't think more than a few steps into a problem.
Liberalism isn't based on logic anymore. It's based on a shared sense of "oppression".
Same reason why liberals support feminists who say gender is a social construct, as well as trannies who say they were born in a different gender.
>>55931136
They are unintelligent and their beliefs/thought process relies on cognitive dissonance
>>55931136
Because liberals are mentally retarded.
There is a minority of intellectual pacifists whose real though unadmitted motive appears to be hatred of western democracy and admiration of totalitarianism. Pacifist propaganda usually boils down to saying that one side is as bad as the other, but if one looks closely at the writings of younger intellectual pacifists, one finds that they do not by any means express impartial disapproval but are directed almost entirely against Britain and the United States. Moreover they do not as a rule condemn violence as such, but only violence used in defence of western countries.
The old-style contemptuous attitude towards ‘natives’ has been much weakened in England, and various pseudo-scientific theories emphasising the superiority of the white race have been abandoned. Among the intelligentsia, colour feeling only occurs in the transposed form, that is, as a belief in the innate superiority of the coloured races. This is now increasingly common among English intellectuals, probably resulting more often from masochism and sexual frustration than from contact with the Oriental and Negro nationalist movements. Even among those who do not feel strongly on the colour question, snobbery and imitation have a powerful influence. Almost any English intellectual would be scandalised by the claim that the white races are superior to the coloured, whereas the opposite claim would seem to him unexceptionable even if he disagreed with it. Nationalistic attachment to the coloured races is usually mixed up with the belief that their sex lives are superior, and there is a large underground mythology about the sexual prowess of Negroes.
Orwell 1945
>We can't tolerate intolerance
>We need more muslim immigration
Why don't they pick one and only one?
i am violently against women too .. where is the problem? i am a typical redneck ... weapons, beer and cars for life!!
>>55931136
They dont, only a small minority do
Its the jew media that makes it look like theres way more support for it than there really is
>>55931340
This. Liberals don't genuinely care about 90% of what they fight for, they're just in it for the sense of moral superiority. They'd never die for their "beliefs."
>>55931136
Hi anon I didn't see your post but I ask the same question
>>55933293
>>55931136
because liberalism is a mental disorder
>>55931136
Liberals are massive hypocrites. They cannot defend their positions without resorting to fallacious arguments, their weapon is emotion.
This is why it is necessary to combat them with rhetoric.
>>55931136
Because Orwell-tier doublethink. They are against the violation of women's rights, but they're also against 'islamophobia'. It doesn't occur to them they're two sides of the same medal. Besides, you know what year it is
