https://randpaul.com/news/sen-rand-paul-introduces-legislation-to-prevent-terrorists-from-entering-the-us-as-refugees
>Rand Paul introducing bill to stop terrorists from coming in as refugees
Remember to stand with Rand. He's our only hope.
>>55923363
He did this before and dems+rubio n rinos stopped it
>>55923667
They won't now that all the news is on refugees.
>>55923363
Reminder to all Trumpfags that only Rand actively opposes shit like the Patriot act while Trump is content to let mass surveillance continue with the usual "terrorists" excuse.
Do it, Randall!
STAND
Is the iFunny watermark a meme I missed out on?
He's still a niggerlover but maybe he's not total shit
CANT STRAND
PAUL/TRUMP ANTIWAR ANTIMUDLSIME TICKET WHEN
>>55923363
>>Rand Paul proposes legislation that cannot be enforced and doesn't make any sense. It's based on the logic that criminals don't adapt.
Rand still wants those donations, free moneys i see.
>>55924563
Trumpfag detected
Stand with Rand
>>55923363
I STAND WITH RAND SO BASED
BASED RAND PAUL
IM READY FOR DEREGULATION OF THE 2ND AMENDMENT
IM READY FOR AN AUDIT OF THE FED
IM READY FOR SMALL GOVERNMENT
IM READY FOR ECONOMIC PROSPERITY
RAND TAKE ME ON THIS TABLE RIGHT HERE RIGHT NOW
>Rand Paul
>libertarian
Choose one. Rand is proving he's just another statist, authoritarian politician.
>>55924174
Reminder to randlets that only Trump will build a wall
>>55924959
Lol, I like how he's taller than everyone....
>randlets eating up rand "the crotch haired" paul's rhetoric
They already vet for terrorists, dumbasses.
>>55925028
If you actually wanted small government, you wouldn't vote for Rand.
>>55924891
i would suck the shit out of tori nonakas ass. no joke
>>55925125
Who are you voting for?
>>55925039
He isn't libertarian. He's just the closest we get to a libertarian.
>>55925116
And yet we've let some in already.
Personally I want to see the text of the bill. Probably the only way to cut down on terrorists sneaking in is to only allow full families. As in, a man, his wife, and their child/children.
>>55925240
hes gonna say trump
>>55923363
This country can barely keep 2000 pound stockpiles of marijuana and cocaine out, we're gonna keep out refugees? Because it'll be a "law"?
>Oh happy day. Thanks, Rand!
>>55925240
The Libertarian Party.
>>55923363
RAND IS EVERYWHERE
>NO TERRORISTS
>KILL THE FEDERAL RESERVE
>KILL THE PATRIOT ACT
How is one man so busy?
Why dont i ever hear about him on news
>>55925380
Oh so you're voting for Rand cool
>>55925380
you might as well vote for bernie sanders you fucking autist.
untill the libertarian party can get a legit candidate into the presidential race voting for them is a waste of a vote and therefor helping the socialists win the election.
>>55925380
gotta love throwing your vote away :^)
>>55923363
Get the fuck out of here and stop posting Jew Paul
We don't want him and no amount of schilling on your end is going to change that
>>55925544
Is that you Romney?
>>55925425
>RAND IS EVERYWHERE
Rand is flapping his wings to retain his shit tier status.
>can't get 5% nationally
>cries for equality when he gets a broom closet at RNC event
>>55925602
Haha Trumpfag
>>55925544
All the Republican candidates are big-government socialists.
>>55925602
>Jew
Trump- "I can save Israel. I love Israel. Israel will last forever under my watch."
Trump also has a Jewish daughter.
Rand wants to refund the kikes.
Stand with Rand, or go g>>55925607
et chumped
>>55925655
lol implying american people actually want freedom.
the country is politically sucidal.
the fact that no one is paying attention to him and the media is snuffing him out is symbolic of how important he is.
>>55925789
How is rand a socialist?
>>55925380
I voted (L) in 2000,2004,2008,2012 and might just do so in 2016
I do it as a matter of principle. I wish the party could get it's shit together and at least land a few congressional seats. That's where it has to start. But, *sigh* they're seemingly satisfied with dog catchers, zoning board members, mayoral offices in towns with populations of 47
When the Harry Browne died, the Libertarian Party died.
Also, when Bob Barr was the nominee, well, that didn't help either.
>>55925888
hes not. dont take the bait
>>55924891
Rand's shoe laces
>just one of the girls
>>55926349
stale b8 m8
>>55923363
SIGN RANDS PETITION.
https://randpaul.com/f/oppose-dangerous-refugees
>>55926496
Signed. But then it asked me for money instead of telling me how many other people signed it.
I know the guy needs money. I'm sure he could find a volunteer to do better PR than that.
RAND SHOULD NEVER HAVE ATTACKED TRUMP
HE SHOT HIMSELF IN THE GUT AND WE'VE BEEN WATCHING HIM BLEED OUT EVER SINCE
HE SHOULD HAVE POSITIONED HIMSELF AS A CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTARIAN CHECK ON TRUMP'S RHETORIC.
I'VE NEVER UNDERSTOOD RAND'S GAME PLAN.
RAND FAILED US
>still thinks randlet is legit
>>55926829
Yeah, Rand attacking trump in the first debate was a fucking terrible move. Why did he bother to continue doing it? Attacking or insulting Trump is just a waste of time, and ends up giving him more popularity, since he always has something hilarious to say about it.
>>55925039
>>55925028
He can open the door to Libertarian policies , we have to break the current conditioning that big gov is ok little by little by bringing on the Rand man friend
>>55927157
True
It is imperative that Rand Paul immediately turn his focus toward retaining his Senate seat.
We need him there in the Senate. He can do more good there than he can campaign for the Presidency with 3% in the polls.
Even Trump is saying that lately. I think President Trump would like to have a Senator Rand Paul to work with on his legislative agenda.
Trump's my 2nd pick from the GOP shitshow, but Rand is a man of actual policy and consistent, constitutional convictions. If only the dank may mays were on his side.
>>55923363
He literally advocates amnesty for 30 million illegals, who will almost all vote democrap, thus ensuring the reps will never win again, and furthering the Jews goal of White Genocide
http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Rand_Paul_Immigration.htm
>Republicans need to become parents of a new future with Latino voters or we will need to resign ourselves to permanent minority status. The Republican Party has insisted for years that we stand for freedom and family values. I am most proud of my party when it stands for both. The vast majority of Latino voters agree with us on these issues but Republicans have pushed them away with harsh rhetoric over immigration.
>We are the party that embraces hard work and ingenuity, therefore we must be the party that embraces the immigrant who wants to come to America for a better future. We must be the party who sees immigrants as assets, not liabilities. We must be the party that says, "If you want to work, if you want to become an American, we welcome you."
he's AntiWhite, inb4 stormfag
I feel bad for Rand. He's one of the most solid candidates and seems to care about America, but he's still not doing very well. He and Carson should switch places.
so infantile
>>55927455
Rand has no need to focus on his senate race, even if he doesn't get nomination he'll win his senate race easily.
>>55925827
very poor post, what a loser
>>55927659
>He and Carson should switch places.
weenie not want Black Pres #2
>>55927702
Never assume
The DNC could drop a lot of money on the race if they think they can upset him.
Right now, he's wasting his donors generosity on the presidential bid.
He'll need that money for the Senate seat down the road.
>>55927655
>I do not support amnesty, but rather I support a legal immigration process. I recognize that our country has been enriched by those who seek the American Dream and have a desire for a better life. However, millions of illegal immigrants are crossing our border without our knowledge, and this threatens our national security.
>As President, I would secure our border immediately. Before issuing any visas or starting the legal immigration process, we must first ensure that our border is secure.
>While serving in the Senate, I introduced legislation that would make immigration reform conditional on Congress voting on whether the border is secure, requiring completion of a border fence in five years and a protection against the federal government establishing a national identification card system for citizens.
SIGN RANDS PETITION.
>>55927956
>giving out my name, email and address
Hell no
Rand has no need to focus
giving out my name, email and address
Homeland Security has Rand on a watch list
>>55928115
Then just send letters to all the state and federal representatives and senators. You only have to give your name and address that way.
I do it all the time. Most never write back. But sometimes I get a form letter on expensive taxpayer-funded letterhead that makes it look all impressive.
Or just call up the offices. You don't even have to give away any of your information. You'll talk to some flunky staffer and he/she will tick off your opinion on column A or column B if you're lucky.
>>55923363
STAND WITH RAND
GET A VISA YOU KEBAB FUCKS
>>55927954
>We are the party that embraces hard work and ingenuity, therefore we must be the party that embraces the immigrant who wants to come to America for a better future. We must be the party who sees immigrants as assets, not liabilities. We must be the party that says, "If you want to work, if you want to become an American, we welcome you."
>Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky is endorsing a pathway to citizenship for the nation's 11 million illegal immigrants. In a speech, the potential 2016 presidential candidate declares, "If you wish to live and work in America, then we will find a place for you."
>Q: Does a "pathway to citizenship" mean amnesty in your book?
PAUL: I think that that's the whole point: What is amnesty? Because, [for those who say] "no deportation and no amnesty," well, if you're not going to deport people you are somehow changing the current law because the current law says everybody must go.
Q: But you've said that the party should give up this word "amnesty"?
PAUL: I think we need to get beyond it. We need some form of immigration reform.
Q: And a path to citizenship?
PAUL: Well, the path to citizenship is a longer, more difficult goal.
you're having a hard time tonight
>>55928121
that pic
>>55927659
He's pretty down on his luck these days.
>>55925039
He's libertarian, he just can't show it off that much because he needs to get on the Republican ticket to have a chance. He already stated his desire to legalize drugs, cut taxes, make government so small you can't see it and NSA btfo. He may not be as hardcore as his dad, but if anything he will bring in some new libertarian policies and set the stage.
>>55928121
he should use this to promote his campaign kek
>>55927806
>we will have a ROLL in the platform
cmon benny boy
>>55928933
full on Jew controlled
UNSTALLABLE PAUL STRIKES AGAIN
JOIN #ProjectPaul ON KIK
Is this the guy who thinks that the gov building roads = slavery?
>>55930148
>KIK
nig vote incoming
>>55925425
Because he's a threat. He states the truth and gives solutions. Corporate mainstream media doesn't want him to come in and wake up the American people, he wants them to stay ignorant.
It's a problem with a lot of actually good candidates we get, from both parties. Mainstream media cuts them off and the American population are too lazy to actually look up information on the people running.
>>55923363
I STAND WITH RAND!
>>55930775
yer a faggit harry, a faggit!
why do you support White Genocide?
>>55923363
how this would actually work:
>are you a terrorist
>n-no, of course not! allahackbar!
>OK then, come right in, friend :^)
>>55926829
>I'VE NEVER UNDERSTOOD RAND'S GAME PLAN.
The best is yet to come
>>55929586
what are his current poll numbers?
>>55923363
Daily reminder trump will send home all refugees and not let them in. Better than manlet rand
if there are any randlet internfags itt, pass this on and he might get some votes:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flag.htm
The flags displayed in State courts and courts of the United States have gold or yellow fringes. That is your WARNING that you are entering into a foreign enclave, the same as if you are stepping into a foreign embassy and you will be under the jurisdiction of that flag. The flag with the gold or yellow fringe has no constitution, no laws, and no rules of court, and is not recognized by any nation on the earth, and is foreign to you and the United States of America. more information
MILITARY FLAG WITH THE GOLD FRINGE
Martial Law Flag "Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides. The President of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military. The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy." 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 83.
President, Dwight David Eisenhower, by Executive Order No.10834, signed on August 21, 1959 and printed in the Federal Register at 24 F.R. 6865, pursuant to law, stated that: "A military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a yellow fringe border on three sides."
THE LAW OF THE FLAG
The Law of the Flag, an International Law, which is recognized by every nation of the planet, is defined as:
"... a rule to the effect that a vessel is a part of the territory of the nation whose flag she flies. The term is used to designate the RIGHTS under which a ship owner, who sends his vessel into a foreign port, gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the ship master that he intends the Law of that Flag to regulate those contracts, and that they must either submit to its operation or not contract with him or his agent at all." Ref.: Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41
By the doctrine of "four cornering" the flag establishes the law of the country that it represents. For example, the embassies of foreign countries, in Washington D.C., are "four cornered" by walls or fencing, creating an "enclave." Within the boundaries of the "enclave" of the foreign embassy, the flag of that foreign country establishes the jurisdiction and law of that foreign country, which will be enforced by the Law of the Flag and international treaty. If you enter an embassy, you will be subject to the laws of that country, just as if you board a ship flying a foreign flag, you will be subject to the laws of that flag, enforceable by the "master of the ship," (Captain), by the law of the flag.
When you enter a courtroom displaying a gold or yellow fringed flag, you have just entered into a foreign country, and you better have your passport with you, because you may not be coming back to the land of the free for a long time. The judge sitting under a gold or yellow fringe flag becomes the "captain" or "master" of that ship or enclave and he has absolute power to make the rules as he goes. The gold or yellow fringe flag is your warning that you are leaving your Constitutionally secured RIGHTS on the floor outside the door to that courtroom.
>>55923667
Cant wait for the next debate so Paul can wipe the floor with Boy Scout Rubio.
>>55925115
Untrue, Paul is for a wall and has an A from numbersUSA.
This is exactly why so many judges are appointed, and not elected by the people. The Federal judges are appointed by the President, the national military commander in chief. The State judges are appointed by the Governors, the state military commanders. The judges are appointed because the courts are military courts and civilians do not "elect" military officers.
Under martial law, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
The gold-fringed flag only stands inside military courts that sit in summary court martial proceedings against civilians and such courts are governed in part by local rules, but more especially by "The Manual of Courts Martial", U.S., 1994 Ed., at Art. 99, (c)(1)(b), pg. IV-34, PIN 030567-0000, U.S. Government Printing Office, Wash. D.C. The details of the crimes that civilians can commit, that are classed as 'Acts of War,' cover 125 pages in the Manual of Courts Martial.
Under Article IV, section 3, of the Constitution for the united States of America, no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State. So -- Why have the judges of the State and Federal courts been allowed to erect foreign enclaves within our public courthouses under a foreign flag with the yellow fringe upon the soil of your state?
>>55930339
This.
RAND
>legislation that would suspend visa issuance for countries with a high risk of terrorism and impose a waiting period for background checks on visa issuance from other countries until the American people can be assured terrorists cannot enter the country through our immigration and visa system.
OBAMA
>The Obama administration is moving to increase and accelerate the number of Syrian refugees who might be admitted into the United States by opening new screening outposts in Iraq and Lebanon
Which one seems more sensible? The slow, careful, and methodical approach or the Democrat one?
>>55926133
>>55926349
>you're candidate supports israel
>no, you're candidate supports israel
>no, you're candidate supports israel
>no, you're candidate supports israel
>no, you're candidate supports israel
>you're candidate supports israel
>no, you're candidate supports israel
>no, you're candidate supports israel
repeat till israel no longer exists
>>55933682
how about NO visas for any MUDSLIMES?
We just thought you would like to know, so that the next time you see this yellow fringed flag you will know what you are looking at and what it really means. If you are in Spain and you see the National Flag of Spain, you would know that you are under the jurisdiction of Spain; and their laws govern you at this time. You are officially NOTICED when you see their flag. This is an admiralty law that says that all who see this flag understand they are governed by the laws of the country that this flag represents. You SHOULD understand that the gold or yellow fringed flag signifies the same thing. It is a notice to you that you are under the rules and regulations of the military force that is flying that flag.
Are you familiar with martial law?
Does your attorney understand what this flag means?
"It is an elementary rule of pleading, that a plea to the jurisdiction is a tacit (silent) admission that the court has a right to judge the case and is a waiver to all exception to the jurisdiction."(Girty v. Logan, 6 Bush KY, 8)
http://www.title4flags.com/flags.htm
Yellow Fringed Admiralty Flag
http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&cs=iso-8859-1&q=Yellow+Fringed+Admiralty+Flag&_sb_lang=en
Fringe On The U.S. Flag What Does It Mean?
http://user.icx.net/~drherb/fringe.html
United States Executive Order 10834
http://fotw.vexillum.com/flags/us-exord.html
I would like to bring up a most important point regarding the application of Admiralty Law against the American people.
An example is the below case. Others occur on a daily basis throughout the United States with every seizure of property without the property owner being charged in any crime. Rather they "charge" the property with the crime and seize the property.
Here is the point. The application of Admiralty Law against the People was one of the main causes of the Revolutionary War. The Founders were adamant in their opposition to this practice and there was never any provision for this oppression allowed in the Constitution.
Rather, just the opposite is evidenced by three documents. The Declaration of Independence was actually the third Declaration issued by the Founders. The Declaration of Independence culminated the frustrations of the Colonies because Great Britian ignored the pleas to correct the injustices listed in the 2 earlier Declarations. AND BOTH LISTED THE APPLICATION OF ADMIRALTY LAW AGAINST THE PEOPLE AS A GRIEVANCE!
The first Declaration was the, "DECLARATION AND RESOLVES OF THE FIRST
CONTINENTAL CONGRESS," October 14,1774.
I wish to underscore the significance of placing this grievance in the FIRST paragraph of this declaration of grievances. In the FIRST paragraph, our Founding Fathers stated:
"Whereas, since the close of the last war, the British parliament, claiming a power, of right, to bind the people of America by statutes in all cases whatsoever, hath, in some acts, expressly imposed taxes on them, and in others, under various pretences, but in fact for the purpose of raising a revenue, hath imposed rates and duties payable in these colonies, established a board, with unconstitutional powers, and extended the jurisdiction of courts of admiralty, not only for collecting the said duties , but for the trial of causes merely arising within the
body of a county."
NOTES: The "last war" they are referring to is the "French and Indian War." Please notice the Founder's objection to the extension of Courts of Admiralty. These Courts were to operate on the high seas, and to serve as collectors for duties on imported goods or fees associated with ships as well as administering the "Prize Courts" (the seizure of property). These courts, however, were not supposed to be applied on land against the people. On land, the People were to be served by "Common Law." They were never supposed to be used "for the trial of causes merely arising within the body of a county."
>>55925148
meh
Great Britian ignored the first declaration, and so the following year, the Founders went on to again bring up this grievance in the second declaration issued on July 6, 1775. This Declaration is known as, "THE DECLARATION OF THE CAUSES AND NECESSITY OF TAKING UP ARMS."
In this declaration the Founders state:
"These devoted colonies were judged to be in such a state, as to present victories without bloodshed, and all the easy emoluments of statuteable plunder." (MY NOTE: Please understand the preceeding sentence. Today is a carbon copy repeat of this philosphy of government)
"The uninterrupted tenor of their peaceable and respectful behaviour from the beginning of colonization, their dutiful, zealous, and useful services during the war, though so recently and amply acknowledged in the most honourable manner by his majesty, by the late king, and by parliament, could not save them from the meditated innovations.
Parliament was influenced to adopt the pernicious project, and assuming a new power over them, have in the course of eleven years, given such decisive specimens of the spirit and consequences attending this power, as to leave no doubt concerning the effects of acquiescence under it.
They have undertaken to give and grant our money without our consent, though we have ever exercised an exclusive right to dispose of our own property; statutes have been passed for extending the jurisdiction of courts of admiralty and vice-admiralty beyond their ancient limits; for depriving us of the accustomed and inestimable priviledge of trial by jury, in cases affecting both life and property; for suspending the legislature of one of the colonies; for interdicting all commerce to the capital of another; and for altering fundamentally the form of
government established by charter, and secured by acts of its own legislature solemnly confirmed by the crown; for exempting the 'murderers' of colonists from legal trial, and in effect, from punishment; for erecting in a neighbouring province, acquired by the joint arms of Great-Britain and America, a despotism dangerous to our very existence; and for quartering soldiers upon the colonists in time of profound peace. It has also been resolved in parliament, that colonists charged with committing certain offences shall be transported to England to be tried. But why should we enumerate our injuries in detail? By one statute it is declared, that parliament can of right make laws to bind us in all cases what so ever. What is to defend us against so enormous so unlimited a power?"
Please once again notice the position in their list of grievances where the Founders place this policy of "...extending the jurisdiction of courts of admiralty ...." They placed this grievance BEFORE objecting to not having a trial by jury, BEFORE the suspension of one of the legislatures of one of the Colonies (equal to suspending the legislature of one of our States), BEFORE their complaint of the central government (Great Britain) changing the very system of our government, and even BEFORE complaining that the central government was "...exempting the 'murderers' of colonists from legal trial...!"
>>55923363
Not only does Paul say good stuff, he has a record to prove it. You know he has a vastly superior understanding to the issues than the talking points of the other candidates.
>>55925991
Run for office then faggot
Best of both worlds where Paul and Trump run together when?
>>55936357
why would trump hire a manlet for 2nd in command?
#notgonnahappenrandlets
>>55936442
I don't understand what his height has to do with anything when he's made out of Freedom.
Both him and Trump embody parts of the American Spirit and should stick together.
>>55925039
do u even politics brah
>>55936703
>Rand
>embody parts of the American Spirit
He lives off the tax payer, begs for donations and free air time... that's the "American Spirit"?
Indeed, the Founders strenously objected to applying Admiralty Law against the people! The third proof is found in the Constitution itself, in the Bill of Rights. The Fourth Amendment guarantees, "The Right of the People to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; ...."
And the 5th Amendment states, "No person shall...be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of Law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."
Just what kind of Law does the Constitution refer to, when it speaks of the
people being subjected to?
The 7th Amendment gives that answer.
It says, "In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed 20 dollars, the Right of trial by jury shall be preserved; and no fact, tried by a jury shall be reexamined in any Court of the United States than according to the rules of the Common Law."
Please note it does not leave any wiggle room. The Law we are to be subjected to in any controversy exceeding 20 dollars is the Common Law! NOT ADMIRALTY LAW!
And, YES!, this abridgement of our Liberties is as serious today as it was in 1775!
>>55923363
get rand to recognise >>55937239
and you might get some support
>>55937014
>He lives off the tax payer, begs for donations and free air time... that's the "American Spirit"?
#rekt
>>55936442
more #rekt
also, rand should say something about Islame NOT being a religion of peace, but a deathcult
or is he too PC?
but then he is completely PC conservac uck
I'll let you go now
oops
>>55925115
I fucking hate that Trump seems to dislike Rand. My dream ticket would be president Trump and vp Rand. I think they would actually balance each other out.
>>55923363
Bump
>>55943750
rand attacked him first, what do you expect?
>>55939953
That would just totally isolate him.
Wahhabism and Salafism are death cults, Islam itself isn't. It's not the religion of peace either though.
>>55944428
have you read the Quran dude?
if not, where do you get your opinion from cunt?
>>55944428
no response crocfaggit?
>>55944428
have a look at this
http://wikiislam.net/wiki/List_of_Killings_Ordered_or_Supported_by_Muhammad
>>55944428
I'll assume you are withdrawing that statement then you absolute idiot drongo faggot!
bump of disgust in rand
nother bump in disgust of all the jew pawn cu ckservatives, hail emporer trump
bump of surprise and alarm
ok, getting a bit board
>>55924174
reminder that Trump opposed refugees in america months ago while Rand was looking for shoe lifts online.
>>55943750
if Rand went the Cruz route and didn't attack Trump he'd probably have a chance at that, or at least not be attacked by trump
>>55928749
>strawman
Keep picking at them, might end up regaining america one day, maybe after you become the caliphate of the bong islands
>>55950867
sorry, I don't speak spanglish
but since I did understand the word strawman, have some vids
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME7K6P7hlko
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sArXw6ajNg
even wallbuilders should be freemen!
>>55950448
none of them would be talking about immigration or illegals, and their crime if not for trump
>>55923363
Too late faggot.
>>55950805
rand was just doing what his puppetmasters wanted
>>55923363
he fizzled out like a bitch.
ᵀʰᶦˢ ᵖᵒˢᵗ ʷᵃˢ ˢᵖᵒᶰˢᵒʳᵉᵈ ᵇʸ ᴹᶦᶜʳᵒˢᵒᶠᵗ'ˢ ᵂᶦᶰᵈᵒʷˢ 10™
>>55923363
STAND WITH RAND
>>55952206
attack tremp, get stemped
>>55952812
hey, that rhymes, well done faggot
this whole thread is just embarassing
>>55953252
CAN'T STUMP THE TRUMP XD
>>55955466
so triggered reeeeeeeee
ᵀʰᶦˢ ᵖᵒˢᵗ ʷᵃˢ ˢᵖᵒᶰˢᵒʳᵉᵈ ᵇʸ ᴹᶦᶜʳᵒˢᵒᶠᵗ'ˢ ᵂᶦᶰᵈᵒʷˢ 10™
>>55954945
>>55954945
This whole thread is one desperately poor Trump shill or trolling autist >>55953252
>>55952874
>>55952115
>>55949870
>>55949014
>>55948372
>>55944531
>>55945333
>>55943704
>>55942346
>>55941208
>>55939953
>>55938916
>>55937891
>>55937486
>>55937239
>>55935728
>>55935370
>>55934739
>>55934255
>>55933896
>>55933856
>>55933634
>>55933332
>>55933003
>>55932643
>>55932093
>>55930936
>>55930469
>>55930021
>>55928749
>>55927772
>>55927702
>>55927655>>55955538
>>55955538
You've been shitposting in a rand thread for 5 hours champ
Pretty pathetic 2bh
>>55955655
well done for having an opinion retard
do you disagree with what I wrote?
how long did you spend quoting all my posts? kek
did you read them too?
>>55925148
Still can't believe he cheated on Jessie for her...hope jail or whatever he ended up in was worth it.
>Jessie is love
>Jessie is life
>Tori is one-nighter
>>55955808
i-i-i've done o-other stuff t-too
has it really been 5 hours? what am I doing with my life?
got to get the message about admirality law and rands pro-amnesty stance out though you wanna be aussie cunt
>>55955808
I did watch our nige give a rousing speech though too
better go to bed, 3 in the am now
final contriboot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWBThHr3c0I
>>55923363
God, we need this man as our President. We are running out of time to save the Republic.
ITT
>>55923363
>Background checks on guns are ineffective and a waste of government resouces
>BUT THEY TOTALLY WORK FOR TERRORISTS THOUGH GUISE
Literally what the fuck Rand
>>55923363
Fuck Rand stop refugees full stop. Like Trump
Trump said they are all going back.
Im sick of this curly haired manlet
>>55957614
Did you even read what the bill does? It doesn't impose background checks, it BARS ALL MIGRANTS AND REFUGEES from 30 nations with active jihadi movements, most notably Syria and Iraq.
>Sen. Rand Paul announced Monday that he was introducing legislation calling for an “immediate moratorium” on the United States issuing visas to refugees from about 30 countries with a “significant jihadist movement.”
>“My bill will also stop refugees as well as others from obtaining visas to immigrate, visit or to study in the U.S.,” Paul said on the conference call. The bill would be paid for by “a special tax on arms sales to the more than two dozen countries on the list,” the Kentucky senator added, though his campaign did not immediately release the list.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/rand-paul-visas-countries-jihadis-215940
Why do people on /pol/ always shoot their mouths off about shit they don't know even the basic facts about?
>>55957973
Either you're full of shit or he needs to fire whoever writes on his campaign site.
>>55923363
STAND WITH RAND
Oh boy oh boy
This is going to show EVERYONE'S true colors
>TFW TRUMP/RAND CONFIRMED
