How would a Libertarian president respond to the Paris attacks?
Open the borders and let in every muslim on earth.
because borders are just imaginary goy :^)
>>55927651
he would send his soldiers to capture isis and then sell them as slaves
>>55927651
>How would a Libertarian president respond to the Paris attacks?
This is a really complex question and you won't find the answer on /pol/.
It is kind of a trick question in that if a Libertarian were president it is unlikely there would be any policies in place which instigate such attacks (foreign meddling, embargoes, bombing, etc).
>>55927651
Announce nationwide firearm discounts
This is kind of relevant
https://mises.org/library/open-borders-are-assault-private-property
>>55927800
>libertarians adamantly pro-private property
>In a libertarian country, everything would be privately owned
>somehow libertarians are against borders
check m8
The free market will solve terrorism somehow
during a terrorist attack, if there's a market for anti-terrorist businesses, they will emerge maybe
Nothing, like how they would handle everything.
The population being armed would be the main priority. As for institutional response, it depends on what kind of Libertarian you're talking about. Responses range from stepping up policing, to private organizations condemning and discriminating against muslims through free association (refusing to employ or trade with) all the way to allowing private sipute respolution firms to deal with it.
As I said though, arming the population and training them is the best option. Imagine if one of those 150 people had a gun and basic training.
>>55929042
this PMC's would have a field day
Hire the Diamond Doges.
>>55928998
Libertarians want healthcare, roads, police, military, courts, prisons, and mines to be publically owned. We just want less red tape.
>blowing up public property
>a crime
Isis are true freedom fighters
>>55928998
They are against borders
>but I'm a libertarian and I'm for borders
That's nice. It's a meaningless sentiment
>>55929386
... wut da fuk kind of libertarianism have you been smoking?
Libertarians are for the privatization of all government functions, effectively making government a for-profit enterprise or family-owned aristocracy.
>>55930007
You're conflating anarchism with libertarian minarchism. If the government provides no services, or at least doesn't tax and violently monopolize its position in the market, it becomes just another private service provider competing on the open market, and the resultant society is an anarchist one. In the most common formulation of libertarianism, the government monopolizes the court system, law enforcement, and military services.
>>55929386
>healthcare, roads, mines
These are not commonly demanded to be nationalized by most libertarians.
