Ask a professional Wikipedia editor anything.
whats the most common false claim that gets edited on wiki
>>55915024
Can you leave, please?
How much do you make?
>>55915024
Define professional.
Also, do you do it for free.
>>55915024
how many oranges can you eat before throwing up
>>55915024
How long have you been on foodstamps?
>>55915024
is cultural marxism even real?
>>55915024
Why is the gamergate article so full of hate and not neutral at all?
>>55915024
How objective do you consider wikipedia to be?
>>55915024
>professional Wikipedia editor
>>55915024
Do you have a girlfriend? Is it true wikipedia is run by Jews?
>>55915024
>"Professional" Wikipedia editor
>Janitorial "technician"
>Wendy's "chef"
Have you ever and will you recieve something for editing an article?
>>55915024
Do you feel in charge?
>>55915138
Religion
>>55915159
Why?
>>55915190
High end six figures
>>55915226
I make a six figure salary writing and editing Wikipedia articles for corporate clients.
>>55915250
I do not know. I've never tried to eat that many.
>>55915279
I am not, nor have I ever been, on food stamps.
>>55915312
Yes.
>>55915385
There are more liberal editors than their are conservative editors on Wikipedia.
>>55915450
Wikipedia is as objective as it's collective editorial base can be. Since most editors are liberal, there tends to be a liberal bias reflected on most political articles.
>>55915557
Yep.
>>55915627
I'm married.
>>55915782
That's funny. You probably won't life when you Goolge what I do for a living and discover that it actually is a a real thing.
are you a pedophile?
>>55915904
>he's an actual paid shill
>>55915024
Why is Æ so muck better than you?
>>55915024
What agenda do you push?
>>55915904
>High end six figures
So you may more than $500,000 a year, is this correct? Because that's at the "middle end" of 6 figures a year, so you make almost a million dollars a year if you're on the "high end".
>>55915024
6 GORRILLION
>>55915024
Why you work for the bad jews?
You're a jew slave, you know it?
take a fucking hike, you scum-sucking degenerate.
http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/wikipedi.html
Have you read this?
"It is an illusion that Wikipedians carry out "anonymous and collaborative editing": the very nature of Wikipedia encourages people to avoid collaboration and instead to leak ideological agendas into encyclopedia pages."
>>55915937
No.
>>55915990
lol, I guess if you want to put it that way, yes. I sell my advocacy.
>>55916008
Apples and Oranges. I am not a wiki.
>>55916059
What ever agenda I am paid to push, I push. I have very little scruples.
>>55916106
I made $846,716 dollars last year. I have an office, two partners and 7 employees. Our LLC made nearly two million last year.
>>55916245
I work for whoever is willing to pay me.
>>55916259
You seem upset.
>>55916380
I have. It's rubbish.
>>55916521
k
>>55916643
You ever had to fight a black person?
>>55916643
do you know Hitler was only trying to do the right thing?
>>55916643
>800k+
That's neato, senpai
>>55916643
>k
you're the one he's talking about, aren't you
>>55916643
>I made $846,716 dollars last year. I have an office, two partners and 7 employees. Our LLC made nearly two million last year.
So you're basically contracted out to do this work? Is Wikipedia your only client? How'd you get into this line of work?
>>55915024
What's your favorite dragon dildo?
>>55916643
How much would it cost for you to push the redpill agenda?
>>55915024
You know how much you've sensitized search inquires?
Soo much you can litteraly tell a wiki junkie froma mile away.
It's not a positive stigma.
Is what you do moral?
>>55916643
Do you sleep with hookers?
>>55916643
Is your mother a filthy whore?
>>55916643
how did you get into that line of work?
>>55916643
Why is this thread in /pol/ and not in /trash/?
>>55916643
Do you shitpost often?
>>55916643
Is your mother Strayan?
>>55915024
How can I become one?
Are there any repercussions for people who edit articles solely to push a narrative? The gamergate article is an utter joke and completely owned by far left identity politics progressives
>>55915024
Why was the article on Cultural Marxism removed and put as a conspiracy theory?
how is one qualified for such a job?
do you just know a shitload about everything? are you a human wikipedia? how do you find sources to site?
>>55916747
no.
>>55916833
The road to hell is paved with good intentions
>>55916905
We pay our employees about 73k. Most of our money comes from monitoring, for which we charge a monthly service fee.
>>55916913
no
>>55916973
We are. We have many fortune 500 hundred companies that pay us to monitor their Wikipedia pages. We maintain a vigil on their behalf to ensure their page is not defaced.
>>55917014
Could you be more specific?
>>55917028
I don't understand your question.
>>55917199
Morality is subjective
>>55917301
I've slept with a few, but that was well over 10 years ago.
>>55917360
Of course not. Why, is yours?
>>55917395
My father has many connections in New York. He helped me and my buddy start our company.
>>55917617
I never shitpost
>>55917713
no.
>>55917797
Edit articles. You have to know how that process works very well. Also, you'll need a degree.
>>55917860
There are. Editing articles has become a very political endeavor . There is a lot of money protecting that Gamergate article. We mainly focus on protecting corporate articles.
>>55917882
You know why.
>>55917910
Its a niche. Like most things, it's not what you know, it's who you know.
>>55916643
Do you have any idea why there often is an inmense variation in quality of articles by language? I mean, most articles in spanish are utter shit, half copy pastes and badly translated without sources compared to their english counterparts.
Surely there has to be someone willing and capable to fix this. Is it a 'do your own research' thing or something?
>>55918335
Ah ok I see, so you're more like a reputation management firm than a Wikipedia editor, one in the same in your case I suppose. Interesting.
>>55918335
Whose money is protecting the GG article?
>>55918335
>you know why
Fug
>>55918335
I'm serious about >>55916991.
>>55918335
How do you bill for that? Is it by hour? # of words? etc?
>>55918335
>there is a lot of money protecting the gamer gate article
Elaborate please
>>55918335
>There is a lot of money protecting that Gamergate article.
please ellaborate
>>55918335
>I never shitpost
This thread is a shitpost. It belongs in /trash/
>>55918665
I miss homosuck
>>55918335
I don't agree that morality is subjective but please answer me directly.
Is what you do moral?
>>55915904
>there are more liberal editors than their are conservative editors on Wikipedia
Is that really what it comes down to is volume? Do you think if some of these lazy-assed faggots went and registered, then put forth the effort, they could properly change the articles that reflect leftist fantasy into the truth?
>>55915024
why the fuck did they let a Marxist take down the "Cultural Marxism" page?
>>55918335
Do you like dry aged or wet aged?
>>55919050
>I don't agree that morality is subjective
Then you are a fucking retard
The Paris attack alone should show you that morality is subjective
>>55915024
can you help me get an entry job?
>>55915024
Cultural Marxism page. Why was it removed
>>55915024
How does an internet page spend 8 million dollars in one year?
>>55919137
>>55919428
Nice job at following the thread.
>>55918335
Do you have any tip for start up companies ?, for young entrepreneurs ?, thank you ...
>>55919258
Killing unarmed people execution style is moral?
>>55915904
>High end six figures
And i got a degree in math and make 300k in any job i want :')
>>55919978
According to Islamic extremists, yes it is if they are non-believers. Hell even the fact that people argue about abortion should show you how extremely subjective morality is. Are you fucking stupid
>>55919128
>Is that really what it comes down to is volume?
How do people not know this as common sense? Do people honestly think a non-bias policy is going to keep out the bias?
Not to mention that the libs knew to jump on this from the beginning and work the rules to their advantage.
A gamergate (/ˈɡæmərˌɡeJt/) is a mated worker ant that is able to reproduce sexually, i.e. lay fertilized eggs that will develop as females. Gamergates are restricted to taxa where the workers have a functional sperm reservoir ('spermatheca'). In various species, gamergates reproduce in addition to winged queens (usually upon the death of the original foundress), while in other species the queen caste has been completely replaced by gamergates. In gamergate species, all workers in a colony have similar reproductive potentials, but as a result of physical interactions, a dominance hierarchy is formed and only one or a few top-ranking workers can mate (usually with foreign males) and produce eggs. Subsequently however, aggression is no longer needed as gamergates secrete chemical signals that inform the other workers of their reproductive status in the colony.
Depending on species, there can be one gamergate per colony (monogyny) or several gamergates (polygyny). Most gamergate species have colonies with a few hundreds of workers or less.
>>55920162
But is the action ultimately moral? I agree that people interpret morality subjectively, but that does not mean that something becomes moral if you believe it is. This conversation is going to devolve into sources of morality and I'm going to bring up God and you, being a cold-hearted Nordic, are going to say there is no god, so I'm going to avoid that long protracted discussion that I frankly don't have time for.
Simply put: Morality is subjective insofar as humans interpret it subjectively, but morality is ultimately objective.
>>55915024
Nobody cares about you. Fuck off
>>55915024
/trash/
>>55920751
>how do people not know this
>muh common sense
From a board which moans constantly (and rightfully so) about how elites ignore the will of the majority. That's what I suspected was afoot at Wikipedia, actually.
>>55918335
Who has been your most unexpected corporate client?
Are you a kike?
>>55921249
I'm actually agreeing with you; and don't call you out, but mention 'people.'
>>55915024
Are you Jobrot?
>>55915024
As you previously mentioned
>Morality is subjective
Has there ever been a case where, according to your moral standards, you declined a "job" (pushing an agenda, lying on a page etc)? If so, what was the case (without any specifics or names of course)?
Why haven't you fixed the gamergate article yet?
Do you knowingly lie and spread dis-information because you're paid to do so?
>>55918335
Do you take care of Hitler's article?
Are there editors who are paid for denouncing people as conspiracy theorists on wikipedia?
>>55915024
How much would you be willing to charge to push the "The with Open Gates" agenda to the wikipedia?
Like write a favourable review of the video and post it as a viral video that has changed the course of "mainstream philosophy about immigration and world politics".
>>55922564
Fucking mobile phone.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/11/11/watch-anti-migrant-video-going-viral-across-europe/
This video.
>>55921968
If not do you know him by reputation of in person? Where can I find him as I want to kill him and everyone he has ever spoken to.
>>55918567
>>55918704
>>55918738
The Associated Press
>>55919050
Is the color orange a good color or a bad color?
>>55919128
If there were more conservative editors, the articles would reflect that conservative majority, yes. Liberal editors are very well aware of this.
>>55919137
>>55919428
This page? http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism
That page is very vulnerable. It is poorly written and it has absolutely no sources supporting it.
>>55919678
Don't follow the rich, follow the wealthy. Show me who you associate with and I'll tell you who you are.
>>55921480
I can't answer that without potentially revealing my identity. You'd be very surprised though.
>>55922046
No, never. We accept any client, for any job, as long as it's legal. We will not, however, intentionally falsify an article, not because doing so is immoral, but because doing so would compromise our ability to continue to edit articles.
>>55922158
No. We have never been asked to.
>>55922303
If it can be argued with sources that a particular person or group has a tendency to conflate evidence with conjecture, we would happily take on that job for a fee.
>>55922747
What is your favorite Wikipedia article? Just from a personal perspective.
>>55915024
[Citation needed]
Any insight on how the "sanction" system of wikipedia works? It seems to be completely whacky and arbitrary on who gets to decide what.
>>55915024
Thanks for this, quite interesting
>The more you know
One last question:
>University student
>Doing research about a specific corporate entity
>Use Wikipedia to get overview before digging deeper
Is it a bad idea generally to rely on Wikipedia as a source to get the gist about a specific topic or corporate entity?
>>55922747
>http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism
Are. You. Jobrot?
If not, what is a sandbox?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jobrot/sandbox
>>55922747
Have you ever had second thoughts?
Are there no limits as to what I can make you shill for on wikipedia?
>>55922747
>I can't answer that without potentially revealing my identity. You'd be very surprised though.
No specifics, then, but field of endeavor, perhaps.
>>55922747
In another vein, how many iterations of Q&A's are you prepared to go through until you substantiate your initial claim? Being that you're smart enough (as by your claim) to know that it would eventually be asked, you would naturally have prepared some form of proof that would not lead back to you personally.
>>55923178
That user is a victim of someone gaming the system
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Gaming_the_system
>>55922747
>The Associated Press
Elaborate, please.
>>55923612
Why is it allowed? One article he basically owns now is locked. How is such an article unlocked? If I was to provide a book basically disproving his base claim would it be enough?
>>55922747
When will Naruto fillers fucking end already? I'm fucking sick of this shit, 3 months without a proper episode!
>>55918567
>>55918704
>>55918738
>>55923889
Come one, guys, noodle it through. The central point of gamergate exposes that there is a collusive force manipulating content to serve a sociopolitical agenda, which makes the objectivity of the press itself as suspect.
The people of the Associated Press would circle the wagons even if they weren't personally involved to protect their industry's interests.
Gamergate threads never knew what it was up against.
Have you seen this painting of jimbo?
https://vimeo.com/68459552
>>55915024
Do you have custom software? What sort of reporting do you offer clients?
>>55915904
>Wikipedia is as objective as it's collective editorial base can be
Jewish Bolshevism involvement in the genocide of a hundred million white people was moved to conspiracy theory category. Fuck off.
>>55915024
Why are you such a liberal scumfuck?
>>55924369
anime is for plebs, read the manga, or is reading too hard for you, fuckface?
>>55922747
What's your typical day?
How much free time do you have during that day?
Do you only work for Wikipedia? If a jew gave you money to shill about his goldmine on 4chan, will you do it?
Why the fuck Wikipédia keep asking for "donations" every fucking year, what happened to their jewgold?
>>55924369
Watch better anime you faggot
Sorry to hijack thread OP. but....
>>55917882
>>55919428
>>55919137
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3eq0z2/hulk_hogan_and_our_twotier_future_on_freedom_of/cthnrta
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3f6fey/wikipedias_sjw_crowd_manages_to_delete_the/
+ Jobrot.
>>55925243
Ye I read it. And I don't even watch anime but I started this crap in high school and I wanna see it through.
>>55925389
Yeah I know it's shit. I watch it ironically.
>>55915024
>the fucking chief of a shill tribe
>>>55921480
>I can't answer that without potentially revealing my identity. You'd be very surprised though.
I wanna know
>>55915904
>is cultural marxism even real?
>Yes.
If cultural marxism is real why was the Wikipedia article about it removed and redirected to the conspiracy theory section of the Frankfurt School article?
>>55922747
Is the color orange an action one does to others?
Is what you do moral or immoral?
>>55927789
Given their answers to questions of immorality, I'm going to guess:
[_] Moral
[_] Immoral
[X] Amoral
I assume you live in Jew York, how do you maintain an unbiased opinion?
>>55915024
Do you enjoy reading the dank revisions that people make just to be shitters?
>>55921495
Are you a kike?
>>55915024
>professional
>Wikipedia editor
Choose 1 pls.
