Do you agree with this?
http://strawpoll.me/6020728
The Telegraph is a conservative paper and so the results are heavily biased towards what conservatives think. For example, all of their polls on whether or not we should leave the EU usually are 80%+ in favour of leaving - compared to all national polls indicating that those in favour is actually much closer to 45%.
But yes, I do agree.
>>55890030
Only 53% want all three not 83%
>>55890238
This, baka OP
>>55891796
>>55890238
Okay you're right, 53% wants all of them, 83% wants at least one of them.
>>55890030
No deport all Muslims option?
>>55891888
This is the only option.
>>55891888
That's impossible now, they're natural born citizens
It cannot be reversed
There are fucking teens across the street from me using their new shitty flat to smoke weed and bring friends over. They roam around in packs of 20 at night and have smashed my car wing mirror off, and damaged other local's cars.
When we ask the popo to get involved they refuse because they can't possibly find out who did it since they do this shit at like 3am.
Fuck yes I want more surveillance, the gov is free to install CCTV all over the outside of my fucking house. Cunts. Also bomb ISIS in to the Jurassic age. You know, when humans didn't exist. Fuck em.
>>55890030
I chose review asylum policy. Intelligence groups have already flagged most of the attackers but did nothing to stop them. Bombing their country only antagonizes and honestly those places don't matter to us, it's not like we're going in to occupy and change anything afterward. I think the most realistic option is to review who comes in and out of this country, start to limit and greatly reduce the amount of immigrants.
>>55892030
Buy your own camera or is that illegal?
>>55892115
He can but he's clearly a fucking idiot
>No "Bomb Isil in Syria and review asylum policy" option
I see through your biased poll, OP
People who want more surveillance, bombs and no refugees will be the first to hang on the Day of the Rope.
>>55892020
Why not? It's simple to deport people if you use monetary incentive for corrupt governments to take them. We could even use the military.
Don't be a beta male.
>>55892188
Have we really come to the point where stormfag shit isn't laughed at on /pol/ and /n/?
I'm never a fan of increased surveillance, but yes to the other 2.
>>55892030
When I visited London I saw on the TV they were chasing some dark skinned criminal and had his picture from the bus.
Our buses don't have cameras, and we only use very few cameras for traffic reasons in public places. Shops have them because they're private and live in the 21st century.
CCTV isn't that bad to be honest family, you truly feel a bit safer beneath the watchful eyes™
>surveillance
bad, do you really still believe that the state is your friend?
>bombing shitskins in the middle east
What does it do to thwart terror attacks in europe?
Nothing, they have all the manpower they need here already. This has been tried and it doesnt work.
They need to be purged in Europe to the extent that they go back to their home.
>reviev immigration policy
not review, end all immigration, end all gibs for immigrants, ramp up rethoric so they start to feel like shit might turn rough, encourage repatritation with gibs
>>55892030
Put booby traps and kill them
>>55892700
>>surveillance
>bad, do you really still believe that the state is your friend?
Meanwhile the UK has stopped 7 terror attacks this year alone, thanks to surveillance.
>>55892188
Why is wanting no refugees a punishable offense?
>>55892853
I honestly have a hard time believing that, atleast the americans make up this shit all the time. The main thing is though, that when things turn bad, remember you are on a watchlist.
>>55892399
Increasd surveilnce is our governments response to everything though, dosen't matter who wins the election.
>>55892853
And they also know who you are, where you live, what food you eat what porn you watch what is your political affiliation what posts you make what movies you like what news you read
>>55893038
And that is really fucking bad when the state goes in to a state of emergency and rule of law is thrown out the window
>>55890030
Typical overreaction following a tragedy.
Same shit happened in the U.S. post-9/11 and look what that got us.
>>55892983
My grandparents have a Russian-sounding name (they're from an island) and when they traveled to the US during the Cold War, they were stopped, their name flagged them.
They had a nice talk with some nice people and explained the situation and their pro-American views (they lived through WW2 followed by a civil war so they had every reason to support the US) and nothing ever happened to them, my grandma later visited the US multiple times with no problems.
Watchlists are just a meme, if you're not a bad guy you won't be affected.
>/pol/ now advocating bullshit anti freedom
thanks for ruining /pol/
>>55893135
Right? Feels like I'm taking crazy pills.
But hey I guess it's worth stopping a few terrorists, even if the abuse of power that comes with it will make all our lives notably worse.
>>55893135
>implying /news/ wasn't natsoc
newfag
>>55893096
Completely agreed
>>55893130
Thing is, in Sweden atleast, I could be thrown in prison for a lot of the things that I post here on /pol/. I don't know if i'm on a watchlist or not, I do know that the things I think and say make me an enemy of the state.
I like the poll forces you to vote for increased surveillance even if you'd just want to remove kebab
>>55893135
>natsoc
>anything but anti-freedom
newfag
>>55893377
checked
are you the same brit from the other thread with the dead muzzie kid OP?
>>55893392
I post quite a bit of anti-islam stuff on here
>mfw they're collecting all of my posts and building a case
>>55893399
I mean, you have hate speech laws, right?
It is after all the current year.
Jesus how much more surveillance can Britain fucking get?
Do they want anal implants with the robot from Jaba's palace, that little wall one that greets C3PO at the gate, to come out and say "Top of the morning to you citizen! "Remember no bombing people and don't read any books by George Orwell! Chip chip cherro!" As it abrasively slides back into everyone's anus taking a bit of skin and ass hair with it.
>>55893785
Meant for>>55893609
>>55893609
4chan is a mainstream site they don't scan people here, it wouldn't make sense.
Remember whenever some moron posts CP on 4chan, everyone who views the page has the image downloaded and saved by his computer automatically (temporary internet files etc). If 4chan was being monitored, virtually everyone on /v/, /b/ and many other boards would go to jail for downloading and possessing CP.
>>55893463
No, just a foreign student that believes that trading in your liberty for security isn't the way to go.
Although i am also against Islam, but i believe the danger for Europe is not the sporadic terrorist attacks but rather the overtaking of Europe politically, culturally and genetically
>>55890030
Less surveilance, but no immigration. The need for it would be gone.
Special killer-teams of higly trained soldiers sneaking up on and killing every single person on this planet who supports Sharia-law.
Bombs destroy too much of the infrastructure, we need that for the decent people who are left.
>>55893956
Ofcourse, the muslims are not what is killing us.
They are merely a symptom of a dying civilisation.
>>55894012
Agree with every single thing, stay based bro
>>55894012
>Special killer-teams of highly trained soldiers sneaking up on and killing every single person on this planet who supports Sharia-law.
That's gonna require and army bud.
I recommend we give Serbia a ring.
>>55893281
it wasn't
>>55894202
Both Sweden and Norway have highly regarded commandos, they are just fighting at the wrong place.
>>55894044
i wouldn't say a symptom, rather a condition that our weakened immune system cannot fight. The AIDS that is killing our immune system is in fact the toxic leftist policies, propaganda and total media control that are distancing us from morality, values and tradition.
And in the fact that our current state is closer to a "left fascism" than the masses would ever dream about. you know, with all the banned speach, state control and foreign affairs meddling by the leadership of the Delian League, *ahem* European Union
>>55894390
You are more eloquent than me and very sound opinions. Have a funny video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rg8innCuN4
>>55894202
Fixing my typing error of the word highly was very nice of you. Thanks!
Telegraph commenters are everything that /pol/ aspires to be. Redpilled as fuck while actually being informed. The paper itself is fairly bad, but the commenters take no shit and see right true whatever bullshit the media is spouting today.
>>55894012
Get over here and take my vote, goddammit!
>>55893392
You are on a watchlist Sven, as am I, don't kid yourself into thinking you aren't.
>>55895636
I was just trying to concede a point to the greek, yes i probably am
The thing about surveillance is that at some point it removes the peoples chance of dethroning rulers who SHOULD be dethroned. And the fact is that those who absolutely should not be in power are the best at getting to power. Because they do not care who they hurt to get there.
>>55890030
Link to that survey please. Can't seem to find it. Much appreciated!
>>55896151
I found the image on Twitter I don't have it either sorry
>more surveillance
are the cameras going to hop down from the wall and jump into the face of a suicidebomber, or what?
morons.
is this picture accurate?
answer to deal with this problem is very simple - cut off benefits
>>55892020
>the cancer has spread throuout my entire left testicle.
>i cannot possibly get rid of it at this point
pay denbts my friend and maybe we will teach you medicine
>>55896360
The idea that France supporting the Kurds against ISIS is somehow making ISIS stronger is completely retarded.
The ones supporting ISIS are Turkey, who buys oil from them, and they are the other enemies of the Kurds, and Saudi Arabia/Qatar, who fund them as puppets against Syria and Iran.
>>55890030
Hello police state.
Thanks USA!
>>55896384
Cutting off benefits would only work if Muslims were otherwise unemployable.
That's not the case anymore. It has become accepted to even have Muslims work in super markets and refuse to handle pork and alcohol, let alone the ones employed by Muslim businesses themselves.
Same amount of surveillance
Bomb ISIS to dust, work with Assad to retake ISIS positions
Review asylum policy
Review migration policy
Send the Jungle dwellers home
Close borders entirely for a while
Secure the fucking borders
>>55890030
I'd encourage more surveillance if the government did their job right and only applied it to those on watch lists and didn't collect everyone else's data for a year. But they'll do the latter because power corrupts and they'd love to become the thought police
>>55897092
I honestly do not think they can collect more than they already do. I think that is one of the reasons they DON'T catch all terrorists, however, the moment an attack is going off they know what homes to raid. They check everything they have stored on the person who did the attack and suddenly they know everyone that person has been in contact with.
The fact that they have ALL this information stored about every single one of us, and not only those who might be a terrorist is making it hard to find terrorists BEFORE they have started their attack. It's kind of a needle-in-the-haystack kind of situation when they have total surveillance on all of us.
It would be pretty effective at stopping any attempt at removing the corrupt from power though. The moment the first wave of attacks are happening the rest would be jailed.
It's really more of a treat to our freedom than any terrorist ever will be.
>>55897092
>I'd encourage more surveillance if the government did their job right and only applied it to those on watch lists
As far as I know, they already do this.
Obviously the desire is to ram through Theresa's blanket web surveillance bill. Can't wait for her household's browsing history to go public in the next ISP hack.
>>55897942
I think this surveillance is already in place. They just don't have the "ok go" signal for it, so it's secret.
>>55890030
Your graph-reading skills appear to be weak.
53% want all of that.
>Isil in Syria
retards
>Increase Surveillance
Jesus christ fuck these idiots
>>55892399
Yeah, no option to deport the scum and bomb the shit out of them without their 1984 shit, wtf.
>>55890030
>more surveillance
it's like people just want to get fucked by big brother at this point.
>>55898671
get fucked by david cameron knowing your porn doens't involve fucking pigs, or get fucked by a jihadi swinging at your neck because surveillance that could be done right wasn't there to stop an attack.
You know which one people will choose.
>>55892020
If you have the political will to do something, then it becomes retroactively legal. You think the french revolution was legal at the time?
For all the pretenses of insulated and naive metropolitans, might still makes right, always was that way and always will be.
>>55898840
>being so british you cannot think of another solution than more surveillance or none.
>>55898983
I'm afraid that's the way it goes cabroni. IN this kind of thing the sheeple become a herd.
>>55890030
Doesn't surprise me at all. Talk to any brit above the age of 25 without a twitter account and they'll be against immigration and against refugees. It's these kek faggot 16 year olds on social media crying about muh tolerance that speak the loudest though.
>>55899385
I told you all my little pony would be our undoing. Less people would be about love and tolerance if it wasn't for those sleeper agent bronies
>>55890030
PURGE ALL MUSLIMS 99%
obviously 53% want to do it and 47% are muslims or women who are sympathizers to muslims
>>55899385
no its the 45-60 year olds. they are the most annoying liberals. 16 year olds are to busy playing cawuhdewty to give a shit about anything
>>55896428
>and maybe we will teach you medicine
Yeah, because the last time you tried that it worked out so well.
>>55892700
>deport people with 50% or less european blood as a EU wide policy
>>55890030
Bongs....
>>55896384
This.
If we stop giving them welfare, the vast majority of immigrants will go elsewhere, the few still coming will be looking for work and actually contributing to our society.
